Strikerke

Strikerke — CS2 Stats

76561197964683031[U:1:4417303]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

814Tracked matches55%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating2,471Grey band · top ~89.5% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 2,471 +2 9 Sept – 2 Oct · 21 days played
1,4262,471peak 2,4719 Sept2 Oct
2,471Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-09-09

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 2,471
  • +2 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 — 2,529 to go

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStrikerkePREMIER2,471 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning57
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–54–1Last 10045%Win rateWWWLLLWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · +34ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 764ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 738ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 721ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim5.5
Utility6.7
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 695ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning5.7
Utility6.7
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time690ms+49ms
first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 690ms
Headshot accuracy13.6%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 13.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–6 · dust2, 20 Sept →
25%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 17 Sept →
461msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 19 Sept →
13–3Biggest win · mirage, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 64% over 28ancientWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2818–1064%0.01
mirageB2512–1348%0.01
nukeC156–940%-0.00
infernoD123–925%-0.04
ancientD81–713%0.01
cacheB63–350%0.00
anubis—41–325%-0.01
office—10–10%-0.02
overpass—11–0100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.8%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.5%Spray accuracy
74.1%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
695msReaction time
37.4%T opening success
55.1%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
12.79HE damage / grenade
17.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.8015% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.44% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–110.0111%2 Oct →
dust213–50.0013%2 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0422%2 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0719%2 Oct →
office11–13-0.0223%2 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.1013%2 Oct →
cache13–90.027%2 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0014%1 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0418%1 Oct →
overpass13–7-0.0410%1 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0217%1 Oct →
dust213–11-0.047%1 Oct →
dust213–70.1115%30 Sept →
ancient8–130.0911%30 Sept →
anubis1–130.0820%29 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0719%29 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0017%28 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.049%28 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0512%28 Sept →
nuke12–160.0510%28 Sept →
mirage13–40.028%28 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0211%27 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.1518%27 Sept →
nuke4–9-0.1313%27 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.059%26 Sept →
mirage13–30.1417%26 Sept →
mirage9–130.0916%26 Sept →
inferno6–130.029%26 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0118%26 Sept →
dust213–4-0.016%26 Sept →
mirage13–70.0423%26 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0611%26 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.094%26 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0315%26 Sept →
dust213–10-0.063%26 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0512%25 Sept →
nuke13–100.0113%25 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.046%25 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0210%25 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0513%25 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0011%25 Sept →
cache9–130.1211%25 Sept →
dust22–130.0410%25 Sept →
ancient11–130.0212%25 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0314%24 Sept →
dust213–100.0218%24 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0514%24 Sept →
ancient13–80.066%24 Sept →
dust24–13-0.068%24 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.008%23 Sept →
mirage13–80.089%23 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0912%23 Sept →
cache8–13-0.078%22 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0613%22 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.036%22 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0010%22 Sept →
mirage13–30.164%21 Sept →
dust213–50.068%21 Sept →
mirage13–110.028%21 Sept →
mirage9–130.1115%20 Sept →
dust213–60.2021%20 Sept →
dust213–110.0112%20 Sept →
mirage10–130.0012%19 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.086%19 Sept →
nuke16–13-0.068%19 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0710%19 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0423%19 Sept →
mirage16–120.0917%18 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.044%18 Sept →
dust213–30.038%18 Sept →
nuke13–90.0515%18 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.050%17 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0715%17 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.048%17 Sept →
nuke5–130.0418%17 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0325%17 Sept →
nuke4–130.0015%16 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0316%16 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0118%16 Sept →
mirage3–130.0314%15 Sept →
dust213–70.0623%15 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0220%15 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0021%15 Sept →
mirage9–130.0812%14 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0410%14 Sept →
nuke13–30.1113%14 Sept →
dust29–130.0323%14 Sept →
nuke16–120.0319%14 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.017%13 Sept →
nuke6–130.0314%13 Sept →
mirage10–4-0.058%13 Sept →
dust214–160.0323%11 Sept →
dust29–130.039%11 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.046%11 Sept →
dust213–60.1117%11 Sept →
nuke13–60.106%10 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0112%10 Sept →
dust213–60.0420%10 Sept →
ancient9–130.0617%10 Sept →
dust210–130.0020%9 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.