flat6ixᶫᵒᵛᵉ

flat6ixᶫᵒᵛᵉ — CS2 Stats

76561197969735966[U:1:9470238]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

175Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating13,443Blue band · top ~36.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Apr 2026 (147 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 56 days played since 23 May 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,443 +500 24 May23 Apr · 36 days played
11,72314,999peak 14,99924 May23 Apr
15,000Peak Premier in tracked matches
56Days played since 2025-05-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,556 below peak (14,999)
  • -189 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,557 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGflat6ixᶫᵒᵛᵉFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER13,443 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning40
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50464Last 10050%Win rateWLWLLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.3pp headshot accuracy · +52ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 685ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 717ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 692ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility4.2
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch1.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 690ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.0
Utility4.2
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time691ms+18ms
first ⅓ avg 673ms → last ⅓ avg 691ms
Headshot accuracy25.9%+5.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 25.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 25 Mar
45%Best headshot accuracy · 3–9 · poseidon, 11 Apr
500msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · warden, 14 Apr
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 27 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 82% over 11anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB20101050%-0.02
cacheB157847%0.01
dust2B136746%-0.01
mirageB126650%-0.02
nukeA116555%-0.02
ancientS119282%0.00
overpassC73443%-0.01
anubisD51420%-0.03
poseidon2020%-0.16
warden1010%-0.05
vertigo110100%0.04
sanctum1010%-0.09
train110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

164Matches
47%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
76.0ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
35%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke633%0.8813.7
Inferno580%0.8811.6
Mirage30%0.619.0
Ancient250%1.3620.5
Anubis10%1.1919.0
Train1100%1.2515.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.1%Headshot accuracy
31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.0%Spray accuracy
77.5%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
690msReaction time
22.5%T opening success
41.3%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
14.98HE damage / grenade
4.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.5175% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–6-0.0232%20 Jun
cache11–13-0.0233%10 Jun
cache13–7-0.0130%3 Jun
cache7–130.0431%7 May
cache1–5-0.0422%7 May
cache13–80.1013%7 May
cache11–130.0430%6 May
cache10–13-0.0114%5 May
cache13–100.0021%30 Apr
cache6–13-0.0719%30 Apr
cache6–130.0136%30 Apr
cache13–50.0819%30 Apr
cache13–3-0.0125%30 Apr
cache7–13-0.0039%29 Apr
cache13–40.0825%29 Apr
dust213–110.0338%23 Apr
nuke16–13-0.0027%20 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0325%19 Apr
mirage4–11-0.0517%19 Apr
warden9–13-0.0517%14 Apr
vertigo13–60.0440%14 Apr
dust29–13-0.0830%11 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0225%11 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0420%11 Apr
poseidon3–9-0.1545%11 Apr
ancient13–80.0423%11 Apr
dust213–9-0.0426%11 Apr
anubis13–110.0224%10 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0219%10 Apr
ancient8–00.0221%9 Apr
inferno9–5-0.0819%9 Apr
dust210–130.0326%8 Apr
mirage6–130.0324%8 Apr
poseidon4–9-0.1713%7 Apr
inferno8–8-0.0313%7 Apr
nuke16–120.0124%6 Apr
inferno1–11-0.130%6 Apr
inferno14–16-0.0015%5 Apr
ancient1–130.0527%5 Apr
overpass13–7-0.0022%5 Apr
overpass8–80.0618%5 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0618%4 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0312%1 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0217%1 Apr
nuke5–9-0.0624%1 Apr
sanctum3–9-0.0917%31 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0613%30 Mar
overpass6–13-0.0613%29 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0218%27 Mar
ancient13–1-0.0318%27 Mar
dust213–80.0227%25 Mar
inferno9–60.0435%25 Mar
inferno9–30.1022%25 Mar
nuke14–16-0.0713%24 Mar
mirage7–130.0230%23 Mar
mirage13–60.0136%23 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0436%21 Mar
dust214–16-0.0523%21 Mar
dust215–150.0118%21 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0635%20 Mar
inferno9–50.0543%19 Mar
dust213–2-0.0244%19 Mar
overpass13–8-0.0125%19 Mar
inferno3–13-0.1026%18 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0025%17 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0230%17 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0624%15 Mar
overpass9–13-0.0533%14 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0526%14 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0512%14 Mar
nuke13–6-0.0618%14 Mar
overpass13–100.0121%14 Mar
nuke11–130.0319%13 Mar
nuke13–50.0535%12 Mar
overpass10–13-0.0432%11 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0625%9 Mar
dust210–13-0.0514%8 Mar
inferno15–15-0.0519%7 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0623%7 Mar
dust20–13-0.0322%7 Mar
ancient13–100.0028%7 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0028%4 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0024%29 Jun
inferno16–13-0.0223%18 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0316%11 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0219%11 Jun
ancient4–4-0.0143%10 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0319%10 Jun
ancient13–90.039%10 Jun
mirage13–80.0621%9 Jun
train13–110.029%5 Jun
inferno13–100.0410%4 Jun
inferno14–160.0314%2 Jun
dust211–13-0.0211%31 May
inferno13–110.0214%30 May
ancient13–70.0218%29 May
dust213–40.0920%29 May
mirage7–13-0.0913%27 May
dust213–8-0.0320%24 May
mirage16–120.0416%23 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →