BETONFINGER — CS2 Stats

76561197971203316[U:1:10937588]

3,420Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating16,988Purple band · top ~20.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#19070 of 34910 tracked

FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67

Positioning45

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–54–3Last 10043%Win rateLWWLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7

Aggression4.7

Utility5.7

Positioning4.5

Opening Duels0.3

Clutch5.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.79 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7

Positioning4.5

Utility5.7

Mechanics5.0

Opening Duels1.2

Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time584ms+66ms

first ⅓ avg 518ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms

Headshot accuracy17.2%+0.8%

first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — shelter 13–11

13–0Biggest win — inferno

6Longest win streak

6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 70% over 10cacheWeakest map · 27% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	D	19	6–13	32%	-0.02
inferno	A	15	9–6	60%	0.02
shelter	C	14	6–8	43%	0.02
ancient	C	13	5–8	38%	-0.02
cache	D	11	3–8	27%	-0.02
anubis	S	10	7–3	70%	0.00
nuke	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.01
mirage	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.00
debris	—	1	1–0	100%	0.12
eldorado	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,113Matches

51%Win rate

0.96Avg K/D

76.0ADR

36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

17Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	61	56%	1.00	15.1
Anubis	59	54%	1.01	14.3
Dust2	51	55%	1.02	15.1
Ancient	45	53%	0.85	13.2
Nuke	28	64%	1.22	15.2
Mirage	24	42%	0.93	12.8
Vertigo	10	40%	0.75	11.4
Overpass	4	100%	1.47	18.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy

35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.0%Spray accuracy

72.3%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

561msReaction time

22.6%T opening success

39.7%CT opening success

0.79Enemies flashed / flash

8.7%Flash assists

13.35HE damage / grenade

2.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 2.3888 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 22.5836% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	8–13	-0.07	15%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.13	28%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.08	8%	29 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.04	9%	29 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	27%	29 Aug →
nuke	1–13	-0.06	19%	28 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.02	11%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.02	11%	28 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.07	24%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.00	11%	28 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.00	14%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.08	15%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	15%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.02	12%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.03	13%	27 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	26%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.06	13%	27 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.04	8%	27 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	22%	27 Aug →
ancient	14–16	0.04	8%	27 Aug →
shelter	5–13	0.04	15%	26 Aug →
shelter	13–11	0.22	25%	26 Aug →
shelter	13–8	-0.01	18%	26 Aug →
debris	9–0	0.12	9%	26 Aug →
eldorado	7–9	-0.04	15%	26 Aug →
poseidon	7–9	-0.06	30%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.04	17%	26 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	6%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.06	14%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.01	42%	26 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.04	16%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.06	17%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.01	32%	26 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	21%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.03	20%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–0	0.03	42%	26 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	14%	26 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.03	26%	25 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.02	11%	25 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	27%	25 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	11%	25 Aug →
anubis	16–14	-0.00	13%	25 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.02	14%	25 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.01	20%	24 Aug →
inferno	5–13	0.03	15%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.06	13%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.01	8%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.05	10%	24 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.11	31%	24 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.05	17%	24 Aug →
anubis	16–12	-0.00	8%	24 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.01	19%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.05	8%	23 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.10	16%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	8%	23 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	29%	23 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	12%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.00	13%	23 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	9%	23 Aug →
shelter	3–13	-0.00	8%	23 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.09	4%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	11%	23 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.01	18%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.00	15%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.00	20%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.02	8%	23 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.07	16%	23 Aug →
shelter	2–13	0.01	21%	22 Aug →
shelter	11–13	-0.05	6%	22 Aug →
shelter	13–7	0.00	11%	22 Aug →
shelter	12–12	0.06	16%	22 Aug →
nuke	0–13	-0.06	0%	22 Aug →
ancient	0–4	-0.05	0%	22 Aug →
nuke	0–13	-0.04	23%	22 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	9%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.03	15%	22 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.02	24%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.04	19%	22 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.05	9%	22 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.07	31%	22 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.01	10%	22 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.00	11%	22 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	25%	22 Aug →
shelter	13–8	-0.05	19%	21 Aug →
shelter	13–4	0.03	17%	21 Aug →
shelter	12–12	0.09	22%	21 Aug →
shelter	12–9	0.04	22%	21 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.07	11%	10 Aug →
shelter	5–13	-0.07	19%	9 Aug →
shelter	8–13	-0.01	23%	9 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	23%	9 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	12%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–16	-0.01	16%	9 Aug →
inferno	7–2	0.08	18%	9 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.07	20%	9 Aug →
boulder	5–13	0.02	11%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.03	21%	8 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.03	18%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.03	18%	7 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.00	19%	7 Aug →