JIN64

JIN64 — CS2 Stats

76561197960830083[U:1:564355]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

946Tracked matches55%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,140Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating27,306Top 5% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4283 of 224748 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,160 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 946 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 21 days played since 12 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,306 +2,429 12 Aug17 Sept · 23 days played
24,87727,759peak 27,75912 Aug17 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,160 +0 28 Aug17 Sept · 5 observations
1,1601,160peak 1,16028 Aug17 Sept
27,759Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,160Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
21Days played since 2026-08-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,160
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 41 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 453 below peak (27,759)
  • +657 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 2,694 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,115), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate56.9%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy2.5%13.0%13.2%10.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.141.061.07above
Match win rate37.6%46.3%46.9%9.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJIN64FACEITLevel 8 · 1,160 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER27,306 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,160csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning50
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53452Last 10053%Win rateWLWWWTLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.7pp headshot accuracy · −60ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 10

  • 721 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.0
Utility6.6
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time618ms+59ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 618ms
Headshot accuracy25.2%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 25.5% → last ⅓ avg 25.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–8 · mirage, 30 Aug
59%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · inferno, 25 Aug
391msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 25 Aug
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 1 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 20ancientWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C23101343%0.00
anubisB2091145%-0.00
nukeS2015575%0.01
infernoB126650%-0.00
ancientC125742%0.00
cacheA106460%-0.02
mirage32167%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,750Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
1,688Matches
37.6%Match win rate
56.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
2.5%Shot accuracy
3,364MVPs
812Hours (in match)
1,009Bombs planted
399Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,732dust2
1,880inferno
1,547nuke
203vertigo
167train
22office
4dust
1italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

82Matches
60%Win rate
1.30Avg K/D
88.3ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22065%1.3316.6
Ancient1450%1.0916.2
Inferno1385%1.4720.1
Anubis1145%1.2618.1
Cache1060%1.3516.3
Nuke956%1.2418.4
Mirage425%1.3018.5
Train1100%1.7816.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.2%Headshot accuracy
39.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.5%Spray accuracy
88.2%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
621msReaction time
42.4%T opening success
34.0%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
2.2%Flash assists
10.90HE damage / grenade
14.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 34.0304% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–10-0.0313%17 Sept
nuke5–130.0918%6 Sept
inferno13–100.1128%6 Sept
anubis13–2-0.0416%1 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0526%1 Sept
ancient15–15-0.0429%1 Sept
cache9–13-0.0417%1 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0429%1 Sept
nuke13–90.0914%31 Aug
dust213–6-0.0129%31 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0417%31 Aug
mirage13–80.1129%30 Aug
dust21–13-0.0223%30 Aug
dust211–130.0522%30 Aug
dust27–130.0430%30 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0417%29 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0043%29 Aug
cache16–14-0.0513%29 Aug
anubis13–80.0727%29 Aug
dust25–130.0232%29 Aug
cache13–60.0336%26 Aug
inferno13–90.0119%26 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0125%26 Aug
anubis12–160.0117%25 Aug
inferno13–110.0225%25 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0617%25 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0459%25 Aug
dust211–130.0216%25 Aug
dust213–11-0.0220%24 Aug
anubis11–130.0327%24 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0318%24 Aug
ancient9–130.0136%23 Aug
mirage13–40.0945%23 Aug
anubis11–130.0129%23 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0229%23 Aug
dust22–13-0.0629%23 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0523%23 Aug
dust213–60.0232%23 Aug
dust213–11-0.0528%22 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0314%22 Aug
dust213–5-0.0315%22 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0222%22 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0322%21 Aug
nuke13–100.0220%21 Aug
dust28–130.0215%21 Aug
cache6–130.0018%21 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0413%21 Aug
ancient11–130.0014%21 Aug
nuke13–70.0415%20 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0023%20 Aug
ancient13–100.0524%20 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0431%20 Aug
dust210–130.0130%20 Aug
nuke13–40.0230%19 Aug
cache13–70.0328%19 Aug
ancient13–70.0328%19 Aug
cache13–9-0.0037%19 Aug
anubis11–130.0123%18 Aug
ancient7–130.0127%18 Aug
dust26–13-0.0323%18 Aug
nuke13–100.0425%18 Aug
ancient9–130.0331%18 Aug
ancient13–30.0417%18 Aug
nuke11–130.0524%17 Aug
cache1–13-0.1456%17 Aug
nuke13–30.0339%16 Aug
anubis13–30.109%16 Aug
dust28–1-0.0223%16 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0522%16 Aug
dust213–9-0.0126%16 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0214%16 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0422%16 Aug
cache6–13-0.0635%16 Aug
inferno13–40.0527%16 Aug
anubis13–160.0137%16 Aug
inferno13–2-0.0424%16 Aug
nuke13–80.0319%16 Aug
anubis13–80.0920%16 Aug
nuke9–130.0320%16 Aug
dust213–11-0.0721%16 Aug
cache13–40.0329%16 Aug
ancient13–90.0333%16 Aug
dust213–8-0.0026%15 Aug
nuke9–2-0.0538%15 Aug
dust210–130.0515%15 Aug
cache13–100.0138%15 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0132%15 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0123%15 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0123%14 Aug
nuke13–60.0621%14 Aug
dust24–13-0.0225%14 Aug
dust26–130.0831%13 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0944%13 Aug
anubis13–90.0120%13 Aug
nuke13–100.0733%13 Aug
dust213–50.0229%13 Aug
inferno13–50.0320%13 Aug
anubis10–13-0.1017%12 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0216%12 Aug
dust29–130.0319%12 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →