Sarkka

Sarkka — CS2 Stats

FI76561197976511153[U:1:16245425]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

665Tracked matches30%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#60790 of 251512 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,516 +2,262 13 Aug – 30 Sept · 5 days played
19,25421,562peak 21,56213 Aug30 Sept
21,562Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2024-05-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSarkkaFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning59
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–46–4Last 10050%Win rateWWWWLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +4.2pp headshot accuracy · −52ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 666ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 653ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 679ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility6.4
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch2.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 659ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning5.9
Utility6.4
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time665ms+24ms
first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 665ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 8 Jun →
63%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · anubis, 13 Aug →
445msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · anubis, 2 May →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 13 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W4Current streak
2–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2210–1245%-0.00
dust2B1910–953%0.03
anubisC177–1041%-0.02
mirageC167–944%-0.03
ancientA116–555%-0.00
overpassS86–275%0.01
inferno—30–30%-0.04
vertigo—33–0100%0.06
office—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

281Matches
49%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
67.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis2348%0.8111.6
Mirage2055%0.8413.5
Nuke2060%1.0412.5
Ancient1932%0.7413.5
Overpass1567%1.0613.3
Dust2933%0.9616.0
Inferno333%0.8413.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
28.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.7%Spray accuracy
84.7%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
659msReaction time
25.6%T opening success
48.2%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
9.17HE damage / grenade
9.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.5871% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–70.0823%23 Nov →
office13–50.0716%23 Nov →
nuke13–70.0024%30 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0226%30 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0210%29 Oct →
dust210–130.0126%29 Oct →
nuke7–130.0820%29 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0424%28 Oct →
dust213–60.1022%28 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0111%28 Oct →
dust213–10.1429%28 Oct →
mirage10–12-0.045%28 Oct →
dust220–220.0126%24 Oct →
anubis1–4-0.019%24 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.098%24 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.016%24 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0514%23 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0214%21 Oct →
dust20–3-0.0725%21 Oct →
anubis13–2-0.0024%21 Oct →
mirage9–130.0027%21 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0622%20 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0319%20 Oct →
dust210–130.0522%19 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0022%19 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.1016%13 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0517%13 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0620%2 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.1610%2 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0420%2 Oct →
nuke13–70.0421%1 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0628%1 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0111%30 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0017%30 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0116%30 Sept →
anubis10–130.0219%29 Sept →
dust213–70.0019%29 Sept →
nuke13–50.0111%22 Sept →
dust29–130.0623%22 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0714%22 Sept →
nuke12–120.0129%22 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.0412%22 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0216%22 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.1125%22 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0340%21 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0511%21 Sept →
ancient13–80.0127%21 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0212%21 Sept →
vertigo13–5-0.0219%21 Sept →
nuke13–60.059%21 Sept →
mirage16–130.0119%20 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0222%20 Sept →
mirage13–40.0223%20 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0411%15 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.1018%15 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0513%10 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0718%10 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0222%10 Sept →
dust210–130.0219%2 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0013%2 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0222%1 Sept →
nuke13–100.0114%1 Sept →
mirage13–40.0430%1 Sept →
ancient15–150.0415%29 Aug →
dust213–70.0523%29 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0763%13 Aug →
nuke13–80.0619%13 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.1010%13 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0211%13 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0215%13 Aug →
vertigo13–60.1211%17 Jun →
nuke13–60.0620%17 Jun →
anubis13–20.0721%17 Jun →
overpass13–100.1219%9 Jun →
ancient13–8-0.0329%9 Jun →
nuke1–11-0.0841%9 Jun →
nuke9–10.1811%8 Jun →
overpass13–3-0.0525%8 Jun →
anubis13–30.0927%8 Jun →
dust213–10.0913%8 Jun →
vertigo13–10.0920%8 Jun →
overpass13–50.0524%7 Jun →
mirage13–60.0415%7 Jun →
overpass22–18-0.0118%26 May →
anubis9–13-0.0010%26 May →
nuke17–19-0.0316%26 May →
nuke13–9-0.0431%19 May →
ancient8–13-0.0211%19 May →
overpass13–90.0222%19 May →
ancient16–130.0019%14 May →
overpass4–13-0.0417%13 May →
ancient13–00.1015%13 May →
anubis12–120.0518%9 May →
overpass12–12-0.0210%9 May →
mirage9–13-0.0511%7 May →
dust212–60.1015%4 May →
nuke2–11-0.0622%3 May →
dust28–130.0228%3 May →
anubis13–40.0216%2 May →
overpass13–40.0329%2 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.