not tyler

not tyler — CS2 Stats

VN76561197961673539[U:1:1407811]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

250Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,585Top 10% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14533 of 220488 tracked
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 250 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 2 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,585 +4,080 2 Feb10 Sept · 28 days played
21,50525,585peak 25,5852 Feb10 Sept
25,585Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-02-02

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 25,585
  • +139 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,415 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnot tylerPREMIER25,585 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning74
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT67303Last 10067%Win rateWWWLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility7.1
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning7.4
Utility7.1
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.06+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.06
Reaction time579ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%−3.4%
first ⅓ avg 24.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.48Best match rating · 9–1 · poseidon, 23 May
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · dust2, 2 May
391msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · inferno, 6 Apr
13–1Biggest win · cache, 10 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 92% over 12overpassWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2117481%0.06
mirageC1981142%0.03
dust2S139469%0.05
cacheS1211192%0.06
infernoS118373%0.06
nukeD62433%0.04
overpassD51420%0.04
anubis43175%0.10
poseidon440100%0.20
vertigo220100%0.05
train21150%-0.01
sanctum110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
78.6%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
578msReaction time
36.5%T opening success
51.7%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
19.2%Flash assists
7.30HE damage / grenade
9.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.4917% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–90.1221%5 Jul
dust213–90.0814%5 Jun
inferno13–100.0025%5 Jun
mirage11–130.1028%4 Jun
dust213–80.1125%4 Jun
mirage13–60.1220%4 Jun
cache13–4-0.0035%4 Jun
ancient13–40.1421%1 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0516%31 May
cache13–40.0213%31 May
cache13–30.1020%31 May
mirage13–110.0624%31 May
ancient8–130.0919%30 May
ancient13–30.1929%30 May
dust213–90.0618%29 May
ancient13–50.0413%29 May
mirage11–130.0429%29 May
ancient13–20.0628%29 May
nuke10–130.0627%27 May
dust29–130.0419%27 May
mirage6–13-0.0411%26 May
ancient13–40.0514%26 May
ancient13–30.1214%26 May
ancient13–50.0511%25 May
ancient13–100.0915%25 May
ancient13–70.0725%25 May
ancient3–13-0.0621%24 May
mirage13–100.0116%24 May
inferno4–13-0.0118%24 May
ancient13–70.1021%24 May
ancient13–50.0233%24 May
ancient13–20.1323%24 May
dust213–110.0227%24 May
ancient16–130.0416%24 May
mirage7–13-0.0324%24 May
poseidon9–10.4831%23 May
cache13–90.0818%23 May
ancient13–90.0522%23 May
mirage5–13-0.0519%23 May
inferno13–90.1432%22 May
ancient13–90.0812%22 May
mirage13–50.0618%22 May
poseidon9–20.1934%21 May
poseidon9–30.0333%21 May
overpass4–90.0238%21 May
sanctum9–70.0417%21 May
poseidon9–40.1120%21 May
nuke8–80.0213%21 May
vertigo9–7-0.0125%21 May
inferno9–60.1528%21 May
vertigo13–70.1127%18 May
inferno10–100.0416%17 May
cache13–110.1524%17 May
mirage4–130.0416%17 May
train13–4-0.0224%12 May
nuke9–13-0.035%10 May
anubis13–50.1718%10 May
cache13–60.0314%10 May
cache11–130.0117%10 May
cache13–10.0731%10 May
cache13–70.1130%8 May
train12–12-0.0013%8 May
cache13–80.0619%8 May
dust213–70.1239%2 May
mirage11–13-0.0017%2 May
dust213–70.0427%29 Apr
cache13–20.1333%29 Apr
cache13–50.0218%29 Apr
overpass8–130.0225%6 Apr
inferno13–30.1025%6 Apr
mirage13–100.0721%2 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0023%2 Apr
anubis11–130.0522%31 Mar
dust213–110.0627%31 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0017%31 Mar
anubis13–70.0818%30 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0316%29 Mar
dust213–100.0525%29 Mar
nuke2–13-0.0435%29 Mar
mirage13–160.0636%29 Mar
nuke9–20.1829%27 Mar
inferno9–30.1030%27 Mar
nuke13–30.0725%25 Mar
inferno2–70.0626%25 Mar
dust212–120.0916%25 Mar
overpass11–130.0921%21 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0220%21 Mar
inferno13–60.0624%21 Mar
dust211–130.0328%12 Mar
dust213–70.0517%12 Mar
mirage13–90.0320%12 Mar
ancient10–130.0824%10 Mar
dust20–13-0.1225%10 Mar
mirage13–80.0333%6 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0234%15 Feb
inferno13–70.0425%15 Feb
overpass13–160.0427%3 Feb
ancient4–130.0219%3 Feb
mirage13–110.1028%3 Feb
overpass13–110.0424%2 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →