NEWSENS

NEWSENS — CS2 Stats

US76561197964541856[U:1:4276128]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

7,131Tracked matches65%Win rate2020Tracked since
9,415Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,963 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (47 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,963 → 1,963
+96Tracked matches · now 7,131
−0.3ppWin rate · 65.5% → 65.2%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,963 +0 30 Aug – 2 Sept · 4 observations
1,9631,963peak 1,96330 Aug2 Sept
1,963Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,963
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 38 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches69——
Win rate38%——
K/D0.95——
Headshot %72%——

Measured 22 Sep 2026 → 19 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,654), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate65.9%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy14.4%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.881.071.090.21 short
Match win rate34.8%46.9%48.4%13.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNEWSENSFACEITLevel 9 · 1,963 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,963csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim96
Positioning41
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49–35–16Last 10049%Win rateWWTWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · +32ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 501ms

Last 20

  • 11–3–6 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 485ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim9.6
Utility6.1
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 96 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 56 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.6
Positioning4.1
Utility6.1
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time504ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 505ms → last ⅓ avg 504ms
Headshot accuracy24.9%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 25.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 11–0 · inferno, 11 Oct →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · ancient, 7 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · ancient, 28 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 12 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
4–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 56% over 16dust2Weakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2110–1148%0.07
mirageA169–756%0.03
dust2D144–1029%0.03
nukeB136–746%0.02
anubisA95–456%0.05
vertigoA95–456%0.06
ancientA95–456%0.03
cacheA95–456%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

425,765Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
14,158Matches
34.8%Match win rate
65.9%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 9 players
14.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
22,266MVPs
9,415Hours (in match)
27,396Bombs planted
5,443Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47226,315
Glock-1811,899
FAMAS8,339
AWP6,715
Knife5,332
MP95,123
P2505,098

Lifetime map wins

43,326inferno
20,791dust2
12,145nuke
7,530train
3,357vertigo
3,099cbble
34office
17lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,175Matches
51%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
71.3ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage27049%1.1514.6
Inferno17455%1.2716.1
Ancient17147%1.1716.2
Anubis11445%1.1115.9
Vertigo7758%1.2516.7
Dust25254%1.1114.1
Nuke4055%1.3117.1
Overpass2642%1.0413.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy
45.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.7%Spray accuracy
89.2%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
494msReaction time
34.9%T opening success
29.8%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
7.51HE damage / grenade
16.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4318 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.9498% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–50.0123%18 Oct →
dust213–30.0928%18 Oct →
dust212–120.0929%17 Oct →
dust213–100.0229%17 Oct →
vertigo3–100.0031%16 Oct →
ancient8–130.0017%16 Oct →
inferno13–80.0716%16 Oct →
nuke13–110.0519%16 Oct →
inferno13–50.0820%15 Oct →
anubis13–40.0930%15 Oct →
inferno13–70.1031%14 Oct →
inferno12–120.0322%13 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0314%12 Oct →
cache13–10.1135%12 Oct →
inferno12–120.0419%12 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.0118%12 Oct →
anubis12–120.0924%11 Oct →
mirage13–70.0323%11 Oct →
inferno11–00.2823%11 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0321%11 Oct →
ancient13–100.0220%4 Oct →
inferno13–50.2134%4 Oct →
mirage12–120.0143%3 Oct →
nuke2–130.0136%3 Oct →
cache13–40.0723%3 Oct →
vertigo13–40.1811%3 Oct →
dust210–130.0432%2 Oct →
dust29–11-0.0123%1 Oct →
mirage7–130.0237%1 Oct →
inferno9–130.0423%30 Sept →
inferno13–70.0831%30 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0921%28 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0216%28 Sept →
vertigo13–40.0728%28 Sept →
ancient13–10.0324%28 Sept →
cache0–10-0.0720%27 Sept →
anubis11–30.0410%27 Sept →
nuke4–130.0221%27 Sept →
dust212–120.0730%26 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0320%26 Sept →
inferno12–120.1221%26 Sept →
vertigo6–130.0131%26 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0224%24 Sept →
mirage13–30.0329%24 Sept →
inferno10–130.1116%23 Sept →
vertigo13–60.1134%23 Sept →
mirage13–110.0738%21 Sept →
nuke13–110.0221%21 Sept →
inferno13–90.0625%21 Sept →
mirage11–130.0633%21 Sept →
nuke10–130.0926%20 Sept →
anubis13–50.0432%19 Sept →
inferno8–130.0525%19 Sept →
inferno13–100.0937%18 Sept →
mirage13–10.0222%18 Sept →
anubis13–30.1129%18 Sept →
ancient8–130.0132%17 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0023%16 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0320%15 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0028%15 Sept →
ancient13–80.0823%13 Sept →
inferno13–80.0430%12 Sept →
ancient5–130.0137%12 Sept →
cache13–90.0217%12 Sept →
inferno13–00.0313%12 Sept →
mirage12–120.0722%12 Sept →
cache12–120.0823%12 Sept →
vertigo2–130.0330%11 Sept →
nuke13–100.0924%10 Sept →
ancient13–70.0525%10 Sept →
cache13–60.0523%10 Sept →
dust212–120.0720%10 Sept →
anubis12–12-0.0018%9 Sept →
mirage13–40.1318%9 Sept →
inferno6–130.0336%8 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0424%8 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0019%8 Sept →
dust213–100.0927%8 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0611%8 Sept →
anubis11–130.0929%7 Sept →
ancient13–90.0744%7 Sept →
vertigo13–80.0428%7 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0329%7 Sept →
mirage13–40.0536%6 Sept →
nuke13–10.0837%6 Sept →
inferno9–130.0723%6 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0433%5 Sept →
dust25–130.1028%5 Sept →
mirage13–20.0519%5 Sept →
cache13–90.0219%4 Sept →
vertigo2–13-0.0033%4 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0227%4 Sept →
nuke13–60.0326%4 Sept →
mirage13–40.0114%4 Sept →
dust25–130.0329%4 Sept →
vertigo13–10.1327%2 Sept →
inferno7–130.0118%1 Sept →
cache12–120.0126%1 Sept →
mirage13–90.0531%1 Sept →
dust20–6-0.0325%1 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.