sup

sup — CS2 Stats

JM76561197964375904[U:1:4110176]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,179Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating25,062Top 25% of 203,724 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19992 of 250891 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,179 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,062 +371 30 Jan – 24 Sept · 8 days played
24,69125,062peak 25,06230 Jan24 Sept
25,173Peak Premier in tracked matches
54Days played since 2024-01-26

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 25,062
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,938 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsupFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,062 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning51
Utility81

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–48Last 10052%Win rateLLWWLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.8 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility8.1
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 81 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.1
Utility8.1
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time522ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 574ms → last ⅓ avg 522ms
Headshot accuracy22.4%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 7 Feb →
48%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · mirage, 7 Feb →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · ancient, 21 May →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 7 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
17–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 19dust2Weakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3118–1358%0.03
ancientB209–1145%-0.01
anubisA1912–763%0.02
dust2C104–640%-0.00
nukeA74–357%0.00
overpass—41–325%-0.02
inferno—43–175%0.02
vertigo—41–325%0.00
train—10–10%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,182Matches
61%Win rate
1.35Avg K/D
77.9ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
19Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20551%1.2016.2
Ancient18653%1.1616.3
Dust214754%1.0815.6
Anubis14558%1.2116.6
Nuke6452%1.2016.4
Inferno5260%1.2216.5
Overpass2658%1.2315.5
Vertigo2143%1.1315.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
83.4%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
521msReaction time
20.5%T opening success
39.7%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
14.1%Flash assists
8.07HE damage / grenade
15.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.5076% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–130.059%1 Sept →
overpass6–13-0.1124%31 Jul →
overpass13–110.0531%31 Jul →
dust213–60.0029%25 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0213%17 Jul →
anubis22–200.0133%11 Jul →
anubis13–60.0120%11 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.0227%9 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0633%8 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0015%7 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0624%30 Jun →
ancient13–16-0.0414%25 Jun →
anubis13–50.0821%24 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0011%24 Jun →
dust213–30.0133%24 Jun →
mirage16–140.0829%24 Jun →
anubis13–70.065%23 Jun →
anubis13–90.1120%13 Jun →
dust213–16-0.0218%10 Jun →
mirage13–100.0525%10 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0722%3 Jun →
train4–13-0.0710%23 May →
anubis11–13-0.0016%23 May →
ancient13–5-0.0318%21 May →
ancient8–13-0.0019%24 Apr →
mirage13–110.0145%22 Apr →
anubis13–60.0528%16 Apr →
mirage13–110.0130%15 Apr →
ancient13–60.0029%4 Apr →
dust28–130.0019%28 Mar →
nuke10–130.0423%17 Mar →
ancient13–110.0221%17 Mar →
ancient8–13-0.0321%14 Mar →
inferno13–60.0423%12 Mar →
ancient8–13-0.0218%12 Mar →
mirage16–140.0023%10 Mar →
mirage14–16-0.0422%24 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0321%19 Feb →
ancient13–7-0.0023%6 Feb →
dust213–80.0324%20 Jan →
mirage13–110.0011%13 Jan →
anubis16–130.0524%9 Jan →
mirage14–16-0.0015%9 Jan →
anubis13–2-0.0217%18 Dec →
ancient13–50.0425%29 Apr →
mirage6–130.0721%5 Mar →
vertigo8–130.0119%4 Mar →
anubis9–13-0.0111%4 Mar →
mirage13–60.0136%2 Mar →
ancient12–160.0220%2 Mar →
mirage13–60.1332%2 Mar →
vertigo7–13-0.0220%2 Mar →
ancient16–130.0311%29 Feb →
ancient16–14-0.0515%29 Feb →
ancient5–13-0.0121%28 Feb →
vertigo6–13-0.0015%27 Feb →
inferno13–110.0120%27 Feb →
anubis13–90.0225%27 Feb →
mirage10–130.0626%27 Feb →
mirage13–80.0421%27 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0524%27 Feb →
anubis13–80.0514%27 Feb →
ancient9–13-0.0125%21 Feb →
overpass10–13-0.0218%19 Feb →
anubis6–13-0.0623%19 Feb →
nuke7–13-0.0512%19 Feb →
mirage10–130.028%17 Feb →
anubis13–80.0621%17 Feb →
ancient4–13-0.0823%17 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0128%17 Feb →
nuke11–13-0.0218%17 Feb →
ancient13–90.0114%17 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.0029%17 Feb →
mirage13–70.0624%17 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.0525%16 Feb →
overpass13–16-0.0014%13 Feb →
ancient13–110.0820%13 Feb →
nuke13–6-0.0032%13 Feb →
inferno5–13-0.0421%9 Feb →
mirage13–100.0527%9 Feb →
anubis8–130.0326%9 Feb →
nuke13–110.0637%9 Feb →
mirage22–200.0220%9 Feb →
anubis6–13-0.0122%9 Feb →
anubis10–130.0614%8 Feb →
mirage13–10.1948%7 Feb →
ancient8–13-0.0716%7 Feb →
mirage13–70.0122%7 Feb →
mirage10–13-0.0210%7 Feb →
mirage13–160.0732%2 Feb →
vertigo16–130.0418%1 Feb →
ancient9–130.0621%1 Feb →
mirage13–70.0522%1 Feb →
nuke13–100.0116%1 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0112%1 Feb →
anubis13–110.0616%1 Feb →
mirage13–9-0.0231%30 Jan →
ancient20–22-0.0518%30 Jan →
mirage13–110.1420%29 Jan →
inferno13–100.0528%26 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.