J0hnny

J0hnny — CS2 Stats

76561197972055442[U:1:11789714]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,906Tracked matches86%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,034 → 3,034
+6Tracked matches · now 2,906
−7.2ppWin rate · 92.9% → 85.7%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,034 +0 30 Aug – 6 Oct · 5 observations
3,0343,034peak 3,03430 Aug6 Oct
3,034Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-07-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,034
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 — 466 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-30
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-30

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJ0hnny30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO3,034csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning63
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY83–14–3Last 10083%Win rateLWWLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.08 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · +100ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 20

  • 17–3 · 85% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.9
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.3
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.06+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.06
Reaction time548ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 548ms
Headshot accuracy24.2%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 24.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.34Best match rating · 9–0 · debris, 22 Sept →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–9 · poseidon, 22 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 9–4 · debris, 16 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 28 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

14Longest win streak
9–1In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 100% over 9rush_001Weakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
debrisS3531–489%0.07
poseidonS1716–194%0.07
eldoradoS129–375%0.01
cacheS99–0100%0.05
infernoA74–357%0.03
rush_001C52–340%-0.03
anubis—43–175%0.03
nuke—32–167%0.06
mirage—32–167%0.04
ancient—22–0100%0.03
train—11–0100%0.02
overpass—11–0100%-0.03
dust2—11–0100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,598Matches
64%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
69.7ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
20Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient5855%1.0014.5
Mirage4957%1.0515.8
Anubis3253%0.9414.2
Inferno2959%0.9913.5
Cache14100%1.8015.4
Nuke1369%1.0813.7
Dust21275%1.1415.7
Overpass956%1.0712.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.5%Spray accuracy
75.3%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
521msReaction time
21.4%T opening success
62.4%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
10.2%Flash assists
6.87HE damage / grenade
11.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.4149% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
rush_0015–8-0.0629%11 Oct →
cache13–50.1527%8 Oct →
train9–20.0244%8 Oct →
rush_0011–5-0.090%8 Oct →
rush_0018–50.070%8 Oct →
rush_0018–60.0514%6 Oct →
debris9–7-0.0417%4 Oct →
debris9–4-0.0623%4 Oct →
rush_0010–4-0.1520%1 Oct →
debris9–50.0644%28 Sept →
debris9–30.0518%28 Sept →
poseidon9–70.0536%28 Sept →
poseidon9–00.2819%28 Sept →
debris9–30.0123%28 Sept →
debris9–40.1214%28 Sept →
debris9–20.2412%28 Sept →
cache13–3-0.0122%26 Sept →
anubis13–50.0122%26 Sept →
overpass13–3-0.037%26 Sept →
poseidon9–30.0625%22 Sept →
debris9–20.0926%22 Sept →
debris9–00.3415%22 Sept →
debris9–50.0617%22 Sept →
poseidon0–9-0.11100%22 Sept →
debris9–70.0519%22 Sept →
eldorado9–40.0923%22 Sept →
debris9–10.1914%22 Sept →
poseidon9–10.1739%16 Sept →
debris9–10.1027%16 Sept →
debris9–50.0725%16 Sept →
debris9–40.1029%16 Sept →
debris9–10.2127%16 Sept →
eldorado9–7-0.0223%16 Sept →
eldorado6–9-0.1035%16 Sept →
debris9–00.2828%13 Sept →
debris9–40.0217%13 Sept →
eldorado9–4-0.016%13 Sept →
poseidon9–30.0027%10 Sept →
debris9–20.099%10 Sept →
poseidon9–70.0545%10 Sept →
nuke13–40.0436%7 Sept →
inferno13–90.0834%7 Sept →
poseidon9–1-0.040%6 Sept →
poseidon9–6-0.0527%6 Sept →
inferno7–130.0118%6 Sept →
cache13–60.1020%6 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0230%6 Sept →
ancient13–40.0234%5 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0031%5 Sept →
cache16–130.0223%5 Sept →
inferno13–40.0825%5 Sept →
anubis13–30.1043%4 Sept →
inferno3–00.030%4 Sept →
cache13–4-0.0146%4 Sept →
nuke13–10.1628%4 Sept →
anubis13–10.0324%4 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0027%4 Sept →
dust213–20.0838%4 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0217%3 Sept →
debris9–6-0.0221%3 Sept →
poseidon9–00.2221%3 Sept →
poseidon9–70.0214%3 Sept →
debris9–30.0620%3 Sept →
mirage12–120.0521%3 Sept →
inferno13–30.0014%3 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.019%3 Sept →
ancient13–20.0421%3 Sept →
eldorado9–10.0517%31 Aug →
debris9–30.1436%31 Aug →
poseidon9–50.0921%29 Aug →
debris9–10.1010%29 Aug →
debris9–00.3033%28 Aug →
poseidon9–60.0821%28 Aug →
cache13–00.1621%28 Aug →
eldorado7–90.0635%28 Aug →
debris0–9-0.140%28 Aug →
eldorado5–9-0.0515%27 Aug →
poseidon9–7-0.0612%27 Aug →
cache13–70.0418%11 Aug →
cache13–40.0415%11 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0028%10 Aug →
mirage13–30.0739%10 Aug →
eldorado9–60.0515%2 Aug →
debris9–30.1530%2 Aug →
debris9–40.116%2 Aug →
eldorado9–4-0.0324%2 Aug →
debris9–10.1629%2 Aug →
debris9–20.1221%31 Jul →
debris9–7-0.0614%31 Jul →
eldorado8–00.0520%31 Jul →
poseidon9–40.1921%31 Jul →
debris4–9-0.1225%31 Jul →
eldorado9–20.0413%29 Jul →
debris9–5-0.0914%29 Jul →
eldorado9–10.0024%29 Jul →
poseidon9–20.1133%29 Jul →
poseidon9–00.1735%29 Jul →
debris9–40.1120%29 Jul →
debris8–8-0.0816%29 Jul →
debris5–9-0.260%29 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

3K ELO Club1,000 Matches14-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.