mld.

mld. — CS2 Stats

BR76561197964010152[U:1:3744424]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,846Tracked matches80%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,388 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,388 → 1,388
+30Tracked matches · now 1,846
+10.0ppWin rate · 70.0% → 80.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 13 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,522 +489 13 Apr3 May · 8 days played
24,74826,522peak 26,52213 Apr3 May
26,522Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,388Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2026-04-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,388
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 143 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmld.FACEITLevel 10 · 1,388 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO1,388csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning51
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58393Last 10058%Win rateWWWWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · −73ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 50 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 472ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 482ms

Last 20

  • 164 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility7.5
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 75 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.1
Utility7.5
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time529ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 529ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–9 · dust2, 8 Aug
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · inferno, 2 May
359msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 6 Sept
13–3Biggest win · ancient, 22 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W7Current streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2114767%0.01
nukeS2114767%-0.00
dust2B179853%0.00
cacheB168850%-0.00
infernoB115645%0.01
anubisS75271%-0.02
overpass31233%0.01
mirage31233%-0.00
vertigo110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

546Matches
55%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
78.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke6263%1.0315.4
Dust25845%0.9915.0
Inferno4661%1.0715.8
Anubis4269%1.2115.8
Ancient4154%1.0715.5
Cache4154%0.9213.8
Mirage2752%1.0014.4
Vertigo978%1.0315.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.0%Spray accuracy
82.6%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
522msReaction time
31.6%T opening success
49.8%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
11.2%Flash assists
9.53HE damage / grenade
15.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.5934% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–8-0.0029%15 Sept
anubis13–50.039%15 Sept
cache13–80.0020%14 Sept
nuke13–9-0.039%12 Sept
nuke13–80.0013%6 Sept
nuke13–90.0219%6 Sept
ancient13–50.059%6 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0222%6 Sept
cache3–13-0.063%4 Sept
nuke13–100.0817%3 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0614%3 Sept
cache13–8-0.0222%2 Sept
cache19–17-0.0311%1 Sept
nuke13–100.0626%20 Aug
dust29–13-0.099%20 Aug
cache6–13-0.0112%14 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0114%13 Aug
cache13–80.0621%12 Aug
cache13–11-0.038%12 Aug
ancient13–90.0126%11 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0026%11 Aug
dust213–80.0018%10 Aug
dust213–90.1011%8 Aug
cache10–13-0.0112%8 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0112%8 Aug
dust213–7-0.099%8 Aug
cache13–10-0.029%8 Aug
vertigo13–100.0519%7 Aug
dust213–10-0.0118%7 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0219%4 Aug
cache13–50.0116%1 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0115%27 Jul
cache16–140.0416%26 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0516%26 Jul
nuke16–140.0312%24 Jul
dust211–130.0120%23 Jul
cache6–13-0.0111%23 Jul
cache9–13-0.0215%22 Jul
ancient13–30.068%22 Jul
nuke14–16-0.1011%21 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0314%21 Jul
dust29–13-0.0315%21 Jul
dust213–30.0110%20 Jul
cache5–130.0114%20 Jul
nuke16–190.0316%20 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0321%20 Jul
ancient13–110.0719%19 Jul
nuke10–40.0317%19 Jul
inferno13–110.019%19 Jul
dust213–90.0431%19 Jul
cache9–130.0212%19 Jul
cache15–15-0.0115%17 Jul
ancient4–130.0115%17 Jul
overpass13–70.0712%25 Jun
ancient13–110.0414%9 Jun
ancient13–100.0823%5 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0616%29 May
ancient11–13-0.0412%29 May
ancient7–130.0126%26 May
ancient9–130.0525%12 May
mirage13–100.0517%8 May
anubis13–11-0.0612%3 May
inferno15–15-0.0213%3 May
inferno13–10-0.0338%2 May
nuke7–13-0.0314%2 May
ancient7–3-0.0510%2 May
inferno5–13-0.0119%2 May
dust25–13-0.0217%2 May
ancient16–13-0.0412%2 May
nuke16–13-0.028%1 May
nuke13–100.0217%1 May
nuke13–10-0.016%1 May
ancient6–130.0014%30 Apr
dust213–40.0529%30 Apr
dust24–13-0.0017%30 Apr
dust27–13-0.0314%30 Apr
dust211–130.0227%30 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0216%29 Apr
inferno8–130.0424%29 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0014%28 Apr
dust26–130.0111%28 Apr
nuke13–70.0122%28 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0221%28 Apr
ancient13–70.0122%27 Apr
ancient15–150.0117%27 Apr
dust213–100.0116%24 Apr
inferno7–130.0813%23 Apr
ancient16–130.0327%23 Apr
dust213–100.0528%23 Apr
anubis13–6-0.037%21 Apr
ancient13–50.0728%21 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0332%16 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0323%16 Apr
ancient16–13-0.058%16 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0317%16 Apr
overpass4–130.0126%14 Apr
anubis16–140.0320%14 Apr
inferno5–130.0511%13 Apr
ancient13–80.0219%13 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0412%13 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →