tRu-E-

tRu-E- — CS2 Stats

76561197962141391[U:1:1875663]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,421Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating17,733Purple band · top ~17.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,088 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,733 -4,441 5 Apr – 10 Oct · 15 days played
17,73322,934peak 22,9345 Apr10 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,088 +0 4 Sept – 5 Sept · 2 observations
2,0882,088peak 2,0884 Sept5 Sept
22,934Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,088Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
68Days played since 2026-04-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,088
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 412 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,201 below peak (22,934)
  • -4,705 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,267 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtRu-E-FACEITLevel 10 · 2,088 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER17,733 · Purple bandPEAK ELO2,088csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning55
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–55–1Last 10044%Win rateLWLLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +4.1pp headshot accuracy · +57ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 507ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.9
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.5
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time531ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 574ms → last ⅓ avg 531ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 10 Oct →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · dust2, 5 Jul →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · inferno, 26 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 7 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 50% over 18anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2512–1348%0.01
infernoB2512–1348%0.00
dust2B189–950%-0.01
anubisD93–633%-0.02
nukeC94–544%-0.01
ancientC83–538%-0.00
cache—31–233%0.03
overpass—30–30%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,490Matches
49%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
82.1ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno26952%1.0716.7
Mirage21448%1.0115.8
Anubis15947%1.0416.1
Ancient11851%1.0917.6
Dust210946%1.0415.4
Nuke7937%0.9915.7
Train3352%0.9816.6
Overpass1553%0.9014.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.7%Spray accuracy
81.1%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
525msReaction time
33.0%T opening success
48.2%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
8.89HE damage / grenade
6.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.0454% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.0329%11 Oct →
mirage13–40.1519%10 Oct →
ancient6–130.0321%8 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0213%6 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0525%29 Sept →
cache11–130.0113%27 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0017%8 Sept →
dust213–80.0324%7 Sept →
nuke13–90.0317%7 Sept →
anubis13–20.0217%7 Sept →
ancient13–40.0016%7 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0814%3 Sept →
inferno13–70.0222%30 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.1115%29 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.055%26 Aug →
cache11–130.0222%26 Aug →
nuke13–110.0617%24 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0111%18 Aug →
mirage13–20.0720%18 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0113%16 Aug →
anubis9–130.0114%16 Aug →
inferno13–110.0519%15 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0126%14 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0624%14 Aug →
cache16–120.0516%10 Aug →
mirage13–110.0117%9 Aug →
nuke13–80.0017%9 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0219%7 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0237%6 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0422%5 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0019%4 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.018%4 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0115%3 Aug →
dust213–90.0118%3 Aug →
dust213–80.0728%3 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0813%2 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0513%2 Aug →
mirage13–50.0416%2 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0916%2 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0313%2 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0324%1 Aug →
mirage11–130.048%31 Jul →
mirage6–10.1010%31 Jul →
inferno13–70.0121%31 Jul →
inferno13–100.0128%30 Jul →
mirage7–130.0120%26 Jul →
dust216–19-0.0517%20 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0624%15 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0213%14 Jul →
inferno17–190.0412%12 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0824%12 Jul →
mirage7–130.029%9 Jul →
inferno11–130.0624%9 Jul →
ancient13–80.0629%9 Jul →
inferno13–50.0223%7 Jul →
mirage13–100.0114%6 Jul →
dust213–70.0116%6 Jul →
dust21–13-0.0339%5 Jul →
mirage13–50.0710%4 Jul →
inferno13–90.0019%4 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0017%2 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0722%29 Jun →
nuke13–70.0518%25 Jun →
nuke2–13-0.1113%23 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0311%23 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0222%10 Jun →
nuke9–130.0017%6 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0528%2 Jun →
mirage4–130.0020%31 May →
anubis13–7-0.0223%31 May →
inferno13–7-0.0217%30 May →
mirage0–13-0.0724%30 May →
dust213–80.0628%29 May →
dust210–130.0326%25 May →
mirage13–11-0.0517%24 May →
mirage16–140.0218%24 May →
mirage8–13-0.0111%24 May →
inferno13–16-0.0611%22 May →
inferno13–16-0.028%21 May →
dust211–130.0017%21 May →
inferno15–150.0118%18 May →
inferno7–130.0113%13 May →
inferno13–80.0824%12 May →
mirage13–70.0610%10 May →
mirage17–190.0011%6 May →
inferno3–13-0.0713%3 May →
overpass8–13-0.0422%3 May →
anubis13–110.0223%28 Apr →
ancient3–13-0.0413%23 Apr →
mirage13–110.0714%20 Apr →
inferno13–70.0420%17 Apr →
ancient13–60.0422%15 Apr →
inferno13–60.1313%15 Apr →
overpass2–13-0.019%12 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0231%10 Apr →
dust213–100.0120%10 Apr →
overpass6–13-0.0812%10 Apr →
dust216–140.0326%9 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0221%8 Apr →
inferno1–13-0.0437%5 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.