AimhoT

AimhoT — CS2 Stats

76561197960353379[U:1:87651]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,937Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,199 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (40 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,199 → 1,199
+1Tracked matches · now 1,937
0.0ppWin rate · 53.3% → 53.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,541 +662 8 Mar – 23 May · 27 days played
15,92318,547peak 18,5478 Mar23 May
Faceit ELO: 1,199 +0 29 Aug – 18 Sept · 4 observations
1,1991,199peak 1,19929 Aug18 Sept
18,547Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,199Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-03-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,199
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 2 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAimhoTFACEITLevel 5 · 1,199 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,199csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning43
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–51–1Last 10048%Win rateLWWLLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating · +12.3pp headshot accuracy · +50ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.06), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 727ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 686ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 661ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.6 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility7.5
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch1.8

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 75 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 666ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.3
Utility7.5
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time664ms+17ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 664ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 9 Apr →
69%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · ancient, 21 Jul →
453msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · nuke, 13 Mar →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 27 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
7–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 57% over 14mirageWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2912–1741%-0.00
nukeB2312–1152%-0.01
overpassB158–753%-0.01
ancientA148–657%0.01
anubisC104–640%-0.00
mirageD51–420%-0.01
dust2—43–175%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

239Matches
49%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
79.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient978%0.8812.4
Inferno580%1.2819.6
Nuke450%1.2018.5
Anubis333%0.7513.3
Overpass20%0.7711.0
Vertigo250%0.428.0
Mirage1100%1.8613.0
Dust21100%0.6312.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
75.6%Counter-strafing
12.0°Preaim
666msReaction time
22.8%T opening success
49.6%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
13.8%Flash assists
10.81HE damage / grenade
11.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.0451° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–130.0425%23 Oct →
mirage13–40.0426%1 Aug →
dust213–20.1421%1 Aug →
inferno8–130.0225%1 Aug →
nuke10–130.0119%21 Jul →
ancient13–40.0169%21 Jul →
overpass14–16-0.0322%23 May →
inferno11–13-0.0122%23 May →
nuke13–70.0350%23 May →
overpass6–130.0124%17 May →
inferno16–12-0.0619%17 May →
dust213–9-0.079%15 May →
inferno10–13-0.0023%15 May →
overpass13–4-0.080%15 May →
nuke13–6-0.0224%3 May →
nuke13–2-0.0428%3 May →
anubis13–10-0.0219%3 May →
nuke13–90.0126%3 May →
inferno12–16-0.0616%2 May →
nuke13–40.0215%2 May →
inferno8–130.0220%19 Apr →
nuke10–13-0.0223%12 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0422%12 Apr →
nuke9–13-0.0724%10 Apr →
inferno9–13-0.0223%10 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0022%10 Apr →
nuke13–10-0.0713%10 Apr →
overpass13–110.0111%10 Apr →
ancient7–130.0320%9 Apr →
inferno13–40.1627%9 Apr →
inferno4–13-0.0426%5 Apr →
nuke5–13-0.0745%5 Apr →
overpass5–13-0.0911%5 Apr →
nuke14–16-0.0225%5 Apr →
inferno14–16-0.0715%5 Apr →
ancient2–13-0.0115%5 Apr →
inferno16–14-0.0033%5 Apr →
inferno9–130.0017%4 Apr →
inferno16–14-0.0213%3 Apr →
inferno8–13-0.0418%3 Apr →
nuke13–10-0.0215%3 Apr →
inferno13–40.0112%3 Apr →
ancient13–8-0.0023%3 Apr →
ancient4–13-0.0430%3 Apr →
inferno13–160.0221%2 Apr →
mirage14–16-0.0112%2 Apr →
inferno13–11-0.0321%2 Apr →
overpass14–16-0.0516%2 Apr →
inferno4–13-0.077%29 Mar →
ancient13–90.0611%28 Mar →
overpass13–11-0.0217%28 Mar →
overpass13–50.0411%28 Mar →
anubis15–15-0.0111%27 Mar →
overpass13–80.018%27 Mar →
nuke13–10.0418%27 Mar →
inferno13–100.0913%27 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0421%27 Mar →
anubis14–16-0.0013%26 Mar →
anubis9–13-0.048%26 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.015%25 Mar →
anubis13–90.0312%25 Mar →
nuke13–11-0.0618%25 Mar →
overpass13–6-0.0132%24 Mar →
inferno13–90.0217%23 Mar →
overpass10–13-0.0214%23 Mar →
inferno9–13-0.0311%23 Mar →
overpass10–13-0.0124%23 Mar →
nuke10–130.0021%23 Mar →
inferno4–130.0320%23 Mar →
ancient5–13-0.0321%23 Mar →
anubis13–40.0516%22 Mar →
nuke13–11-0.0427%22 Mar →
inferno7–13-0.0029%21 Mar →
inferno13–50.0222%21 Mar →
inferno13–8-0.0215%21 Mar →
overpass10–13-0.0120%21 Mar →
inferno14–160.0318%16 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.0518%15 Mar →
anubis9–13-0.1023%15 Mar →
overpass13–70.0240%15 Mar →
ancient13–40.0520%15 Mar →
ancient13–5-0.048%15 Mar →
nuke13–50.0410%15 Mar →
nuke10–13-0.0019%15 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0731%15 Mar →
ancient13–3-0.045%15 Mar →
anubis13–50.0114%15 Mar →
inferno13–70.0730%14 Mar →
overpass13–50.0441%14 Mar →
inferno13–10-0.0127%14 Mar →
nuke8–13-0.0230%14 Mar →
nuke8–130.0122%14 Mar →
anubis9–13-0.0015%13 Mar →
ancient13–80.0121%13 Mar →
nuke8–13-0.0410%13 Mar →
nuke13–100.0319%13 Mar →
ancient8–13-0.0316%13 Mar →
ancient13–40.1116%13 Mar →
anubis10–130.0410%8 Mar →
nuke11–13-0.0032%8 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.