[R]eginho "OneLife"

[R]eginho "OneLife" — CS2 Stats

FR76561197975703756[U:1:15438028]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

544Tracked matches55%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating15,910Purple band · top ~24.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 18 days played since 3 Sep 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,910 +1,704 3 Sept22 Sept · 18 days played
11,70817,994peak 17,9943 Sept22 Sept
18,356Peak Premier in tracked matches
18Days played since 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,084 below peak (17,994)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,090 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-21
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG[R]eginho "OneLife"FACEITLevel 1STANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedPREMIER15,910 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning39
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50482Last 10050%Win rateLWLWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.0pp headshot accuracy · +41ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 466ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 445ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility4.8
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch2.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 45 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 54% on T to 30% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning3.9
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time447ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 452ms → last ⅓ avg 447ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–8 · inferno, 9 Sept
75%Best headshot accuracy · 5–1 · dust2, 6 Sept
203msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · nuke, 19 Sept
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 22 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 15anubisWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2112957%-0.00
mirageB1991047%0.01
dust2B1991047%-0.01
infernoA159660%0.00
anubisC125742%0.01
ancientC94544%-0.01
cache42250%0.03
vertigo1010%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

85Matches
47%Win rate
0.71Avg K/D
59.9ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2138%0.7610.5
Dust21828%0.549.8
Nuke1258%0.8913.8
Ancient1136%0.478.1
Anubis1070%0.9311.9
Inferno978%0.8111.6
Overpass250%0.6210.0
Cache250%0.364.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
24.2%Spray accuracy
79.7%Counter-strafing
4.7°Preaim
434msReaction time
53.6%T opening success
29.8%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
11.50HE damage / grenade
3.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.4639 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 29.8165% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–130.0025%22 Sept
inferno13–4-0.0320%22 Sept
mirage6–130.0513%22 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0310%22 Sept
mirage13–0-0.0122%22 Sept
anubis13–16-0.0520%22 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0414%21 Sept
inferno14–160.0119%21 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0032%20 Sept
dust28–13-0.0430%20 Sept
anubis7–130.0613%20 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0622%20 Sept
nuke13–11-0.059%19 Sept
anubis13–90.0411%19 Sept
nuke1–13-0.1020%19 Sept
nuke15–15-0.0213%19 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0220%18 Sept
ancient13–90.0017%18 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0023%18 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0318%18 Sept
inferno13–100.0255%18 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0521%18 Sept
anubis8–130.0518%17 Sept
dust211–130.0018%17 Sept
ancient13–3-0.0431%16 Sept
nuke3–130.0524%16 Sept
anubis13–80.0515%14 Sept
dust213–80.0125%14 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0227%14 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0316%14 Sept
inferno5–00.050%14 Sept
dust28–130.0214%14 Sept
nuke0–10-0.0933%14 Sept
mirage7–130.0816%14 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0433%14 Sept
inferno13–80.029%13 Sept
cache11–130.0542%13 Sept
cache13–80.0318%13 Sept
dust213–100.0315%13 Sept
dust213–70.0633%13 Sept
mirage7–130.0221%12 Sept
nuke13–70.0926%12 Sept
anubis4–130.0114%12 Sept
cache16–120.0320%12 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0415%12 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0128%12 Sept
dust213–10-0.0213%12 Sept
mirage14–160.0630%12 Sept
anubis16–13-0.0321%12 Sept
nuke13–70.0614%12 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0022%12 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0513%12 Sept
ancient10–130.0830%12 Sept
dust215–15-0.0310%11 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0115%11 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0429%11 Sept
nuke14–160.0427%11 Sept
anubis13–80.0221%11 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0116%11 Sept
dust213–7-0.0823%11 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0130%11 Sept
mirage13–100.0213%9 Sept
mirage8–130.0212%9 Sept
inferno13–80.1418%9 Sept
nuke13–110.1015%9 Sept
dust213–80.0210%9 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0332%8 Sept
nuke16–130.0618%8 Sept
mirage11–130.0420%8 Sept
inferno6–130.0117%8 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0521%7 Sept
dust27–13-0.0130%7 Sept
dust25–13-0.0533%7 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0430%7 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0133%7 Sept
dust25–1-0.0175%6 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0126%6 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0319%5 Sept
mirage13–50.0426%5 Sept
dust28–13-0.0328%5 Sept
mirage13–70.0532%5 Sept
dust212–160.0418%5 Sept
dust210–130.0214%4 Sept
cache10–130.0222%4 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0014%4 Sept
dust210–13-0.0122%4 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0219%4 Sept
anubis6–130.0112%4 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0020%4 Sept
dust213–10-0.0511%4 Sept
dust213–110.059%4 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0123%4 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0313%4 Sept
ancient11–130.0119%4 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0118%3 Sept
nuke7–130.0122%3 Sept
nuke13–9-0.068%3 Sept
nuke13–110.0214%3 Sept
vertigo6–13-0.098%3 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0123%3 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →