viHa

viHa — CS2 Stats

76561197960793838[U:1:528110]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,460Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,925Top 50% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#68040 of 251264 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,631 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+30Premier CS Rating · 20,895 → 20,925

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,925 -2,194 29 Aug – 11 Oct · 16 days played
20,89523,809peak 23,80929 Aug11 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,631 +0 29 Aug – 20 Sept · 6 observations
1,6311,631peak 1,63129 Aug20 Sept
24,087Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,631Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,631
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 120 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,884 below peak (23,809)
  • -2,438 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,075 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGviHaFACEITLevel 9 · 1,631 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER20,925 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,631csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning72
Utility79

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateWLLLWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · −26ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility7.9
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels5.8
Clutch4.4

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 71% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Utility. Utility score of 79 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning7.2
Utility7.9
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels8.3
Win Impact1.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time533ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 539ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–0 · cache, 20 Sept →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · cache, 23 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · ancient, 13 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 20 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 8mirageWeakest map · 0% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2414–1058%0.01
ancientB2110–1148%0.00
cacheC176–1135%-0.01
infernoS1611–569%0.03
dust2S86–275%0.01
mirageD70–70%-0.01
anubisS75–271%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 7). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

705Matches
52%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
83.2ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke11756%1.0516.2
Inferno9558%1.1116.8
Dust27749%0.9915.7
Ancient6655%1.0715.6
Anubis4764%1.1716.9
Cache3543%0.9814.3
Mirage3228%0.9414.8
Overpass1850%1.1017.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.0%Spray accuracy
76.7%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
545msReaction time
70.5%T opening success
56.5%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
10.4%Flash assists
10.86HE damage / grenade
16.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–50.0618%11 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0018%11 Oct →
mirage11–130.0724%10 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.059%10 Oct →
nuke13–50.0917%10 Oct →
anubis13–90.0213%10 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0720%10 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0619%10 Oct →
inferno13–100.0221%10 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0420%10 Oct →
nuke16–130.0514%9 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0124%9 Oct →
mirage5–130.0122%9 Oct →
ancient7–130.0217%9 Oct →
nuke13–60.0212%8 Oct →
inferno13–90.0219%8 Oct →
ancient13–70.0319%4 Oct →
nuke9–130.0411%4 Oct →
nuke13–30.0228%4 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0210%1 Oct →
nuke15–150.0614%1 Oct →
nuke13–30.1320%1 Oct →
mirage0–2-0.110%1 Oct →
mirage5–130.0221%1 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0121%1 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0031%1 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.085%30 Sept →
mirage11–130.0110%24 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.037%23 Sept →
inferno10–130.0525%23 Sept →
dust215–150.0118%23 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0338%23 Sept →
ancient16–190.0010%22 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.1110%22 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0410%20 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.068%20 Sept →
dust213–90.014%20 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0116%20 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0315%20 Sept →
cache13–00.1520%20 Sept →
nuke13–80.1115%20 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0318%20 Sept →
anubis13–60.0115%17 Sept →
cache16–140.0015%17 Sept →
cache13–100.0220%16 Sept →
inferno9–130.0220%15 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0113%15 Sept →
cache10–13-0.069%15 Sept →
dust213–20.0016%13 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0429%13 Sept →
ancient13–70.0318%13 Sept →
ancient13–10.0621%13 Sept →
cache4–13-0.013%13 Sept →
cache13–160.029%12 Sept →
inferno13–60.0016%12 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0125%12 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0717%11 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0520%11 Sept →
dust28–130.0015%11 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0031%10 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0821%10 Sept →
ancient13–110.0813%10 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0120%9 Sept →
inferno13–100.0112%9 Sept →
nuke13–80.0515%9 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.043%9 Sept →
dust213–90.047%9 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0613%9 Sept →
dust213–110.0123%8 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0614%8 Sept →
ancient16–130.0325%8 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0418%7 Sept →
nuke13–40.0510%7 Sept →
inferno13–50.0814%6 Sept →
cache13–50.0218%6 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0410%6 Sept →
ancient13–110.0817%6 Sept →
nuke13–70.0220%6 Sept →
inferno13–100.0912%6 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0015%6 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0613%6 Sept →
inferno13–70.0430%6 Sept →
ancient13–100.0217%6 Sept →
anubis13–30.0824%6 Sept →
ancient11–130.0514%5 Sept →
cache13–90.0410%5 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0124%5 Sept →
nuke11–130.0213%5 Sept →
inferno13–50.0517%5 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0116%5 Sept →
anubis16–140.0215%5 Sept →
inferno13–50.0214%5 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0113%4 Sept →
inferno13–10.1017%4 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0213%4 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0613%4 Sept →
nuke12–16-0.0314%3 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0022%3 Sept →
ancient13–70.009%3 Sept →
ancient8–130.0612%2 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.