tuRkkz — CS2 Stats

76561197961660860[U:1:1395132]

2,738Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,021Top 25% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20334 of 252734 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (25 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,021 -557 6 Aug – 23 Sept · 16 days played
25,00027,161peak 27,1616 Aug23 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,174 +0 2 Sept – 16 Sept · 3 observations
2,1742,174peak 2,1742 Sept16 Sept
27,418Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,174Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-08-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,140 below peak (27,161)
  • -2,140 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,979 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtuRkkzFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,021 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,174csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning56
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52–47–1Last 10052%Win rateWLLLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.5pp headshot accuracy · +8ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility6.0
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.8° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.6
Utility6.0
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time578ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 25 Sept →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · dust2, 9 Aug →
328msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · dust2, 14 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 25 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
13–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 6cacheWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2412–1250%-0.01
dust2A1811–761%0.00
anubisC188–1044%-0.02
infernoB147–750%0.01
ancientA127–558%-0.01
cacheC83–538%0.01
nukeS64–267%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,428Matches
51%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
77.2ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage22252%0.9214.4
Anubis11347%0.9714.5
Inferno11052%1.0315.6
Ancient10250%0.9814.9
Dust26448%1.0115.2
Vertigo5360%1.0115.9
Nuke4149%1.0515.1
Overpass1942%0.9215.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
86.6%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
569msReaction time
37.3%T opening success
46.0%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
9.59HE damage / grenade
7.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.2987% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–110.0119%28 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0122%27 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0019%27 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0214%26 Sept →
inferno8–130.0617%26 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0521%25 Sept →
dust213–20.1116%25 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0212%23 Sept →
mirage6–130.0020%23 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0319%23 Sept →
dust213–80.0122%21 Sept →
dust213–60.0317%20 Sept →
inferno13–50.0739%20 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.1011%20 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0318%18 Sept →
inferno10–130.0226%17 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0114%17 Sept →
nuke1–80.0131%17 Sept →
anubis0–13-0.1014%17 Sept →
inferno13–90.0922%16 Sept →
mirage13–60.0313%12 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0719%12 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0116%12 Sept →
anubis13–100.0017%10 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0827%10 Sept →
mirage13–110.1026%8 Sept →
mirage13–100.0225%7 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0619%7 Sept →
anubis8–130.0233%6 Sept →
inferno13–60.0323%6 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0329%6 Sept →
ancient13–90.0622%5 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0625%5 Sept →
inferno13–50.0622%5 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0229%5 Sept →
nuke13–20.0821%5 Sept →
dust213–50.0011%5 Sept →
ancient13–50.0516%2 Sept →
mirage13–30.0623%2 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0120%31 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0221%31 Aug →
ancient6–130.0436%30 Aug →
dust28–130.0123%30 Aug →
anubis13–90.0127%30 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0125%29 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0018%29 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0321%28 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0222%27 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0515%26 Aug →
anubis13–60.0120%26 Aug →
dust213–50.0215%25 Aug →
anubis13–110.0417%25 Aug →
anubis13–40.0014%25 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0323%24 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0517%23 Aug →
dust216–130.0123%23 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0729%22 Aug →
mirage16–12-0.0013%21 Aug →
ancient16–140.0130%19 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0721%17 Aug →
mirage13–110.0420%15 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0415%15 Aug →
mirage0–13-0.099%15 Aug →
cache13–110.0922%15 Aug →
cache13–110.0615%14 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.0315%14 Aug →
cache13–60.028%14 Aug →
dust20–13-0.0610%14 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0820%14 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0317%14 Aug →
dust213–70.0315%14 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0715%13 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0521%12 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0419%12 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0132%12 Aug →
ancient13–100.0314%12 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0520%11 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0315%11 Aug →
dust213–70.0333%11 Aug →
nuke13–80.0413%11 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0117%11 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0138%11 Aug →
mirage13–30.0314%11 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0125%10 Aug →
nuke13–40.0522%10 Aug →
mirage6–130.0122%9 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0612%9 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0017%9 Aug →
dust213–100.0141%9 Aug →
nuke13–110.0821%9 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0311%9 Aug →
anubis9–130.0117%9 Aug →
mirage13–110.0233%8 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0227%8 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0319%8 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0214%7 Aug →
ancient13–110.0216%7 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0215%7 Aug →
dust211–130.0122%7 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0217%6 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.