ninjaDax

ninjaDax — CS2 Stats

DK76561197966821669[U:1:6555941]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

954Tracked matches40%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,032Purple band · top ~20.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,476 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (43 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 954 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,032 -3,629 24 Apr – 13 Sept · 5 days played
17,03220,661peak 20,66124 Apr13 Sept
20,661Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,476Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2026-04-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,476
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 55 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,629 below peak (20,661)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,968 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGninjaDaxFACEITLevel 7 · 1,476 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER17,032 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,476csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning37
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–49–1Last 10050%Win rateWLLLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.7pp headshot accuracy · +48ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility6.3
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning3.7
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time607ms−63ms
first ⅓ avg 670ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%−3.6%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 22 May →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · inferno, 13 May →
469msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · cache, 13 May →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 4 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
5–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 63% over 8mirageWeakest map · 44% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2110–1148%0.02
mirageC167–944%-0.02
dust2B136–746%0.00
ancientB136–746%-0.02
cacheB126–650%0.02
nukeA116–555%0.03
overpassA85–363%-0.01
anubis—33–0100%-0.03
vertigo—10–10%-0.08
poseidon—10–10%0.04
sanctum—11–0100%0.21

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

281Matches
58%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
80.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5556%1.0916.3
Mirage5250%1.0014.2
Dust23462%1.1516.3
Nuke3476%1.2815.8
Overpass3468%1.1213.6
Ancient2752%0.8714.4
Train1258%1.1812.8
Cache743%1.0314.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.0%Spray accuracy
76.0%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
604msReaction time
24.5%T opening success
32.8%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
11.17HE damage / grenade
12.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.5475% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust219–160.0022%31 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0515%26 Aug →
dust29–13-0.056%24 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0027%21 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0329%21 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0614%20 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.0424%16 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0512%14 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0619%14 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0121%14 Aug →
inferno13–100.0823%12 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0314%9 Aug →
nuke13–90.0410%9 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.038%9 Aug →
mirage14–160.0218%8 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.0415%7 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0520%6 Aug →
dust213–90.0421%6 Aug →
vertigo5–13-0.0810%6 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0413%6 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0222%4 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0615%4 Aug →
inferno13–10.0513%4 Aug →
mirage13–80.0618%2 Aug →
inferno6–130.0423%2 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0720%2 Aug →
dust29–13-0.017%31 Jul →
inferno11–130.0314%31 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0425%29 Jul →
cache13–70.0326%29 Jul →
dust213–90.0416%28 Jul →
inferno9–130.0030%27 Jul →
mirage16–12-0.0220%26 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0111%26 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.058%26 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0316%26 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0221%26 Jul →
ancient16–130.0223%24 Jul →
cache13–50.1118%24 Jul →
anubis13–6-0.0129%24 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0015%18 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0317%18 Jul →
dust213–110.0414%12 Jul →
inferno13–10.0033%6 Jul →
cache13–40.0315%6 Jul →
inferno14–16-0.0615%5 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0420%5 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0011%5 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0524%5 Jul →
inferno13–30.1029%5 Jul →
dust211–130.0628%5 Jul →
nuke4–90.0016%5 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0229%29 Jun →
overpass11–13-0.0022%29 Jun →
nuke11–130.0023%29 Jun →
anubis13–10-0.0520%24 Jun →
inferno15–15-0.0121%19 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0023%18 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0232%18 Jun →
mirage13–80.0318%5 Jun →
anubis16–12-0.0210%4 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0615%3 Jun →
overpass3–13-0.0722%3 Jun →
cache13–70.0417%3 Jun →
cache10–13-0.0328%28 May →
ancient6–13-0.0013%28 May →
nuke5–90.0815%23 May →
inferno9–20.1526%23 May →
inferno4–130.0837%23 May →
overpass13–90.0123%23 May →
poseidon7–90.0428%22 May →
sanctum9–40.2128%22 May →
nuke9–10.2913%22 May →
inferno9–10.1329%22 May →
dust210–130.0432%22 May →
ancient16–120.0232%20 May →
mirage13–10-0.048%20 May →
nuke10–13-0.0924%20 May →
overpass13–110.0619%15 May →
cache9–130.1023%15 May →
inferno11–13-0.0715%13 May →
inferno13–20.1639%13 May →
cache13–100.0312%13 May →
overpass13–10-0.0024%8 May →
overpass13–60.0312%8 May →
cache13–60.0324%8 May →
dust213–110.0216%7 May →
cache10–13-0.0416%5 May →
nuke13–70.0220%5 May →
ancient1–13-0.117%3 May →
overpass11–13-0.046%3 May →
mirage9–13-0.0628%2 May →
nuke16–13-0.0323%25 Apr →
inferno13–11-0.0520%24 Apr →
nuke13–100.0129%24 Apr →
ancient16–12-0.0419%22 Apr →
inferno13–60.0426%22 Apr →
ancient13–100.0124%20 Apr →
overpass13–8-0.059%20 Apr →
ancient22–200.0018%19 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.