Vamp

Vamp — CS2 Stats

76561197962388651[U:1:2122923]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,926Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,573Top 25% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#35779 of 252540 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,853 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (29 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,926 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,573 -63 26 Jul – 18 Sept · 17 days played
23,16224,334peak 24,33426 Jul18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,853 +0 2 Sept – 18 Sept · 3 observations
1,8531,853peak 1,8532 Sept18 Sept
24,334Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,853Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-07-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,853
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 148 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 761 below peak (24,334)
  • +374 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,427 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVampFACEITLevel 9 · 1,853 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,573 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,853csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning51
Utility78

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–50–4Last 10046%Win rateTLWLLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.4pp headshot accuracy · +48ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.3 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility7.8
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.4

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 78 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 550ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.1
Utility7.8
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time544ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 27 Jul →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 8–1 · mirage, 3 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 8–1 · mirage, 3 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 29 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
1–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9cacheWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2613–1350%0.01
dust2C259–1636%0.01
infernoB189–950%0.01
ancientB105–550%0.01
anubisS96–367%0.00
cacheD62–433%-0.00
nukeD62–433%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,801Matches
50%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
82.5ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage28053%1.2216.5
Inferno16054%1.2517.0
Dust215350%1.1815.8
Anubis12650%1.2116.1
Ancient12141%1.1515.6
Vertigo2552%1.0214.6
Nuke2348%1.0416.5
Overpass2255%1.0416.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.3%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
550msReaction time
40.0%T opening success
37.1%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
10.12HE damage / grenade
20.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.115% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust212–120.0523%12 Sept →
dust26–130.0617%12 Sept →
cache13–80.0631%7 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0110%3 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0321%1 Sept →
mirage13–90.0116%1 Sept →
nuke13–60.0922%29 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0211%29 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0321%29 Aug →
mirage13–90.1326%29 Aug →
dust210–130.0831%28 Aug →
mirage13–60.0619%28 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0312%28 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0311%28 Aug →
nuke13–10.1620%27 Aug →
dust213–100.0422%27 Aug →
nuke11–130.0615%26 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0432%25 Aug →
inferno8–130.0521%25 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0128%25 Aug →
mirage11–130.0017%22 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0822%22 Aug →
inferno13–40.0414%22 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0112%21 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0314%21 Aug →
dust213–50.0716%21 Aug →
cache13–60.0318%21 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0513%20 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0616%20 Aug →
mirage11–130.0616%20 Aug →
anubis13–30.089%19 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0035%19 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0116%18 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0526%18 Aug →
ancient13–80.0415%18 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0013%18 Aug →
dust213–40.1427%18 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0116%17 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0116%17 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0324%17 Aug →
inferno13–70.0413%17 Aug →
dust214–160.0516%15 Aug →
mirage13–40.1515%15 Aug →
mirage13–60.0525%14 Aug →
ancient10–130.0431%14 Aug →
nuke5–130.0519%14 Aug →
dust28–130.0119%13 Aug →
anubis13–30.0518%13 Aug →
ancient11–130.0029%12 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0334%12 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0615%12 Aug →
inferno0–7-0.078%12 Aug →
ancient13–60.0232%11 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0211%11 Aug →
anubis13–3-0.018%11 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0329%11 Aug →
inferno12–30.0423%11 Aug →
ancient13–60.0413%9 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0219%9 Aug →
dust27–130.0420%9 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0319%9 Aug →
mirage10–130.0623%8 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0313%8 Aug →
nuke13–160.0113%7 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0025%7 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0224%7 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0715%7 Aug →
mirage13–60.0315%7 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0416%6 Aug →
mirage10–130.0015%6 Aug →
inferno14–16-0.0112%6 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0710%6 Aug →
dust213–20.0218%5 Aug →
inferno13–50.0613%5 Aug →
inferno13–100.0218%4 Aug →
dust213–3-0.0813%4 Aug →
ancient13–80.0618%4 Aug →
mirage13–80.0122%3 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.019%3 Aug →
mirage8–1-0.0367%3 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0318%2 Aug →
anubis13–30.0033%2 Aug →
inferno13–70.0615%1 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.0127%1 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0229%1 Aug →
mirage13–50.0214%30 Jul →
inferno2–13-0.0610%30 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0215%30 Jul →
inferno16–130.0521%29 Jul →
anubis13–0-0.0146%29 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0115%29 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0311%28 Jul →
mirage16–120.0519%28 Jul →
inferno6–130.0317%28 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0017%27 Jul →
dust212–120.0420%27 Jul →
dust213–40.1828%27 Jul →
mirage15–15-0.0111%27 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0321%26 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0120%26 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.