+strafe

+strafe — CS2 Stats

IM76561197963567655[U:1:3301927]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,906Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,249Purple band · top ~11.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7225 of 14608 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 949 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG+strafeFACEITLevel 5 · 949 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER19,249 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning54
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49501Last 10049%Win rateLWLLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1
Aggression8.3
Utility4.5
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.4
Utility4.5
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time568ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — anubis 13–4
130Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
74In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 69% over 16anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC38152339%0.01
dust2B178947%-0.02
infernoS1611569%0.02
nukeC94544%-0.01
ancientB63350%0.01
cacheS64267%-0.01
anubisD62433%0.02
overpass220100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

86Matches
50%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
80.4ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2839%0.9716.0
Cache1377%1.3018.1
Anubis1242%0.9414.6
Dust21040%0.7511.2
Ancient956%0.9719.1
Inferno862%1.3320.8
Overpass3100%1.3117.3
Nuke10%0.5413.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
560msReaction time
32.4%T opening success
58.7%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
9.11HE damage / grenade
3.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.7828 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.4447% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–130.0626%18 Aug
dust213–90.0520%18 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0231%17 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0118%17 Aug
inferno12–160.0023%16 Aug
cache13–6-0.0238%16 Aug
mirage13–100.0419%16 Aug
dust213–8-0.0428%14 Aug
dust27–130.0131%14 Aug
anubis13–70.0017%14 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0112%14 Aug
mirage3–130.0621%13 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0224%13 Aug
dust213–10.0124%13 Aug
inferno7–130.0431%13 Aug
mirage5–130.0035%13 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0023%12 Aug
inferno13–100.0119%12 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0548%10 Aug
dust28–13-0.0419%30 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0110%25 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0017%23 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0412%22 Jul
cache4–13-0.0518%22 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0022%20 Jul
cache13–110.0016%20 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0515%15 Jul
inferno13–110.0724%5 Jul
mirage10–130.0125%3 Jul
dust25–13-0.0635%2 Jul
inferno13–70.0424%8 Jun
mirage8–130.0324%3 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0022%29 May
mirage14–160.0720%29 May
mirage8–13-0.0730%28 May
mirage19–220.0126%20 May
cache13–10-0.0118%20 May
nuke4–13-0.0120%19 May
dust27–13-0.0515%19 May
inferno13–16-0.0521%19 May
dust213–7-0.0135%19 May
dust27–13-0.1021%18 May
mirage9–130.0419%18 May
mirage13–50.0623%18 May
anubis16–19-0.0413%15 May
mirage13–100.0127%14 May
nuke5–13-0.0611%14 May
ancient13–70.0212%14 May
mirage13–60.0411%14 May
nuke12–16-0.0830%11 May
inferno13–5-0.0030%9 May
nuke13–80.0121%9 May
mirage13–70.1534%8 May
mirage10–13-0.0422%8 May
overpass13–40.0410%8 May
inferno13–20.1022%8 May
dust210–13-0.1021%8 May
cache10–130.0223%8 May
dust213–80.0331%8 May
mirage13–8-0.0228%8 May
anubis13–40.1714%5 May
mirage4–13-0.0425%5 May
inferno16–140.1027%4 May
anubis6–13-0.0211%4 May
cache13–60.0326%4 May
dust210–13-0.078%4 May
nuke10–130.0441%2 May
mirage2–00.010%2 May
dust213–7-0.0123%2 May
inferno13–60.0815%30 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0238%29 Apr
mirage13–80.0315%28 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0213%24 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0216%24 Apr
mirage13–70.0030%24 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0416%24 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0126%24 Apr
dust214–16-0.0321%24 Apr
dust213–70.0229%24 Apr
dust213–60.0520%24 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0225%24 Apr
mirage13–00.0213%23 Apr
nuke16–120.0033%23 Apr
ancient13–80.0433%23 Apr
dust211–13-0.0224%23 Apr
anubis10–130.0429%23 Apr
mirage7–130.0113%23 Apr
overpass13–90.058%22 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0122%22 Apr
nuke13–40.0421%22 Apr
inferno13–90.0018%22 Apr
mirage13–60.0110%22 Apr
mirage13–30.0027%22 Apr
mirage6–130.0028%21 Apr
inferno13–60.0216%21 Apr
mirage9–130.0025%21 Apr
mirage11–130.0336%21 Apr
ancient1–13-0.0426%21 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0131%21 Apr
mirage13–110.0318%20 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →