PP UP

PP UP — CS2 Stats

US76561197967146018[U:1:6880290]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,078Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating9,999Light Blue band · top ~54.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,999 -1,754 14 Sept – 14 Oct · 25 days played
9,08511,906peak 11,90614 Sept14 Oct
12,741Peak Premier in tracked matches
25Days played since 2026-09-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,907 below peak (11,906)
  • -1,754 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPP UPFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER9,999 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51
Positioning66
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–48–4Last 10048%Win rateWWWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +4.5pp headshot accuracy · +16ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 647ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 670ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 661ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim5.1
Utility3.9
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels5.0
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 631ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1
Positioning6.6
Utility3.9
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels6.6
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time647ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 639ms → last ⅓ avg 647ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 8 Oct →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · inferno, 19 Sept →
445msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · dust2, 28 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 9 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
13–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

poseidonBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2410–1442%0.02
nukeA169–756%0.05
ancientD144–1029%0.01
mirageB115–645%0.01
infernoA95–456%0.04
anubisS86–275%0.01
cacheD72–529%0.01
poseidonS54–180%0.08
eldorado—21–150%0.00
debris—21–150%0.00
vertigo—21–150%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

26Matches
50%Win rate
0.83Avg K/D
74.4ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage520%0.7212.2
Ancient560%1.3019.2
Dust2450%0.6212.0
Nuke3100%1.1920.0
Anubis2100%0.7812.0
Cache20%0.406.5
Inferno1100%0.8612.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.1%Spray accuracy
72.3%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
631msReaction time
61.9%T opening success
51.1%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
2.5%Flash assists
8.19HE damage / grenade
3.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.9143 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–110.1119%14 Oct →
anubis13–70.0313%14 Oct →
nuke13–70.0729%14 Oct →
eldorado7–9-0.0218%14 Oct →
debris9–40.2233%14 Oct →
nuke6–90.0824%14 Oct →
anubis6–130.0111%14 Oct →
poseidon9–20.1016%9 Oct →
vertigo6–9-0.0419%9 Oct →
dust29–130.0130%9 Oct →
anubis13–00.0722%9 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0411%8 Oct →
nuke13–40.2320%8 Oct →
anubis2–0-0.090%8 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0916%7 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0211%7 Oct →
nuke5–12-0.0427%6 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0413%6 Oct →
dust211–130.0430%5 Oct →
dust216–130.0719%4 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0023%4 Oct →
nuke13–60.0133%4 Oct →
mirage13–110.0423%4 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0524%4 Oct →
anubis13–110.0622%4 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0215%4 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0226%4 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0524%3 Oct →
debris2–9-0.2213%2 Oct →
poseidon9–60.1611%2 Oct →
inferno10–130.0217%2 Oct →
dust24–130.0321%1 Oct →
mirage13–60.1419%30 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0520%30 Sept →
eldorado9–40.0320%30 Sept →
dust213–90.1325%30 Sept →
poseidon8–80.087%30 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0512%30 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0120%29 Sept →
nuke13–90.0212%29 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0414%29 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0620%29 Sept →
cache11–130.0517%29 Sept →
mirage13–110.0319%29 Sept →
inferno13–70.0622%29 Sept →
dust213–60.0722%29 Sept →
mirage13–70.0627%28 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0225%28 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0721%28 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0429%28 Sept →
ancient10–130.0419%28 Sept →
inferno13–100.0333%28 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0519%28 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0122%27 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0218%27 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.037%27 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0421%27 Sept →
mirage13–20.1116%27 Sept →
cache13–110.004%27 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0115%27 Sept →
nuke11–130.0220%27 Sept →
cache10–130.0413%26 Sept →
ancient13–90.1220%26 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0312%26 Sept →
dust213–10.1631%26 Sept →
anubis16–140.0923%26 Sept →
dust213–70.0922%25 Sept →
dust213–100.0818%25 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0215%25 Sept →
dust213–40.0518%25 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0122%24 Sept →
nuke13–60.0420%24 Sept →
dust212–160.0423%24 Sept →
nuke9–60.0211%24 Sept →
vertigo9–30.1038%24 Sept →
poseidon9–60.0228%24 Sept →
nuke13–30.1522%24 Sept →
ancient13–40.0815%23 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0028%23 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0313%22 Sept →
poseidon9–30.0421%22 Sept →
cache13–20.0312%19 Sept →
ancient4–130.0211%19 Sept →
inferno6–130.0738%19 Sept →
ancient13–90.0219%19 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0812%19 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0018%18 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0113%18 Sept →
nuke13–110.0814%18 Sept →
inferno13–40.0614%18 Sept →
nuke9–40.1814%18 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.046%18 Sept →
inferno6–130.0022%17 Sept →
nuke2–130.0213%16 Sept →
inferno10–130.0514%15 Sept →
ancient16–140.0111%15 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0412%14 Sept →
ancient11–130.0319%14 Sept →
cache15–150.0213%14 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0813%14 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.