Sheng 罗盛荣

Sheng 罗盛荣 — CS2 Stats

CL76561197960282258[U:1:16530]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,223Tracked matches60%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating19,870Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#89563 of 261517 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 902 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Nov 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,870 +5,067 1 Aug – 9 Nov · 30 days played
13,10719,870peak 19,8701 Aug9 Nov
Faceit ELO: 902 +0 10 Sept – 30 Sept · 3 observations
902902peak 90210 Sept30 Sept
19,870Peak Premier in tracked matches
902Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-07-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 902
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 149 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-10
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 19,870
  • +4,089 over 30 days · improving
  • +5,067 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 130 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSheng 罗盛荣FACEITLevel 6 · 902 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,870 · Purple bandPEAK ELO902csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning26
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58–41–1Last 10058%Win rateWWLWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.4pp headshot accuracy · −60ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility5.2
Positioning2.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning2.6
Utility5.2
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact8.3

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time556ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy14.4%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 12.6% → last ⅓ avg 14.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–5 · mirage, 28 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · cache, 9 Nov →
375msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 2 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 9 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 14nukeWeakest map · 50% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B4121–2051%-0.04
nukeB147–750%-0.04
mirageA149–564%-0.04
ancientA127–558%-0.05
infernoA117–464%-0.02
cache—44–0100%-0.02
anubis—43–175%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

833Matches
52%Win rate
0.78Avg K/D
63.5ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust229854%0.7711.5
Inferno12855%0.8012.4
Nuke12056%0.8311.7
Ancient9651%0.7811.5
Anubis8248%0.7811.2
Mirage3119%0.619.8
Train2454%0.6611.0
Overpass1644%0.8112.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.9%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
73.2%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
546msReaction time
19.2%T opening success
22.8%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
6.97HE damage / grenade
9.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.8624% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.2177% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–110.0312%9 Nov →
cache13–00.0650%9 Nov →
ancient6–13-0.0615%8 Nov →
dust213–10-0.0411%7 Nov →
dust213–70.0315%7 Nov →
ancient8–13-0.0718%6 Nov →
nuke13–7-0.069%6 Nov →
nuke13–6-0.0217%6 Nov →
inferno13–11-0.080%5 Nov →
cache13–10-0.0533%5 Nov →
dust211–13-0.0421%5 Nov →
nuke13–11-0.0210%4 Nov →
mirage8–6-0.0821%4 Nov →
dust213–70.0114%4 Nov →
dust25–13-0.086%1 Nov →
mirage13–5-0.076%1 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0826%31 Oct →
inferno13–10.0424%31 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0316%29 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0113%29 Oct →
dust213–7-0.055%28 Oct →
ancient11–4-0.0413%28 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.032%28 Oct →
mirage13–50.099%28 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0517%20 Oct →
dust213–6-0.026%20 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0423%18 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.088%18 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.084%18 Oct →
ancient12–16-0.049%17 Oct →
mirage13–40.0212%17 Oct →
inferno13–1-0.0218%17 Oct →
cache13–6-0.039%17 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.069%17 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0923%17 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0522%10 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0318%10 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0810%10 Oct →
mirage13–0-0.0320%10 Oct →
cache13–4-0.058%10 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0117%10 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0423%10 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.100%10 Oct →
dust213–9-0.057%9 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0225%9 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0213%9 Oct →
anubis13–4-0.0510%3 Oct →
nuke0–5-0.0650%2 Oct →
dust216–13-0.0614%29 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0314%29 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.029%25 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0622%25 Sept →
anubis13–30.0417%25 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0511%23 Sept →
nuke1–5-0.070%23 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0212%23 Sept →
dust213–80.0219%22 Sept →
dust213–1-0.0224%20 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0421%19 Sept →
inferno13–50.0120%18 Sept →
dust211–13-0.086%17 Sept →
inferno13–110.0318%13 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0313%11 Sept →
dust22–13-0.106%11 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.068%10 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0614%9 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0833%9 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.062%2 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0418%2 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0719%2 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0027%8 Aug →
dust27–13-0.047%1 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0313%1 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0113%1 Aug →
dust213–6-0.1013%1 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0415%1 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0521%1 Aug →
inferno13–2-0.037%1 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.069%1 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0715%31 Jul →
anubis13–9-0.0417%30 Jul →
dust216–13-0.088%30 Jul →
inferno13–4-0.056%29 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0614%24 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0111%24 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0819%24 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0214%23 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.059%22 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0113%19 Jul →
dust27–13-0.019%19 Jul →
dust29–13-0.046%19 Jul →
dust23–13-0.100%18 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0311%18 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0410%18 Jul →
dust215–15-0.057%17 Jul →
dust28–130.0112%16 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0536%16 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.049%15 Jul →
dust213–16-0.0613%14 Jul →
dust214–16-0.0316%4 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.