vargur

vargur — CS2 Stats

IS76561197961068560[U:1:802832]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

8,301Tracked matches40%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating27,724Top 5% of 205,709 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3161 of 253079 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,547 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Oct 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 27,724 → 27,724
0Faceit ELO · 3,547 → 3,547
+58Tracked matches · now 8,301
−3.3ppWin rate · 43.3% → 40.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,724 +1,025 2 Apr – 2 Oct · 14 days played
26,69927,891peak 27,8912 Apr2 Oct
Faceit ELO: 3,547 +0 29 Aug – 2 Oct · 7 observations
3,5473,547peak 3,54729 Aug2 Oct
27,891Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,547Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
64Days played since 2026-01-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,547
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 — 453 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 167 below peak (27,891)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,276 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGvargurFACEITLevel 10 · 3,547 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER27,724 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO3,547csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning50
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–50Last 10050%Win rateLLWLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · +32ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 483ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility7.3
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch4.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.0
Utility7.3
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time511ms−92ms
first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 511ms
Headshot accuracy21.8%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–5 · mirage, 7 Feb →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · ancient, 16 Mar →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · inferno, 14 Jun →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 5 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 72% over 18ancientWeakest map · 19% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientD214–1719%-0.02
anubisA1912–763%0.02
dust2S1813–572%0.02
nukeB168–850%0.01
mirageA95–456%-0.01
infernoC83–538%-0.01
poseidon—32–167%0.11
cache—20–20%-0.05
overpass—21–150%0.01
train—11–0100%0.04
vertigo—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (19% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

8,520Matches
52%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
78.9ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis134956%1.1016.3
Ancient114549%1.0415.5
Dust2110550%1.0114.6
Nuke88159%1.2016.3
Inferno24451%1.0415.0
Train20649%1.0816.3
Overpass14543%1.0315.6
Mirage12536%0.9814.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
77.6%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
512msReaction time
31.1%T opening success
52.8%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
6.59HE damage / grenade
19.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.1207% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

19% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient3–13-0.104%11 Oct →
ancient11–130.0126%10 Oct →
nuke13–50.0422%29 Sept →
cache18–22-0.0420%27 Sept →
nuke13–50.0323%21 Sept →
dust210–130.0428%13 Sept →
anubis13–80.0335%12 Sept →
dust26–130.0434%12 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0627%12 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0420%1 Sept →
dust213–100.0119%29 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0122%26 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0028%26 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0521%26 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.087%26 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0527%23 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0521%19 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0333%19 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0317%19 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0427%6 Aug →
anubis13–70.0522%4 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0318%4 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0325%4 Aug →
nuke11–130.0114%27 Jul →
anubis13–70.0227%22 Jul →
dust222–200.0827%20 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0427%12 Jul →
ancient16–120.0014%12 Jul →
anubis13–50.0016%8 Jul →
anubis3–130.0326%3 Jul →
dust20–13-0.1211%30 Jun →
dust213–8-0.0116%26 Jun →
inferno3–13-0.0317%25 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0819%25 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0213%22 Jun →
overpass8–13-0.0223%18 Jun →
anubis13–6-0.0417%18 Jun →
inferno13–50.0116%14 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0619%14 Jun →
anubis10–130.0116%13 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0337%10 Jun →
nuke8–130.0619%10 Jun →
nuke6–130.0131%2 Jun →
inferno4–13-0.1021%28 May →
ancient6–13-0.0414%27 May →
ancient9–130.0237%27 May →
nuke8–130.0625%2 May →
mirage13–4-0.0238%12 Apr →
inferno9–130.0320%12 Apr →
dust213–70.0618%11 Apr →
dust213–50.0925%11 Apr →
anubis13–90.1434%10 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0117%10 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0529%9 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0429%9 Apr →
dust213–70.0632%6 Apr →
overpass13–50.0426%6 Apr →
dust27–130.0135%6 Apr →
nuke13–50.1215%5 Apr →
anubis13–20.1531%5 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0519%5 Apr →
dust213–8-0.0121%5 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.0123%2 Apr →
dust213–40.1429%2 Apr →
mirage13–6-0.0030%29 Mar →
mirage13–9-0.0832%28 Mar →
anubis13–30.1220%27 Mar →
mirage8–30.0321%27 Mar →
ancient3–13-0.0929%27 Mar →
dust213–5-0.0134%27 Mar →
inferno13–60.0714%24 Mar →
inferno13–90.0222%24 Mar →
anubis10–13-0.0612%20 Mar →
nuke13–11-0.020%19 Mar →
ancient13–40.0041%16 Mar →
dust213–80.0217%16 Mar →
dust213–100.0224%15 Mar →
train13–80.0419%14 Mar →
dust213–80.0123%12 Mar →
ancient11–13-0.0413%12 Mar →
anubis8–13-0.0025%11 Mar →
anubis13–7-0.0319%10 Mar →
ancient9–13-0.0217%4 Mar →
ancient14–16-0.0330%3 Mar →
anubis13–80.0229%2 Mar →
nuke13–30.0925%2 Mar →
dust213–80.0216%27 Feb →
ancient9–13-0.0015%26 Feb →
nuke2–13-0.0524%19 Feb →
ancient13–50.0620%12 Feb →
vertigo9–50.0139%7 Feb →
poseidon9–20.1640%7 Feb →
mirage13–50.1717%7 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.0219%6 Feb →
anubis11–130.0127%2 Feb →
nuke13–10-0.0629%2 Feb →
nuke13–7-0.0213%1 Feb →
ancient7–130.1019%31 Jan →
poseidon3–90.0422%24 Jan →
poseidon9–70.1415%24 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.