mawth — CS2 Stats

PROVasco EsportsBrazilRiflerSettings & gear profile →

76561197961339879[U:1:1074151]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,472Tracked matches79%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating8.3 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating30,842Top 1% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersGold band · top ~0.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#8 of 5268 tracked

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

30,842Peak Premier on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 30,842
Reached: Gold band · Red band · Pink band · Purple band
Gold band first seen 2026-08-28
Red band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91

Positioning65

Utility81

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT67–31–2Last 10067%Win rateWLLWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.1

Aggression10.0

Utility8.1

Positioning6.5

Opening Duels5.1

Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Utility. Utility score of 81 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1

Positioning6.5

Utility8.1

Mechanics7.7

Opening Duels5.1

Win Impact10.0

Composite 8.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.05

Reaction time508ms−27ms

first ⅓ avg 535ms → last ⅓ avg 508ms

Headshot accuracy29.5%+6.5%

first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 29.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.27Best rating — dust2 13–2

13–0Biggest win — nuke

10Longest win streak

7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 100% over 10infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	24	14–10	58%	0.06
anubis	A	18	11–7	61%	0.03
mirage	S	15	11–4	73%	0.08
cache	S	12	8–4	67%	0.04
nuke	S	10	10–0	100%	0.07
ancient	S	9	7–2	78%	0.08
inferno	D	7	2–5	29%	0.00
overpass	S	5	4–1	80%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,277Matches

61%Win rate

1.56Avg K/D

90.0ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

30%1v2 clutch win

18Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	328	55%	1.54	19.1
Dust2	168	63%	1.65	19.2
Ancient	131	65%	1.70	17.5
Anubis	126	60%	1.65	19.1
Inferno	65	68%	1.58	18.1
Nuke	53	66%	1.69	20.3
Cache	34	85%	1.65	18.0
Vertigo	33	79%	1.86	19.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$1,531Inventory value18ItemsFull inventory breakdown →

$868

$298

$178

$89

$55

$19

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.8%Headshot accuracy

37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.9%Spray accuracy

84.5%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

522msReaction time

54.2%T opening success

46.7%CT opening success

0.72Enemies flashed / flash

11.6%Flash assists

10.66HE damage / grenade

13.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–3	0.01	27%	26 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.00	20%	24 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	32%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.00	17%	24 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.00	33%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.13	26%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.14	30%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.13	28%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.07	35%	18 Aug →
anubis	7–0	0.02	55%	18 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.07	31%	18 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.02	33%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.09	21%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.06	16%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.04	25%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.09	24%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.14	30%	14 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.00	23%	13 Aug →
anubis	2–13	0.00	57%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.27	30%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.08	23%	12 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.05	30%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.11	33%	12 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.03	29%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.04	33%	12 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.17	20%	11 Aug →
anubis	5–0	-0.05	29%	11 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	22%	11 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.00	26%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.05	23%	11 Aug →
cache	2–13	0.00	14%	11 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.05	67%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.19	31%	7 Aug →
dust2	2–0	0.07	40%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.04	24%	7 Aug →
mirage	16–19	0.11	24%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.02	29%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–4	-0.02	14%	4 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.09	25%	4 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.12	27%	4 Aug →
anubis	14–16	0.01	16%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.21	21%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.00	25%	29 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.10	21%	29 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.02	27%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.11	22%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.03	20%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.07	28%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.06	30%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.03	11%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.17	27%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.10	23%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.09	27%	21 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.08	50%	20 Jul →
ancient	0–13	-0.01	0%	20 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.10	22%	19 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.05	75%	18 Jul →
anubis	14–16	0.02	18%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.09	27%	15 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.01	25%	15 Jul →
anubis	0–2	-0.05	50%	12 Jul →
dust2	3–13	0.03	37%	12 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.04	13%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.02	22%	12 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.04	16%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.18	34%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.19	31%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–0	0.11	21%	9 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.01	23%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.11	29%	9 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	19%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.07	24%	4 Jul →
inferno	14–16	0.10	28%	3 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.05	11%	2 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.02	18%	2 Jul →
dust2	19–15	0.04	22%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.06	16%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.02	32%	1 Jul →
overpass	13–3	0.07	25%	30 Jun →
nuke	13–5	0.05	23%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–2	0.11	29%	28 Jun →
mirage	16–14	0.11	22%	26 Jun →
overpass	13–1	0.05	11%	26 Jun →
ancient	11–13	0.08	24%	26 Jun →
anubis	16–14	0.03	33%	25 Jun →
nuke	13–7	0.02	17%	23 Jun →
cache	11–13	0.03	16%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.09	36%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.04	30%	23 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.02	17%	22 Jun →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	15%	22 Jun →
anubis	13–7	0.04	15%	18 Jun →
overpass	13–8	0.02	31%	18 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.07	25%	17 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.07	19%	17 Jun →
overpass	3–13	-0.04	28%	17 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.07	27%	16 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.01	26%	16 Jun →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	26%	16 Jun →
overpass	13–3	0.09	23%	15 Jun →