timmmmsssu — CS2 Stats

SE76561197973386801[U:1:13121073]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,227Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,000Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#1340 of 7975 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,461 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82

Positioning52

Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–52Last 10048%Win rateLWWWLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.2

Aggression8.1

Utility6.9

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels4.0

Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2

Positioning5.2

Utility6.9

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels4.1

Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time563ms−38ms

first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms

Headshot accuracy21.2%−0.5%

first ⅓ avg 21.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — cache 13–7

12–0Biggest win — ancient

7Longest win streak

9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 64% over 14dust2Weakest map · 17% over 18

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	A	26	15–11	58%	0.01
anubis	B	21	11–10	52%	0.02
dust2	D	18	3–15	17%	-0.01
cache	A	14	9–5	64%	0.01
nuke	A	12	7–5	58%	-0.00
mirage	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.04
inferno	—	4	2–2	50%	0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,147Matches

51%Win rate

1.16Avg K/D

89.8ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	610	56%	1.21	18.9
Anubis	482	56%	1.16	18.6
Nuke	364	49%	1.16	18.6
Dust2	277	44%	1.06	17.8
Inferno	165	46%	1.12	17.7
Mirage	89	43%	1.03	16.0
Cache	70	51%	1.10	16.7
Overpass	37	32%	1.16	18.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy

39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.0%Spray accuracy

81.6%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

568msReaction time

29.2%T opening success

63.1%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

13.2%Flash assists

9.53HE damage / grenade

13.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.1842% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	5–13	-0.05	30%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.01	17%	27 Aug →
cache	16–14	-0.01	11%	27 Aug →
ancient	16–13	-0.06	20%	27 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	36%	26 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	26%	26 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	21%	24 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	24%	23 Aug →
anubis	16–14	0.04	18%	23 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	16%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.07	22%	22 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.13	30%	22 Aug →
inferno	16–14	0.09	23%	22 Aug →
anubis	19–15	0.08	23%	20 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.10	7%	20 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.02	23%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	19%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.02	12%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.01	26%	19 Aug →
anubis	24–28	-0.02	16%	18 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.01	15%	18 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	14%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.13	36%	17 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.08	24%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.04	13%	16 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	39%	16 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	14%	15 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.00	17%	15 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	27%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.02	24%	15 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.06	16%	13 Aug →
nuke	16–13	0.01	21%	13 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.06	19%	13 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	27%	10 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.01	42%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.03	17%	10 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.06	22%	9 Aug →
nuke	20–22	0.02	16%	9 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.01	24%	9 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.05	16%	9 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.01	24%	8 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.00	20%	8 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.03	40%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.08	16%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.02	31%	8 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.03	33%	8 Aug →
anubis	1–13	-0.07	15%	8 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.14	20%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.04	30%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.12	14%	7 Aug →
ancient	16–12	-0.02	15%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.04	18%	6 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	9%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.08	16%	6 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.01	30%	6 Aug →
nuke	16–12	-0.01	9%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.03	19%	5 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.01	31%	5 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	21%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.03	20%	4 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.01	24%	3 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.03	31%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.00	23%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	21%	3 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	27%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.05	33%	3 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.01	15%	1 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.01	24%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.05	20%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.10	11%	1 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.09	25%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.01	19%	29 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	28%	29 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.11	7%	29 Jul →
anubis	3–13	0.06	26%	29 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.07	25%	29 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.04	46%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.04	19%	28 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.03	22%	28 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	10%	28 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.08	19%	28 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.06	19%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	17%	27 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.00	20%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.07	22%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.02	24%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.06	21%	26 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.03	21%	26 Jul →
ancient	12–0	0.10	26%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.01	26%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	25%	25 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	30%	25 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.02	2%	25 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	20%	25 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.01	13%	25 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.05	34%	25 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	21%	24 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.04	26%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	19%	23 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.02	27%	23 Jul →