n3lio

n3lio — CS2 Stats

JM76561197962017785[U:1:1752057]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,480Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,275Top 50% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#61334 of 238428 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,780 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 22 days played since 1 Sep 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,275 +3,940 1 Sept22 Sept · 22 days played
17,33522,197peak 22,1971 Sept22 Sept
22,797Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,780Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-09-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,780
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 221 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier CS Rating

  • 922 below peak (22,197)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,725 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGn3lioFACEITLevel 8 · 1,780 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,275 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,780csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning49
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55414Last 10055%Win rateLLWLLLWWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 521ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility7.2
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.9
Utility7.2
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time515ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 564ms → last ⅓ avg 515ms
Headshot accuracy15.2%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 12 Sept
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · dust2, 12 Sept
313msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · dust2, 14 Sept
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 19 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 42% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A37221559%0.00
mirageC1981142%-0.02
infernoB189950%-0.00
ancientB136746%0.00
nukeS65183%0.00
anubisA53260%0.02
cache220100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

627Matches
51%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
70.7ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6748%0.9413.3
Dust26458%0.9013.1
Anubis5052%0.9914.2
Inferno4672%1.0615.4
Ancient4551%0.9714.5
Nuke1553%0.8814.5
Vertigo1155%1.0416.0
Overpass757%0.9817.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.7%Spray accuracy
71.2%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
510msReaction time
29.2%T opening success
51.2%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
15.05HE damage / grenade
16.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.2197% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient5–13-0.0210%22 Sept
ancient7–130.0416%22 Sept
dust213–100.0615%22 Sept
anubis11–130.0522%22 Sept
dust27–13-0.0515%21 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0126%21 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0514%21 Sept
inferno8–20.0223%21 Sept
inferno15–150.0314%20 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0614%20 Sept
dust212–16-0.0513%20 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0316%20 Sept
dust213–80.1020%20 Sept
inferno13–70.0416%19 Sept
mirage13–1-0.0120%19 Sept
dust22–13-0.0814%19 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0219%19 Sept
inferno11–3-0.0010%19 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0912%19 Sept
dust213–9-0.0813%18 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0012%18 Sept
mirage13–7-0.016%18 Sept
nuke15–150.0012%18 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0423%17 Sept
anubis13–50.0213%17 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0522%17 Sept
nuke13–60.017%17 Sept
dust213–10-0.037%17 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0522%17 Sept
dust29–130.0517%17 Sept
cache16–14-0.0014%16 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0310%16 Sept
ancient13–40.0015%16 Sept
nuke13–40.0323%16 Sept
mirage16–13-0.016%16 Sept
dust216–120.0216%16 Sept
mirage9–130.0410%16 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0123%16 Sept
inferno9–130.0323%16 Sept
dust25–130.0226%15 Sept
dust214–16-0.029%15 Sept
mirage1–7-0.0429%15 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0510%15 Sept
dust213–6-0.0321%15 Sept
dust210–13-0.0113%15 Sept
inferno16–12-0.069%15 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0216%14 Sept
ancient13–60.0729%14 Sept
dust213–11-0.0417%14 Sept
ancient16–140.0122%14 Sept
ancient7–130.0320%14 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0222%13 Sept
dust213–90.0522%13 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0319%13 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0917%13 Sept
inferno7–130.0220%12 Sept
dust213–30.0717%12 Sept
mirage13–40.1218%12 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0115%12 Sept
dust213–11-0.0033%12 Sept
dust213–70.0020%11 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0014%11 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0113%11 Sept
dust213–10-0.0217%10 Sept
dust213–9-0.0119%9 Sept
dust213–100.0725%9 Sept
anubis13–80.0115%9 Sept
dust213–60.0822%9 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0524%9 Sept
mirage5–13-0.049%9 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0616%9 Sept
dust215–15-0.0110%8 Sept
anubis13–100.0215%8 Sept
dust211–13-0.0215%8 Sept
dust213–3-0.026%8 Sept
ancient13–100.049%8 Sept
cache13–10-0.0211%7 Sept
inferno13–110.0416%6 Sept
dust214–160.0319%6 Sept
inferno14–16-0.0116%6 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0523%5 Sept
dust28–13-0.105%5 Sept
dust213–90.0916%5 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0423%4 Sept
inferno13–50.0620%4 Sept
nuke13–50.0015%4 Sept
dust213–70.0329%3 Sept
dust213–110.0120%3 Sept
dust213–80.0118%3 Sept
mirage13–100.047%3 Sept
inferno13–30.0924%3 Sept
dust213–8-0.0227%2 Sept
dust213–70.0412%2 Sept
dust27–13-0.0018%2 Sept
dust27–130.0220%2 Sept
dust214–160.0124%2 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0114%1 Sept
dust24–13-0.075%1 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0110%1 Sept
mirage12–160.0522%1 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →