Steven

Steven — CS2 Stats

76561197971139721[U:1:10873993]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

398Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,535Top 25% of 212,695 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#49551 of 259598 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,535 +3,842 20 Feb – 30 Oct · 24 days played
16,44423,163peak 23,16320 Feb30 Oct
23,533Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-02-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 628 below peak (23,163)
  • -150 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,465 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStevenPREMIER22,535 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning59
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateLWWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · +36ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility5.7
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 59% on T to 39% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.9
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time583ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–4 · cache, 24 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 5–0 · cache, 11 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 5–0 · cache, 11 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 8 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
3–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 87% over 15mirageWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2311–1248%-0.01
anubisC238–1535%-0.03
cacheS1513–287%0.01
ancientB147–750%0.01
mirageD91–811%-0.01
overpassB63–350%-0.02
dust2C52–340%0.01
inferno—42–250%-0.01
boulder—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

76Matches
61%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
60.1ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno475%0.828.3
Nuke367%0.7311.0
Anubis333%0.7814.3
Ancient3100%0.8311.0
Cache1100%0.565.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
84.7%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
578msReaction time
59.1%T opening success
38.6%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
9.51HE damage / grenade
4.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.6329% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–130.0019%30 Oct →
dust213–60.019%30 Oct →
cache16–140.0414%29 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0017%29 Oct →
nuke16–13-0.028%26 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0012%26 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0426%26 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0815%26 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0617%26 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0424%25 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0221%25 Oct →
mirage13–80.037%25 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.079%24 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0116%24 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0126%24 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0215%24 Oct →
cache13–40.1116%24 Oct →
nuke3–130.028%23 Oct →
cache9–20.0615%23 Oct →
nuke7–130.0116%23 Oct →
ancient13–90.0519%23 Oct →
cache13–60.0214%23 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.1117%23 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0221%23 Oct →
dust213–100.0019%23 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0328%16 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0516%16 Oct →
nuke13–90.0314%16 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0221%3 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0520%3 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.105%3 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0723%2 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0229%24 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0417%24 Sept →
dust212–120.0820%23 Sept →
anubis13–50.0131%20 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0519%17 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0415%17 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0519%14 Sept →
boulder13–100.0422%14 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0714%11 Sept →
nuke13–70.0321%11 Sept →
cache5–00.0550%11 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0526%11 Sept →
cache13–60.0138%11 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0622%9 Sept →
ancient13–110.0926%9 Sept →
cache16–140.0426%2 Sept →
nuke13–80.0114%2 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0425%22 Aug →
ancient13–30.0814%22 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0419%21 Aug →
anubis13–16-0.0416%21 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0410%19 Aug →
anubis7–130.0015%19 Aug →
cache13–80.0231%13 Aug →
ancient13–20.1015%13 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0114%13 Aug →
cache13–60.0525%4 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0512%30 Jul →
nuke9–130.0416%30 Jul →
cache5–130.0122%30 Jul →
cache13–60.0018%12 Jul →
anubis16–130.0011%12 Jul →
inferno13–20.0931%5 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0629%5 Jul →
overpass10–130.0222%5 Jul →
ancient13–80.0430%20 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.0318%20 Jun →
overpass13–100.0120%20 Jun →
anubis6–13-0.0821%8 Jun →
nuke13–10.1112%8 Jun →
ancient11–130.0217%8 Jun →
overpass8–13-0.0335%9 May →
nuke1–13-0.0926%9 May →
anubis11–13-0.0519%9 May →
cache13–10-0.0318%8 May →
nuke8–13-0.088%23 Apr →
nuke13–6-0.0029%19 Apr →
anubis13–60.0110%25 Mar →
ancient7–13-0.0123%25 Mar →
mirage7–130.0228%21 Mar →
nuke0–13-0.0417%21 Mar →
anubis10–13-0.0116%21 Mar →
nuke13–5-0.0621%6 Mar →
anubis13–80.0329%5 Mar →
mirage3–13-0.0128%5 Mar →
anubis13–4-0.0424%2 Mar →
nuke13–6-0.0422%2 Mar →
nuke13–30.0929%20 Feb →
overpass13–10-0.0423%20 Feb →
nuke7–130.0814%20 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.0610%18 Feb →
inferno4–13-0.0714%18 Feb →
overpass10–13-0.0430%18 Feb →
anubis13–5-0.0516%18 Feb →
ancient10–13-0.0519%18 Feb →
overpass16–13-0.0617%12 Feb →
anubis11–13-0.0419%8 Feb →
ancient13–60.0523%8 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.