DaKillaH

DaKillaH — CS2 Stats

CO76561197963797388[U:1:3531660]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,753Tracked matches45%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating21,279Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#57740 of 220042 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,753 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 4 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,279 +651 4 Mar16 Sept · 31 days played
19,63923,266peak 23,2664 Mar16 Sept
23,606Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-03-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,987 below peak (23,266)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,721 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDaKillaHFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,279 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning42
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48493Last 10048%Win rateWLLLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · −111ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 644ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility6.4
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch3.6

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 628ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.2
Utility6.4
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time613ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 620ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy23.7%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–11 · inferno, 13 Mar
61%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · nuke, 26 Mar
406msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 8 Mar
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 28 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
1210In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 14overpassWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA23131057%-0.01
dust2A1911858%-0.03
infernoD1541127%-0.01
ancientA149564%-0.01
nukeA116555%-0.03
anubisC114736%-0.01
overpassD71614%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,582Matches
50%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
73.3ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage35250%0.9514.0
Anubis22653%1.0614.7
Ancient20548%0.9814.7
Dust214247%0.9414.1
Inferno13849%1.0013.8
Vertigo11059%1.0414.1
Nuke5145%0.9013.6
Overpass4547%0.8712.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.5%Headshot accuracy
30.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
628msReaction time
37.0%T opening success
27.2%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
8.91HE damage / grenade
14.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.024% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–7-0.0320%21 May
inferno7–13-0.0627%21 May
dust23–13-0.1016%21 May
dust29–13-0.0419%21 May
mirage8–13-0.0739%21 May
ancient2–13-0.0514%14 May
inferno13–50.0524%13 May
ancient13–90.000%29 Apr
ancient1–130.0244%29 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0733%29 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0027%27 Apr
mirage13–160.0015%23 Apr
overpass15–15-0.0713%21 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0120%21 Apr
dust28–13-0.0717%21 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0219%5 Apr
ancient16–13-0.0425%29 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0038%29 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0626%29 Mar
mirage16–12-0.0418%29 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0629%29 Mar
inferno13–80.0423%29 Mar
mirage11–130.0025%29 Mar
anubis8–13-0.046%29 Mar
nuke14–16-0.0415%28 Mar
mirage13–50.0231%28 Mar
mirage10–130.0432%28 Mar
dust213–60.0232%28 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0226%28 Mar
ancient13–9-0.054%28 Mar
dust213–10.0919%28 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0226%28 Mar
nuke6–130.0161%26 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0313%26 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0710%25 Mar
dust27–13-0.0820%25 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0417%25 Mar
ancient15–15-0.0318%25 Mar
anubis13–6-0.0110%25 Mar
dust210–13-0.0419%25 Mar
dust216–120.0215%24 Mar
nuke13–20.0521%24 Mar
ancient3–13-0.0411%23 Mar
dust213–11-0.0115%23 Mar
anubis13–30.0516%23 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0012%23 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0323%23 Mar
ancient13–50.0727%22 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0311%22 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0313%22 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0721%22 Mar
dust213–9-0.0321%22 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0119%22 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0317%22 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0331%22 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0717%21 Mar
dust213–5-0.016%21 Mar
overpass7–130.0619%20 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0321%20 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0331%20 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0227%20 Mar
dust213–11-0.0339%20 Mar
anubis10–130.0419%19 Mar
nuke9–13-0.068%19 Mar
inferno11–130.0333%19 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0514%19 Mar
overpass13–80.0417%19 Mar
dust211–130.0112%19 Mar
ancient7–13-0.078%17 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0326%17 Mar
mirage6–130.0325%17 Mar
ancient16–14-0.0218%17 Mar
overpass4–13-0.1233%16 Mar
dust210–13-0.0726%16 Mar
inferno13–80.0118%16 Mar
dust216–13-0.0315%16 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0510%16 Mar
inferno11–130.0417%14 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0716%14 Mar
inferno13–110.0922%13 Mar
overpass3–30.0021%12 Mar
overpass4–13-0.0424%12 Mar
dust216–14-0.0021%12 Mar
nuke13–80.0330%12 Mar
overpass10–130.0118%9 Mar
dust25–12-0.0521%9 Mar
nuke16–13-0.0419%9 Mar
mirage15–150.0219%9 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0620%8 Mar
dust213–6-0.114%8 Mar
ancient13–100.0141%8 Mar
ancient13–70.0731%8 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0310%8 Mar
mirage9–130.0228%8 Mar
dust213–40.0233%8 Mar
anubis13–60.0427%7 Mar
mirage13–90.0617%7 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0115%6 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0313%4 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0423%4 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →