zwanni

zwanni — CS2 Stats

DE76561197967830024[U:1:7564296]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,249Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,023Top 25% of 203,724 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#30830 of 251079 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,941 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,023 -1,347 30 Jul – 28 Sept · 32 days played
23,05825,656peak 25,65630 Jul28 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,941 +0 31 Aug – 1 Sept · 2 observations
1,9411,941peak 1,94131 Aug1 Sept
25,715Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,941Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-07-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,941
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 60 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,633 below peak (25,656)
  • +839 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 977 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzwanniFACEITLevel 10 · 1,941 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,023 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,941csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning62
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–56–4Last 10040%Win rateWWLLWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · −40ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility6.6
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch4.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.82 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.2
Utility6.6
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time526ms+16ms
first ⅓ avg 510ms → last ⅓ avg 526ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 17 Sept →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · cache, 12 Aug →
344msFastest reaction time · 16–13 · anubis, 15 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 7 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
W2Current streak
1–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 6mirageWeakest map · 0% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD237–1630%0.03
dust2C2310–1343%0.02
anubisB147–750%0.03
ancientA149–564%0.04
cacheD113–827%0.02
mirageD90–90%-0.02
nukeS64–267%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 9). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,028Matches
51%Win rate
1.30Avg K/D
85.0ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno25357%1.3318.2
Ancient17653%1.3718.6
Dust215949%1.2917.3
Anubis11843%1.2118.6
Nuke7548%1.2117.8
Overpass1937%1.2019.2
Train1436%1.2515.9
Mirage650%0.9613.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
522msReaction time
38.1%T opening success
50.4%CT opening success
0.82Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
9.53HE damage / grenade
11.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.0798% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–5-0.0015%7 Oct →
ancient13–10.1214%7 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0119%28 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0417%28 Sept →
anubis13–90.0419%28 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0113%27 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0630%27 Sept →
ancient13–60.1323%27 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0019%27 Sept →
anubis9–130.039%27 Sept →
ancient13–60.0312%26 Sept →
nuke16–130.048%26 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0526%26 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0428%26 Sept →
ancient13–80.0316%26 Sept →
ancient3–130.0034%25 Sept →
dust26–130.0321%25 Sept →
ancient13–20.0516%25 Sept →
dust213–30.0926%25 Sept →
ancient11–130.019%25 Sept →
anubis13–80.0221%25 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0030%24 Sept →
dust28–130.0422%24 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0324%23 Sept →
anubis13–60.0220%20 Sept →
mirage9–130.0412%18 Sept →
cache11–130.0726%18 Sept →
dust27–130.0535%18 Sept →
inferno15–150.0919%18 Sept →
ancient7–130.0017%17 Sept →
inferno11–130.0318%17 Sept →
dust213–30.2121%17 Sept →
inferno0–13-0.0813%17 Sept →
inferno9–130.0412%13 Sept →
anubis13–50.099%13 Sept →
anubis13–20.1220%12 Sept →
nuke9–130.0019%12 Sept →
ancient13–100.0317%12 Sept →
inferno10–130.0321%12 Sept →
dust216–120.0113%12 Sept →
inferno13–60.0913%12 Sept →
inferno15–150.0616%10 Sept →
mirage7–130.0023%8 Sept →
nuke13–20.0620%8 Sept →
inferno12–160.0216%6 Sept →
inferno13–60.068%4 Sept →
dust213–60.1322%4 Sept →
inferno12–160.0622%4 Sept →
nuke13–80.1422%4 Sept →
inferno15–150.0818%3 Sept →
ancient9–130.0917%29 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0617%29 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0315%29 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0320%26 Aug →
inferno12–160.0221%23 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0519%22 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0722%22 Aug →
cache13–160.0522%21 Aug →
dust26–130.0216%21 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0115%21 Aug →
dust213–80.0521%21 Aug →
anubis8–130.0017%15 Aug →
dust27–130.0019%15 Aug →
inferno13–70.048%15 Aug →
dust213–80.0721%15 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0215%15 Aug →
anubis16–130.0513%15 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0329%14 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0610%14 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0414%14 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0225%14 Aug →
nuke13–80.0313%12 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0137%12 Aug →
inferno13–100.0617%9 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0527%9 Aug →
inferno8–130.0211%9 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0215%7 Aug →
dust26–13-0.088%7 Aug →
anubis9–130.0124%7 Aug →
ancient13–100.0724%6 Aug →
dust213–100.0625%6 Aug →
inferno13–90.1320%6 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0420%2 Aug →
dust26–130.0531%2 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.0315%1 Aug →
inferno16–130.0218%1 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0218%1 Aug →
cache15–15-0.0021%1 Aug →
anubis13–160.0611%1 Aug →
ancient13–100.1118%31 Jul →
dust27–130.0118%31 Jul →
cache13–20.1729%31 Jul →
cache13–60.0631%31 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0517%31 Jul →
anubis1–13-0.0218%31 Jul →
cache13–80.0119%31 Jul →
inferno10–130.0516%31 Jul →
cache5–130.0121%31 Jul →
dust213–80.0318%31 Jul →
dust213–90.0630%30 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.