waterfaLLZ

waterfaLLZ — CS2 Stats

PROwaterfaLLZTWRetiredRussiaCoachSettings & gear profile →

76561197972985852[U:1:12720124]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

945Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,335 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 945 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 1 Aug 2023. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,335 +0 29 Aug17 Sept · 5 observations
3,3353,335peak 3,33529 Aug17 Sept
3,335Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2023-08-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,335
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 165 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29

CSDB’s own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGwaterfaLLZFACEITLevel 10 · 3,335 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,335csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning51
Utility16

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY6535Last 10065%Win rateLLLWWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −11.1pp headshot accuracy · −70ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 462ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility1.6
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.1
Utility1.6
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time509ms−97ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 509ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–11 · ancient, 19 Nov
56%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · mirage, 2 Mar
352msFastest reaction time · 8–12 · mirage, 5 Mar
16–2Biggest win · mirage, 3 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L3Current streak
105In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
22Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 83% over 6ancientWeakest map · 50% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS4032880%0.02
anubisA23131057%-0.00
ancientB20101050%-0.00
nukeS64267%0.01
overpassS65183%0.03
inferno3030%0.00
dust21010%-0.03
vertigo110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,040Matches
57%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
78.8ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient12157%1.0814.9
Dust29450%1.1016.8
Mirage8662%1.1415.2
Anubis8355%1.0513.9
Nuke4951%1.1318.0
Overpass1788%1.2417.2
Inferno1457%1.0917.3
Train1471%1.7816.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$563Inventory value21ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
Souvenir MP9 | Hot Rod (Factory New)$290★ Flip Knife | Urban Masked (Field-Tested)$183StatTrak™ P250 | Cartel (Field-Tested)$23StatTrak™ Glock-18 | Blue Fissure (Minimal Wear)$15StatTrak™ MAC-10 | Heat (Field-Tested)$8Souvenir P250 | Contamination (Minimal Wear)$7

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
48.9%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
500msReaction time
16.0%T opening success
44.3%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
10.96HE damage / grenade
14.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4723 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 15.979% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient11–130.000%10 Jun
dust28–13-0.0311%28 Dec
ancient2–13-0.0619%24 Jul
anubis13–40.0721%1 May
mirage13–40.1033%1 May
anubis13–100.0315%7 Dec
nuke10–13-0.0621%23 Apr
anubis1–13-0.0617%23 Apr
overpass13–50.000%17 Apr
anubis13–16-0.085%8 Apr
mirage13–20.0515%8 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0213%5 Apr
mirage13–70.1033%5 Apr
mirage9–130.0347%3 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0048%3 Apr
anubis13–110.0426%1 Apr
mirage13–110.0526%7 Mar
ancient9–13-0.109%6 Mar
mirage13–90.0311%6 Mar
mirage13–40.0126%6 Mar
anubis13–6-0.0013%6 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0119%5 Mar
mirage13–30.1115%5 Mar
ancient10–12-0.0215%5 Mar
anubis13–10-0.0423%5 Mar
mirage8–12-0.1025%5 Mar
anubis10–13-0.025%4 Mar
anubis16–140.007%4 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0115%4 Mar
anubis13–70.0222%4 Mar
nuke13–40.0119%4 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0414%4 Mar
mirage13–9-0.048%3 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0027%3 Mar
anubis7–130.0514%2 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0118%2 Mar
anubis5–130.0317%2 Mar
overpass13–20.0332%2 Mar
mirage13–60.0656%2 Mar
mirage13–10.0618%2 Mar
mirage13–80.0926%1 Mar
anubis8–130.0212%1 Mar
nuke16–130.0418%28 Feb
ancient13–110.0222%28 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0323%26 Feb
nuke13–9-0.036%26 Feb
overpass13–30.0016%26 Feb
overpass13–30.0432%26 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0411%23 Feb
mirage13–30.0218%23 Feb
mirage13–30.0735%23 Feb
ancient16–14-0.039%15 Feb
mirage16–14-0.037%6 Feb
mirage13–160.0519%5 Feb
ancient4–13-0.0236%1 Feb
mirage13–110.0228%1 Feb
overpass13–100.0832%28 Jan
ancient13–160.0125%26 Jan
nuke13–90.0936%26 Jan
ancient13–6-0.0116%26 Jan
mirage13–50.0727%25 Dec
ancient13–9-0.0031%9 Dec
ancient13–110.1532%19 Nov
anubis13–6-0.0327%30 Oct
mirage13–16-0.0226%29 Oct
mirage13–8-0.0514%29 Oct
ancient13–16-0.0128%28 Oct
mirage13–16-0.0326%28 Oct
mirage13–50.0121%28 Oct
mirage13–11-0.0529%20 Oct
mirage19–15-0.0131%20 Oct
vertigo13–60.0526%20 Oct
ancient10–13-0.0323%20 Oct
anubis13–90.0623%14 Oct
anubis11–13-0.079%10 Oct
mirage13–3-0.090%10 Oct
mirage13–80.0218%10 Oct
mirage13–8-0.0520%10 Oct
ancient13–6-0.0220%10 Oct
mirage13–80.0114%10 Oct
mirage13–60.0430%10 Oct
mirage13–9-0.0423%4 Oct
mirage11–1-0.0424%4 Oct
inferno8–13-0.0112%3 Oct
ancient13–10-0.0315%3 Oct
overpass9–13-0.0118%3 Oct
ancient13–50.0321%10 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0124%7 Sept
mirage13–80.1031%6 Sept
mirage14–160.0635%26 Aug
mirage16–100.0824%17 Aug
ancient16–140.0925%17 Aug
inferno12–160.0423%15 Aug
ancient12–160.0517%15 Aug
anubis19–150.0231%4 Aug
mirage8–16-0.0116%4 Aug
mirage16–20.0122%3 Aug
mirage16–20.0911%3 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0522%1 Aug
inferno10–16-0.0219%1 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →