← Back to Matches
BLAST Open · Rotterdam Spring 2026 · Group B
A-Tier

NIP vs Liquid

SE
1:2
Finished
Format: BO3·Played: Mar 21, 14:07 UTC
Like what you see? Place your bets on live CS2 matches.Bet on This Match →

Map Results

NukeNukeMap 1
WNIP
W–L
LLiquid
Duration: 31:23
MirageMirageMap 2
LNIP
L–W
WLiquid
Duration: 77:26
AncientAncientMap 3
LNIP
L–W
WLiquid
Duration: 46:21

Streams

Map Breakdown

Series best: xKacpersky — 1.30 average rating across 3 maps.

Ancient

Liquid 13–9 NIP
Liquid1st half 8 · 2nd half 5CT 8/12 · T 5/10Pistols 0/2
NIP1st half 4 · 2nd half 5CT 5/10 · T 4/12Pistols 2/2
PlayerKDA+/−ADRKASTRating
siuhyLiquid22117+11103.191%1.42
EliGELiquid22143+899.577%1.34
ultimateLiquid17116+686.077%1.18
r1nkleNIP13165-376.764%1.16
xKacperskyNIP15195-491.473%1.04
cairneNIP16153+168.364%0.98
malbsMdLiquid12137-152.573%0.89
NAFLiquid10128-260.568%0.87
SnappiNIP11174-661.864%0.82
sjuushNIP6165-1036.546%0.61

Mirage

Liquid 19–17 NIP
Liquid1st half 6 · 2nd half 6 · OT 7CT 10/18 · T 9/18Pistols 2/6
NIP1st half 6 · 2nd half 6 · OT 5CT 9/18 · T 8/18Pistols 4/6

Liquid came back from 4 rounds down (0–4) to win the map.

PlayerKDA+/−ADRKASTRating
malbsMdLiquid28279+181.169%1.28
xKacperskyNIP292714+297.872%1.26
ultimateLiquid28223+672.875%1.17
EliGELiquid24229+272.164%1.14
SnappiNIP21207+161.367%0.99
siuhyLiquid192310-463.572%0.98
NAFLiquid18247-657.372%0.89
r1nkleNIP25214+472.864%0.88
cairneNIP25277-275.461%0.88
sjuushNIP162210-648.669%0.76

Nuke

Liquid 3–13 NIP
Liquid1st half 3 · 2nd half 0CT 3/12 · T 0/4Pistols 1/2
NIP1st half 9 · 2nd half 4CT 4/4 · T 9/12Pistols 1/2
PlayerKDA+/−ADRKASTRating
sjuushNIP1776+10106.194%1.90
SnappiNIP1354+888.288%1.63
xKacperskyNIP1594+691.169%1.61
NAFLiquid13123+1103.163%1.44
r1nkleNIP1274+574.881%1.16
cairneNIP1293+373.375%1.11
EliGELiquid10140-457.638%0.73
siuhyLiquid5155-1047.650%0.55
malbsMdLiquid4142-1036.250%0.38
ultimateLiquid4142-1045.444%0.36

About NIP vs Liquid

This BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match is part of Group B on the BLAST Open circuit. Liquid took the series 1–2. For head-to-head form and predicted lineups, see the head-to-head tool and the prediction model.