habbi

habbi — CS2 Stats

BG76561197970596659[U:1:10330931]Steam profile ↗

4,450Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating27,598Top 5% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#847 of 32354 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,061 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhabbiFACEITLevel 10 · 3,061 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER27,598 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning61
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY65323Last 10065%Win rateLLWLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6
Aggression9.3
Utility3.0
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.1
Utility3.0
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time555ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 582ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 25.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — inferno 9–5
130Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
44In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 100% over 6dust2Weakest map · 50% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS42281467%0.01
dust2B189950%0.01
infernoA85363%0.06
trainS660100%0.05
mirageS64267%0.02
ancient440100%0.02
anubis440100%-0.02
nuke41325%0.04
vertigo32167%-0.04
overpass32167%0.04
office1010%0.01
warden1010%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,079Matches
56%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
76.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
26Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust247951%1.1915.9
Anubis41653%1.1116.0
Mirage27052%1.1014.1
Ancient25255%1.1415.3
Inferno16456%1.2716.7
Nuke11954%1.1014.9
Overpass5760%1.2215.7
Train5446%1.0516.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
84.4%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
549msReaction time
38.5%T opening success
60.3%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
5.81HE damage / grenade
3.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4344 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.4635% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office9–130.0126%14 Aug
dust213–16-0.0235%11 Aug
dust213–8-0.0328%8 Aug
dust211–13-0.0418%6 Aug
inferno13–90.0436%6 Aug
ancient13–10.0713%6 Aug
anubis13–50.0313%6 Aug
cache13–80.0126%5 Aug
dust213–60.0419%5 Aug
dust29–13-0.0124%4 Aug
dust213–8-0.0319%30 Jul
vertigo13–8-0.0115%29 Jul
dust213–10.0614%26 Jul
vertigo13–3-0.0417%26 Jul
nuke13–40.0420%26 Jul
train13–70.0736%26 Jul
cache10–130.0325%25 Jul
inferno7–90.0014%25 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0225%22 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0316%22 Jul
ancient13–70.0310%17 Jul
cache13–10-0.0317%17 Jul
nuke10–130.0920%17 Jul
dust213–100.0220%15 Jul
inferno13–70.0315%14 Jul
inferno9–40.0928%14 Jul
inferno9–50.1937%12 Jul
nuke5–130.0822%11 Jul
nuke1–5-0.0544%5 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0123%5 Jul
dust213–160.0933%5 Jul
mirage9–130.0024%5 Jul
inferno8–130.0626%4 Jul
dust213–60.0923%4 Jul
mirage8–130.0115%4 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0513%2 Jul
cache1–13-0.0631%2 Jul
cache13–20.0320%2 Jul
dust212–12-0.0621%2 Jul
dust213–50.0348%29 Jun
mirage13–00.0922%29 Jun
ancient13–80.0116%25 Jun
inferno4–90.0646%24 Jun
cache5–13-0.0925%23 Jun
dust22–13-0.0922%23 Jun
dust29–130.0126%22 Jun
cache13–2-0.0214%22 Jun
cache2–50.0132%22 Jun
overpass5–90.0522%22 Jun
dust213–100.0233%22 Jun
train13–10-0.0117%22 Jun
mirage13–110.0130%22 Jun
cache13–9-0.0217%21 Jun
train13–20.0635%21 Jun
train13–80.0319%21 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0329%21 Jun
dust212–120.0532%21 Jun
dust213–6-0.0235%20 Jun
mirage13–50.0747%20 Jun
cache13–20.0620%20 Jun
warden3–130.1016%20 Jun
train13–20.1318%20 Jun
cache13–70.0619%18 Jun
cache13–5-0.0318%18 Jun
cache12–12-0.0030%18 Jun
cache13–4-0.0116%17 Jun
cache13–70.0116%17 Jun
cache6–80.0513%16 Jun
cache10–130.0328%16 Jun
cache13–110.0231%15 Jun
cache13–00.0529%15 Jun
cache0–13-0.0150%15 Jun
cache13–80.0213%15 Jun
cache13–30.0547%14 Jun
cache5–13-0.0114%14 Jun
cache13–70.1018%14 Jun
overpass13–40.0419%14 Jun
cache11–130.0418%13 Jun
cache4–1-0.0675%13 Jun
cache13–10.0514%13 Jun
cache13–100.0321%12 Jun
cache13–11-0.0518%12 Jun
cache4–13-0.0228%12 Jun
vertigo5–9-0.0611%12 Jun
cache13–60.0016%12 Jun
cache13–10.0442%11 Jun
cache13–20.1320%11 Jun
dust20–60.0236%10 Jun
train13–3-0.0122%10 Jun
cache13–70.1422%10 Jun
cache13–100.0526%10 Jun
cache9–130.0221%9 Jun
cache13–40.1039%9 Jun
cache8–13-0.0220%9 Jun
cache13–60.0036%9 Jun
inferno13–40.0318%8 Jun
cache13–9-0.087%8 Jun
cache13–2-0.0334%8 Jun
cache10–130.0224%7 Jun
overpass13–110.0413%7 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →