NaLa^

NaLa^ — CS2 Stats

76561197962192616[U:1:1926888]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,080Tracked matches48%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating13,928Blue band · top ~34.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13666 of 20442 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,186 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

13,928Peak Premier on CSDB
1,186Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,186
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 15 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 13,928
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,072 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNaLa^FACEITLevel 5 · 1,186 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER13,928 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,186csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning46
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42535Last 10042%Win rateTLWWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.0
Aggression4.1
Utility6.9
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch0.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning4.6
Utility6.9
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time514ms−81ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 514ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — dust2 13–6
131Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
46In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 57% over 23mirageWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A23131057%-0.01
ancientD1741324%-0.01
infernoB137654%-0.02
cacheB115645%0.01
anubisA116555%0.01
nukeC104640%0.01
overpassD82625%-0.02
mirageD61517%-0.01
fachwerk1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

66Matches
50%Win rate
0.79Avg K/D
62.6ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

22%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21250%0.7411.8
Inferno1275%0.8812.1
Ancient1020%0.8011.3
Anubis633%0.8212.8
Mirage475%0.606.8
Nuke425%0.5912.5
Train2100%0.918.5
Overpass10%0.609.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.0%Spray accuracy
68.2%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
516msReaction time
24.0%T opening success
42.9%CT opening success
0.76Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
11.58HE damage / grenade
10.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.0423% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache15–150.0619%27 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0719%27 Aug
ancient13–80.0323%27 Aug
cache13–50.0225%25 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0618%25 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0012%25 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0120%24 Aug
dust213–80.0112%24 Aug
anubis13–70.0724%24 Aug
dust29–13-0.0131%23 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0117%23 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0517%23 Aug
fachwerk8–130.049%18 Aug
mirage6–130.0123%18 Aug
dust213–30.0515%17 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0413%17 Aug
dust213–4-0.0417%17 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0521%17 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0222%16 Aug
dust213–110.0017%16 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0310%16 Aug
cache7–130.019%14 Aug
anubis10–130.0223%14 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0230%13 Aug
dust213–50.0618%13 Aug
dust29–13-0.0916%10 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0226%10 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0416%18 Jul
anubis14–160.0122%16 Jul
dust216–14-0.0115%16 Jul
dust26–13-0.0717%16 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0414%16 Jul
dust216–120.0123%15 Jul
ancient7–130.036%15 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0235%14 Jul
cache13–30.0716%14 Jul
dust213–40.0219%13 Jul
anubis13–20.0016%13 Jul
cache11–130.0115%13 Jul
cache13–30.0517%10 Jul
cache13–70.0524%10 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0416%9 Jul
nuke7–130.0415%9 Jul
inferno13–10.0717%8 Jul
cache9–13-0.0416%8 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0715%5 Jul
ancient9–13-0.019%5 Jul
dust215–15-0.0218%2 Jul
anubis13–40.0025%2 Jul
overpass13–50.0615%2 Jul
ancient13–70.0522%1 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0219%1 Jul
overpass2–13-0.0626%1 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0019%1 Jul
overpass13–90.0311%29 Jun
dust213–6-0.0415%29 Jun
inferno13–60.0417%29 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0515%29 Jun
anubis10–13-0.048%29 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0217%26 Jun
anubis13–7-0.0315%26 Jun
dust213–60.0819%26 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0313%26 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0216%25 Jun
mirage3–130.0329%25 Jun
nuke15–15-0.0215%24 Jun
mirage13–100.0315%24 Jun
dust210–13-0.0225%24 Jun
cache13–9-0.0619%24 Jun
nuke13–50.0228%22 Jun
dust23–13-0.0220%22 Jun
nuke10–130.0420%21 Jun
overpass4–130.009%21 Jun
overpass15–15-0.0725%20 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0423%20 Jun
dust213–70.0021%17 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0114%17 Jun
dust210–13-0.0524%17 Jun
dust213–80.0631%15 Jun
inferno13–90.0110%15 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0812%6 Jun
cache5–13-0.0537%6 Jun
nuke16–14-0.019%4 Jun
ancient9–13-0.018%4 Jun
inferno9–130.0124%3 Jun
overpass11–13-0.057%2 Jun
ancient11–130.0114%2 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0115%1 Jun
dust27–13-0.0527%1 Jun
dust210–130.0222%31 May
anubis13–30.055%31 May
ancient13–16-0.0411%31 May
dust213–3-0.0118%30 May
ancient7–13-0.0821%30 May
nuke13–20.0616%30 May
overpass4–13-0.0115%30 May
anubis13–10.0627%29 May
cache8–130.0426%29 May
inferno9–13-0.0933%29 May
dust23–13-0.0344%28 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →