lucy — CS2 Stats

76561197973269826[U:1:13004098]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,592Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.0 Solid

Premier CS Rating23,738Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#5903 of 29844 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,053 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57

Positioning56

Utility82

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61–37–2Last 10061%Win rateWWLLWLTWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.7

Aggression7.8

Utility8.2

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels3.1

Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 82 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7

Positioning5.6

Utility8.2

Mechanics5.3

Opening Duels3.2

Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time604ms+37ms

first ⅓ avg 567ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms

Headshot accuracy19.9%+0.8%

first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — nuke 13–7

13–2Biggest win — cache

8Longest win streak

W2Current streak

10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 77% over 13vertigoWeakest map · 14% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	A	21	13–8	62%	0.02
anubis	A	17	10–7	59%	-0.00
cache	A	15	9–6	60%	0.01
ancient	S	13	10–3	77%	0.01
inferno	S	11	8–3	73%	0.02
vertigo	D	7	1–6	14%	0.00
mirage	S	7	5–2	71%	-0.01
debris	—	3	2–1	67%	0.04
eldorado	—	2	1–1	50%	0.02
poseidon	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
dust2	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,220Matches

52%Win rate

1.00Avg K/D

73.3ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	173	57%	1.00	14.1
Anubis	158	51%	0.94	14.3
Vertigo	95	54%	1.02	14.6
Nuke	77	44%	0.97	14.4
Inferno	62	55%	1.00	14.4
Dust2	47	47%	0.95	14.3
Overpass	38	55%	0.93	14.0
Mirage	12	58%	0.84	13.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy

35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.7%Spray accuracy

74.0%Counter-strafing

12.6°Preaim

588msReaction time

29.5%T opening success

55.2%CT opening success

0.73Enemies flashed / flash

10.8%Flash assists

12.15HE damage / grenade

14.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.
Preaim 12.6019° — above the 12° mark we flag
Aim Training →

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
vertigo	9–4	0.13	28%	24 Aug →
eldorado	9–6	-0.05	9%	24 Aug →
poseidon	7–9	-0.01	27%	24 Aug →
debris	7–9	-0.01	26%	24 Aug →
cache	19–17	0.03	13%	14 Aug →
vertigo	0–9	-0.08	18%	13 Aug →
eldorado	8–8	0.09	25%	13 Aug →
debris	9–3	0.13	40%	13 Aug →
poseidon	9–3	0.07	25%	13 Aug →
vertigo	8–13	0.00	25%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.06	27%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.03	25%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.04	15%	11 Aug →
cache	13–2	-0.02	23%	10 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	7%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.03	25%	10 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.00	17%	10 Aug →
vertigo	6–7	0.01	33%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.17	20%	9 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	13%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.10	20%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–3	-0.01	10%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.01	7%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.09	25%	7 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.05	19%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.01	17%	6 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	33%	6 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.03	19%	6 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	-0.01	13%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.03	10%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–2	-0.00	11%	5 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	-0.03	16%	5 Aug →
anubis	17–19	-0.03	17%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.04	29%	2 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	19%	31 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	24%	31 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.00	17%	31 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.03	16%	30 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.03	16%	30 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.02	10%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.02	24%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.04	18%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	10%	26 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.04	14%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.02	33%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	19%	25 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.04	31%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	17%	24 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.05	21%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.01	21%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.07	16%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.06	18%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.00	13%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	11%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.00	18%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	19%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.07	19%	19 Jul →
nuke	17–19	-0.02	19%	19 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	14%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.03	22%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.05	24%	18 Jul →
nuke	16–12	0.05	27%	17 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.00	19%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	11%	17 Jul →
anubis	5–13	0.02	22%	17 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.00	20%	17 Jul →
anubis	15–15	-0.01	16%	14 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	20%	14 Jul →
nuke	14–16	-0.00	20%	14 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.04	23%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	21%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.05	21%	13 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.02	15%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.07	24%	13 Jul →
ancient	16–12	0.03	9%	13 Jul →
debris	9–7	-0.00	16%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.02	35%	12 Jul →
inferno	7–0	-0.05	0%	12 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.00	12%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.09	10%	12 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	35%	10 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.05	19%	10 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.03	26%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.02	20%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.04	25%	9 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	16%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.00	13%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.03	25%	8 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	17%	8 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.06	14%	8 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.07	22%	8 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.03	15%	7 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.01	18%	7 Jul →
vertigo	10–13	0.01	20%	6 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.01	24%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	25%	6 Jul →
overpass	13–10	0.01	16%	5 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.06	28%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.09	14%	5 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.06	13%	4 Jul →