← Back to Matches
Stake Pulse · Beat II 2026 · Group A
C-Tier

FOKUS vs Sangal

Finished
Format: BO3·Played: Sep 21, 18:50 UTC
Like what you see? Place your bets on live CS2 matches.Bet on This Match →

Map Results

Dust2Dust2Map 1
WFOKUS
WL
LSangal
Duration: 40:36
NukeNukeMap 2
LFOKUS
LW
WSangal
Duration: 50:22
MirageMirageMap 3
LFOKUS
LW
WSangal
Duration: 50:03

Streams

Map Breakdown

Series best: jocab 1.43 average rating across 3 maps.

Mirage

Sangal 1311 FOKUS
Sangal1st half 5 · 2nd half 8CT 8/12 · T 5/12Pistols 1/2
FOKUS1st half 7 · 2nd half 4CT 7/12 · T 4/12Pistols 1/2
PlayerKDA+/−ADRKASTRating
jocabFOKUS23157+893.579%1.75
JoeySangal21106+1194.179%1.64
bnoxSangal20135+784.979%1.36
BanjoFOKUS10144-447.479%1.03
podiFOKUS14177-373.067%0.89
adamSSangal131310+068.679%0.88
R4DYXSangal17165+178.458%0.86
MatheosFOKUS13203-754.858%0.75
ztrFOKUS101813-855.763%0.73
puuhaSangal13186-560.058%0.62

Nuke

Sangal 1311 FOKUS
Sangal1st half 4 · 2nd half 9CT 9/12 · T 4/12Pistols 2/2
FOKUS1st half 8 · 2nd half 3CT 8/12 · T 3/12Pistols 0/2

Sangal came back from 4 rounds down (4–8) to win the map.

PlayerKDA+/−ADRKASTRating
jocabFOKUS19157+484.596%1.34
R4DYXSangal20144+689.267%1.25
MatheosFOKUS21165+593.471%1.23
JoeySangal15165-173.988%1.19
adamSSangal19120+774.371%1.16
puuhaSangal13184-560.275%0.96
BanjoFOKUS12164-457.075%0.92
bnoxSangal11154-454.967%0.87
ztrFOKUS9169-754.975%0.83
podiFOKUS13154-254.875%0.75

Dust2

Sangal 313 FOKUS
Sangal1st half 3 · 2nd half 0CT 3/12 · T 0/4Pistols 0/2
FOKUS1st half 9 · 2nd half 4CT 4/4 · T 9/12Pistols 2/2
PlayerKDA+/−ADRKASTRating
podiFOKUS1957+14111.6100%2.12
MatheosFOKUS17105+7115.681%1.81
BanjoFOKUS1462+879.288%1.48
jocabFOKUS1295+381.188%1.20
adamSSangal11147-378.681%1.01
bnoxSangal9130-477.863%0.92
puuhaSangal7155-869.269%0.84
JoeySangal10135-350.950%0.84
R4DYXSangal7151-857.056%0.49
ztrFOKUS7144-745.863%0.45

About FOKUS vs Sangal

This BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match is part of Group A on the Stake Pulse circuit. Sangal took the series 1–2. For head-to-head form and predicted lineups, see the head-to-head tool and the prediction model.