John McClane

John McClane — CS2 Stats

76561197960320994[U:1:55266]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,943Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating14,999Blue band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,689 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,943 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 53 days played since 6 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,999 -2,044 16 May18 Sept · 28 days played
13,55117,370peak 17,37016 May18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,689 +0 1 Sept18 Sept · 4 observations
1,6891,689peak 1,6891 Sept18 Sept
17,421Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,689Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2026-05-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,689
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 62 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,371 below peak (17,370)
  • +1,448 over 30 days · improving
  • -1,957 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJohn McClaneFACEITLevel 8 · 1,689 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER14,999 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,689csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning67
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45532Last 10045%Win rateWWWWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · +58ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility6.9
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels5.5
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning6.7
Utility6.9
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time525ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 541ms → last ⅓ avg 525ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 24 Aug
67%Best headshot accuracy · 0–7 · dust2, 26 Jul
297msFastest reaction time · 0–7 · dust2, 26 Jul
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 31 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W4Current streak
47In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 57% over 30infernoWeakest map · 35% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A30171357%0.00
ancientC2191243%-0.01
infernoC2071335%-0.01
nukeB126650%-0.00
cacheC94544%-0.02
mirage42250%-0.01
anubis4040%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

919Matches
50%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
68.8ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient21151%0.9813.9
Dust219858%1.0714.9
Inferno16153%1.0114.2
Anubis15047%0.9413.2
Nuke8540%0.9714.8
Mirage5638%0.8713.9
Vertigo2741%0.9013.6
Overpass1030%0.9412.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.9%Spray accuracy
74.0%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
520msReaction time
39.5%T opening success
64.6%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
14.2%Flash assists
8.37HE damage / grenade
19.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.5081% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0433%15 Sept
mirage13–40.0619%15 Sept
cache13–90.0518%14 Sept
inferno13–20.0138%14 Sept
dust29–13-0.027%13 Sept
cache7–13-0.1124%9 Sept
cache13–100.0213%9 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0222%8 Sept
cache9–130.0119%8 Sept
dust213–7-0.0511%8 Sept
cache13–10-0.0630%6 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0113%1 Sept
dust24–13-0.067%1 Sept
dust222–19-0.0116%30 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0410%24 Aug
dust213–70.1332%24 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0324%24 Aug
dust25–13-0.0629%24 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0133%21 Aug
inferno13–70.0315%18 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0529%18 Aug
nuke13–30.0714%17 Aug
cache13–16-0.0118%17 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0218%15 Aug
dust213–100.0013%13 Aug
dust213–70.0216%9 Aug
cache8–13-0.0224%8 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0010%8 Aug
dust213–7-0.0119%7 Aug
ancient13–80.0112%7 Aug
inferno13–90.0112%4 Aug
inferno9–130.0118%1 Aug
ancient13–80.0411%1 Aug
nuke13–90.0217%31 Jul
inferno13–10.1331%31 Jul
dust27–130.0313%31 Jul
inferno7–130.0617%29 Jul
ancient3–13-0.067%29 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0512%28 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0618%27 Jul
dust213–70.050%27 Jul
inferno6–130.0123%27 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0830%27 Jul
ancient11–13-0.045%26 Jul
dust20–7-0.0667%26 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0219%14 Jul
dust213–16-0.0124%13 Jul
cache13–5-0.0329%13 Jul
dust211–13-0.0219%9 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0111%8 Jul
dust213–60.0826%6 Jul
nuke13–50.0721%6 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0415%6 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0421%6 Jul
nuke13–60.0617%5 Jul
dust27–130.0611%5 Jul
inferno5–13-0.045%4 Jul
ancient16–120.0218%4 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0629%4 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0211%3 Jul
dust23–13-0.0716%3 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0114%3 Jul
inferno8–130.0415%3 Jul
ancient13–80.0518%1 Jul
dust213–3-0.049%1 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0228%30 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0212%30 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0112%30 Jun
anubis8–13-0.034%30 Jun
nuke4–13-0.044%26 Jun
dust213–5-0.0417%25 Jun
cache12–12-0.0510%25 Jun
anubis7–130.017%24 Jun
dust213–50.0517%23 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0712%22 Jun
dust213–3-0.0121%21 Jun
dust213–10.0724%21 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0511%16 Jun
dust213–80.0320%16 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0311%15 Jun
dust213–110.0124%15 Jun
inferno16–12-0.0215%14 Jun
anubis7–130.0019%3 Jun
dust213–90.0216%3 Jun
ancient13–70.0127%2 Jun
dust29–13-0.0614%2 Jun
dust26–13-0.0324%31 May
ancient13–70.0615%31 May
inferno8–10-0.0529%29 May
dust213–40.0414%29 May
ancient12–16-0.0213%29 May
inferno9–13-0.0326%26 May
inferno7–13-0.0635%24 May
inferno13–50.0130%24 May
nuke6–13-0.0713%23 May
ancient6–13-0.0111%23 May
ancient7–13-0.0415%16 May
dust22–13-0.0715%16 May
dust29–120.0132%10 May
nuke10–130.0124%6 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →