1van^[450] — CS2 Stats

76561197960624577[U:1:358849]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,640Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.3 Developing

Premier CS Rating21,218Pink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#5749 of 15209 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,669 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51

Positioning47

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40–57–3Last 10040%Win rateWLLLWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.1

Aggression4.7

Utility6.0

Positioning4.7

Opening Duels0.6

Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 60% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1

Positioning4.7

Utility6.0

Mechanics2.2

Opening Duels1.6

Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time546ms−10ms

first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms

Headshot accuracy19.5%+1.2%

first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — inferno 9–2

13–0Biggest win — dust2

5Longest win streak

8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 53% over 15dust2Weakest map · 29% over 28

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	D	28	8–20	29%	-0.02
mirage	C	24	10–14	42%	-0.02
inferno	B	15	8–7	53%	-0.02
cache	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.03
anubis	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.01
ancient	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.04
nuke	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 28). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

861Matches

50%Win rate

0.98Avg K/D

67.8ADR

35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

16%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	262	52%	1.00	14.5
Dust2	162	50%	0.95	13.8
Anubis	93	46%	0.99	13.7
Inferno	93	57%	0.94	13.5
Ancient	47	49%	1.08	14.3
Cache	38	50%	0.87	12.0
Overpass	31	39%	0.89	12.7
Vertigo	26	46%	1.01	15.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy

29.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.5%Spray accuracy

59.9%Counter-strafing

8.9°Preaim

541msReaction time

22.0%T opening success

43.0%CT opening success

0.59Enemies flashed / flash

6.5%Flash assists

12.66HE damage / grenade

8.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 22.0149% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–11	0.04	22%	28 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.05	28%	26 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.09	21%	26 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	20%	24 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.02	10%	23 Aug →
dust2	17–19	-0.01	16%	22 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	10%	22 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.05	21%	20 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.04	30%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.05	25%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.03	28%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	34%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.09	9%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–2	-0.00	18%	16 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	25%	15 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.08	13%	11 Aug →
mirage	11–2	0.03	9%	11 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	40%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	13%	10 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	9%	5 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.07	17%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.05	30%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.01	17%	4 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.02	29%	4 Aug →
mirage	1–13	0.01	16%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.01	10%	3 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	18%	3 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.05	21%	2 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.03	12%	2 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.02	15%	2 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.02	21%	2 Aug →
inferno	9–2	0.23	20%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–2	-0.01	16%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.01	24%	30 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.12	14%	30 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.02	23%	29 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	15%	27 Jul →
cache	13–3	-0.01	32%	27 Jul →
cache	14–16	-0.01	15%	27 Jul →
inferno	4–9	-0.13	21%	24 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.09	25%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.00	17%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.05	20%	22 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.09	0%	22 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	23%	22 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.12	0%	20 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	8%	17 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.06	8%	17 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	9%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.00	0%	17 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	12%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.07	17%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	17%	11 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	17%	10 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.08	13%	10 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	21%	10 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	13%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	14%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.00	20%	9 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	20%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.02	5%	6 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.06	10%	5 Jul →
inferno	13–6	-0.01	12%	5 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	17%	5 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	29%	5 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.08	7%	3 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.10	7%	26 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	13%	24 Jun →
anubis	13–8	0.06	23%	24 Jun →
mirage	16–13	-0.01	15%	24 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.01	18%	22 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	19%	22 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	12%	21 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.08	21%	21 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	24%	21 Jun →
inferno	13–6	0.02	27%	21 Jun →
inferno	14–16	-0.03	21%	19 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	16%	18 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	30%	18 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.09	29%	17 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	18%	16 Jun →
inferno	16–13	-0.01	11%	16 Jun →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	15%	15 Jun →
inferno	11–13	-0.05	7%	15 Jun →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	12%	15 Jun →
anubis	13–7	-0.02	21%	15 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	30%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.01	22%	14 Jun →
overpass	13–9	-0.01	6%	13 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	13%	13 Jun →
anubis	13–9	-0.00	19%	12 Jun →
overpass	13–8	0.10	16%	11 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.05	17%	10 Jun →
dust2	13–16	-0.00	19%	9 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	24%	9 Jun →
inferno	7–13	-0.07	14%	9 Jun →
ancient	15–15	-0.00	19%	8 Jun →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	32%	8 Jun →
anubis	11–13	-0.05	14%	7 Jun →
cache	2–13	-0.09	9%	7 Jun →