prodigious

prodigious — CS2 Stats

76561197963364528[U:1:3098800]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

6,326Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,956 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Share this profile

CSDB.GGprodigiousFACEITLevel 8 · 1,956 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning51
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5050Last 10050%Win rateWWWLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −10.2pp headshot accuracy · −71ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility6.6
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.2

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 70% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning5.1
Utility6.6
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time568ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–7 · anubis, 12 Jan
41%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · anubis, 3 Apr
367msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · ancient, 25 Jun
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 27 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 17mirageWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA22121055%-0.01
anubisC2191243%-0.01
infernoA2011955%-0.00
nukeS1712571%-0.01
mirageD92722%-0.03
dust2C73443%-0.03
vertigo1010%-0.02
cache1010%0.01
overpass1010%0.01
train110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

10,318Matches
50%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
73.0ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient83852%0.9114.4
Inferno66550%0.8414.0
Nuke60657%0.9014.2
Anubis50545%0.8614.3
Dust235549%0.8514.0
Vertigo32051%0.9215.0
Mirage27541%0.8814.7
Train8347%0.9014.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
74.7%Counter-strafing
12.2°Preaim
559msReaction time
30.4%T opening success
52.9%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
12.6%Flash assists
9.87HE damage / grenade
10.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.246° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–7-0.038%19 Sept
nuke13–90.039%10 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0225%6 Sept
anubis11–130.0215%6 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0321%3 Sept
inferno6–13-0.093%3 Sept
inferno13–100.0319%1 Sept
dust213–8-0.016%31 Aug
ancient13–8-0.079%31 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0315%31 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0327%25 Aug
inferno4–130.0017%22 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0122%16 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0218%16 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0123%15 Aug
anubis4–130.0216%11 Aug
nuke14–160.0322%6 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0217%5 Aug
vertigo6–13-0.0231%5 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0538%30 Jul
inferno13–80.0127%29 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0012%29 Jul
nuke13–80.0110%29 Jul
mirage3–13-0.073%29 Jul
anubis13–90.0314%25 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0618%25 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0917%24 Jul
nuke13–70.0012%24 Jul
inferno16–14-0.0417%24 Jul
inferno13–110.0515%23 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0315%23 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0013%23 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0111%23 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0314%23 Jul
mirage13–80.0516%16 Jul
dust28–13-0.0422%15 Jul
inferno5–13-0.026%15 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0224%14 Jul
ancient19–170.0524%13 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0210%13 Jul
dust213–9-0.038%8 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0115%5 Jul
ancient13–110.0624%4 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0029%3 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0211%3 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0211%25 Jun
mirage4–13-0.058%10 Jun
mirage13–160.0134%10 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0115%28 May
nuke12–16-0.1123%27 May
cache9–130.0113%30 Apr
ancient9–130.0329%20 Apr
anubis2–13-0.0615%19 Apr
ancient11–130.0211%19 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0110%4 Apr
inferno13–60.0216%4 Apr
anubis6–130.0041%3 Apr
nuke13–50.0111%2 Apr
ancient13–70.0331%29 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0916%20 Mar
anubis13–160.0022%19 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0530%17 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0320%16 Mar
anubis13–10-0.0219%16 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0217%13 Mar
anubis1–13-0.075%12 Mar
inferno13–80.0424%12 Mar
ancient16–13-0.0518%12 Mar
inferno16–14-0.0114%11 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0122%11 Mar
ancient16–140.0224%10 Mar
inferno8–130.0120%9 Mar
dust211–130.0124%3 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0020%27 Feb
anubis13–00.0430%27 Feb
inferno9–130.0122%25 Feb
dust29–13-0.0326%24 Feb
ancient13–80.0313%19 Feb
ancient13–50.0120%18 Feb
nuke16–130.0114%14 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0618%14 Feb
inferno13–160.064%13 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0716%13 Feb
nuke13–60.016%13 Feb
inferno10–130.0321%12 Feb
anubis5–13-0.0012%12 Feb
nuke13–10-0.0517%10 Feb
inferno16–190.0111%10 Feb
anubis5–13-0.0610%8 Feb
overpass10–130.0119%5 Feb
anubis5–13-0.0114%1 Feb
anubis14–16-0.0318%31 Jan
ancient31–29-0.0216%29 Jan
anubis13–110.0026%29 Jan
anubis13–60.0120%28 Jan
ancient13–30.0418%26 Jan
dust24–13-0.068%19 Jan
train13–11-0.0430%16 Jan
nuke10–13-0.0324%12 Jan
anubis13–70.0921%12 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →