Taken

Taken — CS2 Stats

US76561197964152876[U:1:3887148]Steam profile ↗

2,211Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTakenFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning61
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46522Last 10046%Win rateLWLLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.0
Aggression7.7
Utility5.1
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning6.1
Utility5.1
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time576ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 24.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–3
131Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
711In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC24101442%0.01
dust2C2391439%0.00
mirageA2112957%-0.00
anubisC135838%-0.00
nukeA85363%0.02
trainC52340%0.01
inferno42250%0.06
cache1010%-0.04
overpass110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,208Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
72.7ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12551%0.9313.8
Ancient10452%1.0216.2
Anubis7943%0.9513.6
Dust27446%1.0614.8
Inferno5362%1.2415.1
Nuke4461%1.0515.6
Vertigo2948%0.9014.6
Overpass1173%0.9414.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
73.5%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
577msReaction time
30.6%T opening success
50.7%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
6.08HE damage / grenade
6.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.6401% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis1–13-0.045%25 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0627%25 Aug
dust26–13-0.0211%17 Aug
dust28–130.0233%17 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0419%17 Aug
dust213–100.0335%14 Aug
anubis16–13-0.016%14 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0739%8 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0223%8 Aug
ancient14–160.0137%7 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0440%30 Jul
anubis13–70.0424%28 Jul
ancient7–130.0011%26 Jul
dust27–13-0.0210%26 Jul
ancient13–110.0425%24 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0119%24 Jul
mirage13–60.0221%24 Jul
mirage13–70.0635%24 Jul
ancient6–130.023%23 Jul
inferno13–70.1127%23 Jul
anubis13–60.0712%23 Jul
mirage14–160.0633%23 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0320%16 Jul
anubis11–130.0417%16 Jul
mirage13–80.0726%16 Jul
dust23–130.0121%10 Jul
dust213–100.0941%10 Jul
dust26–13-0.0113%10 Jul
cache7–13-0.0426%7 Jul
mirage13–70.0015%7 Jul
dust211–13-0.0324%15 Jun
ancient10–13-0.027%14 May
ancient13–80.0525%14 May
inferno16–190.0225%2 May
overpass13–100.0220%8 Apr
nuke10–130.0713%7 Apr
ancient13–80.0223%7 Apr
dust27–13-0.0320%6 Apr
nuke15–15-0.0416%15 Nov
nuke13–70.0230%27 Sept
dust213–10.0614%27 Sept
mirage16–130.0325%16 Jul
train14–160.0133%10 Jun
dust215–15-0.0222%9 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0135%9 Jun
ancient13–80.0817%30 May
inferno13–10.1223%30 May
mirage16–13-0.0232%30 May
ancient13–6-0.0529%23 May
anubis9–13-0.0321%22 May
train14–16-0.0017%22 May
train11–13-0.0417%6 May
mirage5–13-0.038%28 Apr
ancient16–19-0.0016%24 Apr
nuke13–80.1328%25 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0442%25 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0325%24 Mar
ancient7–130.0632%24 Mar
ancient15–190.0124%23 Mar
mirage13–30.1421%23 Mar
dust24–13-0.0417%23 Mar
anubis6–130.0124%23 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0113%8 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0618%5 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0233%27 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0431%27 Feb
ancient0–13-0.0439%27 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0220%27 Feb
nuke16–14-0.0010%26 Feb
dust216–140.0037%26 Feb
dust213–70.0956%26 Feb
train13–100.0623%26 Feb
ancient13–60.0231%25 Feb
dust210–13-0.0226%25 Feb
dust23–13-0.0319%24 Feb
mirage13–60.0332%24 Feb
dust29–13-0.0026%24 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0623%22 Feb
anubis13–70.0336%22 Feb
dust213–80.0236%21 Feb
ancient8–130.0432%20 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0623%20 Feb
ancient9–130.0920%19 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0312%19 Feb
dust211–13-0.0322%18 Feb
dust219–170.0124%18 Feb
dust219–16-0.0214%6 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0814%6 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0247%30 Jan
anubis0–13-0.0329%30 Jan
ancient13–70.0526%29 Jan
dust211–130.0318%29 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0615%29 Jan
nuke13–4-0.0315%29 Jan
ancient13–110.0118%29 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0116%21 Jan
train13–90.0117%21 Jan
dust216–14-0.0138%21 Jan
nuke13–100.0221%11 Jan
anubis9–130.0214%11 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →