T E X R E X

T E X R E X — CS2 Stats

NO76561197974267446[U:1:14001718]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,357Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,156Top 10% of 197,133 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18354 of 244977 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,314 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 25,156 → 25,156
0Faceit ELO · 2,314 → 2,314
+6Tracked matches · now 4,357
0.0ppWin rate · 53.3% → 53.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 24 days played since 18 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,156 +1,155 21 Aug – 24 Sept · 10 days played
23,84126,164peak 26,16421 Aug24 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,314 +0 3 Sept – 24 Sept · 2 observations
2,3142,314peak 2,3143 Sept24 Sept
26,284Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,314Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-08-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,314
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 186 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,008 below peak (26,164)
  • +156 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,844 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGT E X R E XFACEITLevel 10 · 2,314 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,156 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,314csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim47
Positioning63
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–52Last 10048%Win rateWLWLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.0pp headshot accuracy · −51ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 428ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim4.7
Utility7.1
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 60% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7
Positioning6.3
Utility7.1
Mechanics3.0
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time532ms+35ms
first ⅓ avg 497ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 30 Aug →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · dust2, 30 Aug →
328msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · dust2, 28 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 30 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 24mirageWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2811–1739%0.02
infernoS2416–867%0.03
ancientA2113–862%0.00
anubisD113–827%0.00
cacheC83–538%0.01
mirageD51–420%-0.02
nuke—31–233%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6,679Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
75.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust249347%1.0214.7
Inferno42959%1.1215.6
Ancient28546%0.9814.6
Mirage28148%1.0113.8
Nuke16548%0.9813.9
Anubis11240%0.9515.0
Overpass7261%0.9514.3
Cache2241%0.8614.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
27.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.3%Spray accuracy
63.6%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
524msReaction time
52.3%T opening success
45.2%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
11.35HE damage / grenade
16.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–90.0418%25 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0115%24 Sept →
cache16–140.0312%20 Sept →
dust28–130.0819%20 Sept →
inferno6–130.0220%20 Sept →
dust29–130.0924%20 Sept →
inferno13–50.0224%19 Sept →
dust27–130.0420%17 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0215%15 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0519%15 Sept →
inferno16–140.0219%14 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0121%14 Sept →
ancient13–80.0115%14 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0521%13 Sept →
dust213–100.0317%13 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0414%12 Sept →
dust213–100.0624%12 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.077%12 Sept →
cache25–220.0525%12 Sept →
inferno7–130.0121%12 Sept →
inferno13–50.1028%12 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0036%12 Sept →
inferno16–120.0217%12 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0721%12 Sept →
ancient13–60.0211%12 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0023%12 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0910%12 Sept →
inferno16–130.0229%12 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0312%12 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0421%10 Sept →
dust28–130.0430%10 Sept →
ancient13–90.0321%10 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0125%6 Sept →
inferno13–90.0419%6 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0514%5 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0111%5 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0429%5 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0418%4 Sept →
ancient13–20.1314%4 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0512%4 Sept →
inferno13–90.1035%4 Sept →
anubis13–100.0315%4 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.1027%4 Sept →
inferno8–130.0120%4 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0219%3 Sept →
dust211–130.0434%1 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0022%1 Sept →
ancient13–50.0122%30 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0333%30 Aug →
dust213–00.1247%30 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0212%30 Aug →
inferno13–30.1628%30 Aug →
inferno13–160.0820%30 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0415%30 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0527%30 Aug →
dust213–100.0110%30 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0139%30 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0111%30 Aug →
inferno13–40.0419%30 Aug →
ancient7–130.0012%30 Aug →
dust213–50.0232%30 Aug →
cache5–130.0614%29 Aug →
anubis9–130.0420%29 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0126%29 Aug →
nuke13–60.1029%29 Aug →
anubis8–00.0614%29 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0130%28 Aug →
inferno16–14-0.0223%28 Aug →
dust26–130.0226%28 Aug →
dust213–80.0521%28 Aug →
anubis8–130.0112%28 Aug →
dust213–100.0515%28 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0114%28 Aug →
ancient13–80.0213%28 Aug →
inferno9–130.0615%28 Aug →
dust27–130.018%23 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.009%23 Aug →
mirage13–100.0532%23 Aug →
dust213–50.1524%23 Aug →
ancient13–100.0425%23 Aug →
anubis10–130.0122%23 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0319%23 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0030%23 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0417%23 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0119%23 Aug →
nuke7–130.0119%23 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0421%22 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0017%22 Aug →
dust213–160.0315%22 Aug →
cache13–70.0521%22 Aug →
anubis11–130.0021%22 Aug →
ancient13–100.0117%22 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0133%22 Aug →
inferno6–130.1020%21 Aug →
cache7–130.0110%21 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0032%21 Aug →
inferno13–90.0618%20 Aug →
dust210–130.0926%19 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0011%18 Aug →
inferno13–90.0013%18 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →