Brilliance

Brilliance — CS2 Stats

BY76561197967402670[U:1:7136942]Steam profile ↗

2,652Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPassive Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#5313 of 6700 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,748 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

3,748Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,748
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 252 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBrillianceFACEITLevel 10 · 3,748 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,748csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning51
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT4951Last 10049%Win rateWWLWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.7
Aggression4.2
Utility6.4
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch4.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.5° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.1
Utility6.4
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time538ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%−4.9%
first ⅓ avg 27.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — dust2 13–2
132Biggest win — anubis
6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
18Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 15nukeWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B29141548%0.00
anubisC1981142%-0.04
infernoS1510567%-0.00
nukeC145936%-0.04
mirageA138562%-0.02
overpassB63350%0.01
cache31233%-0.00
ancient1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

8,570Matches
54%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
87.2ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis38656%1.2317.4
Mirage36055%1.1317.1
Dust235664%1.1717.1
Ancient33457%1.2016.7
Nuke13056%1.2117.1
Overpass11365%1.2518.9
Inferno9053%1.1817.7
Vertigo5652%1.1115.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.8%Headshot accuracy
38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.8%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
538msReaction time
29.7%T opening success
38.9%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
6.48HE damage / grenade
16.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.6812% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–70.0429%25 Aug
dust213–60.0428%25 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0513%23 Aug
dust213–70.0425%23 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0721%23 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0120%21 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0615%21 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0828%18 Aug
anubis13–2-0.0227%18 Aug
dust213–70.0330%18 Aug
cache5–130.0124%18 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0638%18 Aug
cache13–16-0.0422%17 Aug
anubis13–90.0010%17 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0028%16 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0713%16 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0315%16 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0231%16 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0123%16 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0225%13 Aug
dust219–220.0327%13 Aug
inferno6–130.0417%12 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0320%12 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0218%12 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0528%7 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0417%7 Aug
dust216–120.0024%6 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0216%6 Aug
dust23–13-0.0726%4 Aug
anubis19–17-0.0127%4 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0524%4 Aug
anubis13–2-0.0125%2 Aug
dust210–13-0.0313%2 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0318%2 Aug
dust213–60.0130%31 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0432%31 Jul
dust27–13-0.0118%30 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0913%30 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0722%29 Jul
dust29–13-0.0723%29 Jul
dust213–60.0230%28 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0229%28 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0220%28 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0325%27 Jul
anubis17–19-0.0724%27 Jul
cache13–30.0218%27 Jul
dust213–7-0.0611%27 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0229%22 Jul
dust214–16-0.0427%13 Jul
inferno8–130.0223%13 Jul
mirage13–40.0317%12 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0820%9 Jul
dust211–13-0.0218%9 Jul
dust213–100.0036%4 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0628%15 Jun
dust29–13-0.0315%15 Jun
inferno12–16-0.0323%15 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0343%13 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0216%13 Jun
dust216–120.0635%13 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0418%11 Jun
dust213–16-0.0220%10 Jun
overpass13–70.0528%10 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0821%10 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0719%9 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0718%9 Jun
nuke13–80.0239%9 Jun
overpass2–13-0.0733%9 Jun
dust29–130.0923%9 Jun
overpass16–19-0.0232%8 Jun
dust213–8-0.0430%8 Jun
inferno13–70.0526%8 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0132%6 Jun
dust22–13-0.0533%6 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0444%6 Jun
dust28–130.0128%5 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0024%5 Jun
overpass19–220.0318%5 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0423%3 Jun
dust25–13-0.0525%3 Jun
mirage22–180.0323%31 May
dust213–30.0321%31 May
inferno13–7-0.0525%26 May
anubis13–11-0.0026%26 May
overpass13–90.0427%25 May
mirage13–10-0.0225%25 May
dust23–13-0.0324%26 Apr
mirage11–130.0127%26 Apr
dust213–20.1730%26 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0329%26 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0117%26 Apr
mirage13–80.0145%26 Apr
dust29–13-0.0128%26 Apr
inferno13–40.0632%25 Apr
dust213–8-0.0323%25 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0121%25 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0338%25 Apr
dust216–130.0426%24 Apr
mirage10–130.0032%24 Apr
overpass16–130.0218%24 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →