eskimo

eskimo — CS2 Stats

FI76561197960278628[U:1:12900]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,432Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating19,312Top 50% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#87956 of 238261 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 6 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,312 +1,379 6 Jul22 Sept · 29 days played
17,93320,106peak 20,1066 Jul22 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,022 +0 30 Aug19 Sept · 3 observations
1,0221,022peak 1,02230 Aug19 Sept
20,106Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,022Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-07-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,022
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 29 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 794 below peak (20,106)
  • +695 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,379 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 688 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGeskimoPREMIER19,312 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,022csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning41
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD56431Last 10056%Win rateLWLLLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −19ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.7 against its own average).

Aim4.8
Utility7.2
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 64% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 31% on CT to 14% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning4.1
Utility7.2
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time575ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy13.4%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 10.8% → last ⅓ avg 13.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–1 · inferno, 9 Sept
33%Best headshot accuracy · 1–5 · cache, 18 Sept
367msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · ancient, 14 Sept
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 16 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 74% over 27anubisWeakest map · 29% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2720774%-0.01
ancientS2416867%-0.01
nukeB21111052%-0.02
anubisD1751229%-0.03
cacheC73443%-0.02
dust221150%-0.02
mirage2020%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

753Matches
50%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
69.9ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke3471%0.9611.8
Inferno3474%0.9212.8
Ancient2864%0.8812.2
Dust21338%0.8712.3
Anubis1346%0.8713.9
Overpass540%0.7615.0
Train475%0.8612.8
Mirage2100%1.6212.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.9%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
68.0%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
561msReaction time
14.4%T opening success
30.8%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
10.14HE damage / grenade
13.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.9387% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 14.3556% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache8–13-0.025%22 Sept
inferno13–10-0.039%22 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0013%20 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0513%20 Sept
nuke2–13-0.0411%20 Sept
ancient13–90.0510%18 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0514%18 Sept
cache1–50.0333%18 Sept
inferno16–14-0.0116%17 Sept
nuke5–13-0.047%16 Sept
nuke13–0-0.0217%16 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0117%16 Sept
inferno6–13-0.058%15 Sept
cache5–13-0.079%15 Sept
ancient13–9-0.076%14 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0010%14 Sept
cache6–00.0610%14 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0513%13 Sept
inferno13–70.0017%11 Sept
anubis15–15-0.0618%10 Sept
nuke1–13-0.078%10 Sept
anubis12–16-0.0613%9 Sept
inferno13–10.1111%9 Sept
ancient13–60.0224%8 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0212%8 Sept
cache8–00.0112%6 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0116%6 Sept
inferno13–5-0.089%3 Sept
ancient13–100.0111%3 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0421%2 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0017%2 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0320%24 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0212%23 Aug
ancient9–13-0.009%22 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0118%22 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0215%22 Aug
ancient8–13-0.085%19 Aug
inferno13–50.0111%19 Aug
dust219–16-0.0218%17 Aug
cache13–10-0.097%17 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0210%12 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0016%12 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0413%12 Aug
inferno13–7-0.038%9 Aug
anubis13–100.0015%9 Aug
nuke13–50.0117%9 Aug
inferno3–13-0.076%8 Aug
anubis13–110.0221%8 Aug
ancient11–13-0.089%7 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0110%7 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0414%6 Aug
inferno13–80.0412%5 Aug
dust210–13-0.0213%5 Aug
nuke13–2-0.038%4 Aug
ancient13–60.089%4 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0211%3 Aug
nuke13–20.089%2 Aug
nuke13–70.0224%31 Jul
ancient13–100.0319%31 Jul
nuke0–4-0.070%31 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0316%30 Jul
ancient13–50.043%30 Jul
inferno13–80.0223%30 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0512%29 Jul
mirage6–13-0.076%29 Jul
ancient7–130.0019%29 Jul
anubis12–16-0.082%26 Jul
anubis6–13-0.017%26 Jul
nuke16–140.014%25 Jul
inferno13–20.0210%25 Jul
inferno13–110.0617%23 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0324%22 Jul
anubis13–90.016%22 Jul
inferno13–90.0216%22 Jul
inferno9–13-0.054%21 Jul
nuke13–110.008%21 Jul
nuke13–7-0.039%20 Jul
ancient16–12-0.0215%20 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0913%18 Jul
anubis10–13-0.019%18 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0611%17 Jul
nuke13–16-0.059%17 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0118%16 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0111%16 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0623%16 Jul
inferno12–16-0.055%15 Jul
inferno13–70.0310%14 Jul
ancient6–130.0110%14 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0117%13 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0214%13 Jul
ancient13–50.0212%12 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0310%12 Jul
ancient13–10-0.002%11 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0111%11 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0310%10 Jul
nuke13–70.017%10 Jul
anubis9–13-0.054%9 Jul
cache4–13-0.0614%9 Jul
anubis8–13-0.078%6 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0210%6 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →