Techno Viking

Techno Viking — CS2 Stats

76561199817271821[U:1:1857006093]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

463Tracked matches69%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating15,705Purple band · top ~25.6% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 20 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,705 +3,915 20 May17 Sept · 31 days played
10,00016,193peak 16,19320 May17 Sept
16,193Peak Premier in tracked matches
37Days played since 2026-05-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 488 below peak (16,193)
  • +2,649 over 30 days · improving
  • +3,727 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,295 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTechno VikingPREMIER15,705 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning43
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59383Last 10059%Win rateLLWWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · −83ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 1451 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility7.3
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels2.5

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.3
Utility7.3
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time603ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 661ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms
Headshot accuracy23.9%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 23.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–0 · shelter, 14 Jul
53%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · nuke, 10 Sept
375msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · office, 21 Aug
13–0Biggest win · shelter, 14 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
105In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6ancientWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS1913668%0.00
dust2B178947%-0.01
mirageA1710759%-0.01
nukeC167944%-0.03
officeS97278%0.01
cacheS65183%0.01
ancientC52340%0.01
vertigo42250%-0.01
anubis330100%0.02
poseidon1010%-0.14
debris110100%0.18
eldorado1010%-0.03
shelter110100%0.20

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.7%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
601msReaction time
30.9%T opening success
50.0%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
12.49HE damage / grenade
15.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.9436% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–130.0221%17 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0030%17 Sept
office13–70.0125%17 Sept
dust213–110.0320%16 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0415%10 Sept
nuke13–10.0453%10 Sept
mirage13–100.0335%8 Sept
inferno13–2-0.0417%8 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0021%3 Sept
inferno7–130.0120%2 Sept
office13–70.0621%2 Sept
inferno13–110.0330%29 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0820%29 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0318%28 Aug
office13–11-0.0026%28 Aug
cache13–6-0.019%26 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0635%24 Aug
dust213–11-0.0717%24 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0328%24 Aug
dust28–130.0121%24 Aug
office13–80.0321%24 Aug
nuke13–90.0119%24 Aug
mirage13–40.0816%23 Aug
office13–5-0.0145%21 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0220%20 Aug
dust210–130.0221%20 Aug
office5–13-0.0316%20 Aug
inferno13–110.0630%13 Aug
dust216–13-0.0226%13 Aug
dust26–13-0.0225%13 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0516%13 Aug
vertigo13–40.0119%6 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0733%6 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.0118%6 Aug
office3–13-0.0732%6 Aug
office13–70.0930%6 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0518%3 Aug
dust28–130.0413%29 Jul
inferno16–12-0.0421%26 Jul
dust213–5-0.0019%26 Jul
dust24–130.0222%25 Jul
inferno13–80.0315%23 Jul
anubis13–80.0219%23 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0424%23 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0516%19 Jul
nuke5–13-0.1027%15 Jul
dust24–13-0.0638%15 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0719%15 Jul
nuke13–10.1137%15 Jul
inferno5–130.0214%15 Jul
inferno13–70.0326%15 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0128%15 Jul
mirage13–40.0530%15 Jul
inferno13–10.0717%15 Jul
mirage13–60.0319%15 Jul
nuke8–130.0131%15 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0516%15 Jul
cache16–14-0.0216%14 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0536%14 Jul
dust213–10.0830%14 Jul
dust213–8-0.0218%14 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0345%14 Jul
poseidon6–9-0.1422%14 Jul
debris9–20.1841%14 Jul
eldorado4–9-0.0343%14 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0235%14 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0421%14 Jul
inferno2–110.0413%14 Jul
shelter13–00.2013%14 Jul
dust211–13-0.0014%13 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0739%13 Jul
vertigo13–9-0.0213%8 Jul
cache13–50.0726%8 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0321%6 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0216%6 Jul
cache10–13-0.0127%6 Jul
inferno13–50.0629%4 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0616%4 Jul
anubis13–30.0230%4 Jul
mirage8–130.0014%26 Jun
cache13–60.0123%25 Jun
vertigo7–13-0.0342%25 Jun
dust213–9-0.0218%18 Jun
mirage13–3-0.0330%18 Jun
cache13–20.0333%18 Jun
dust29–13-0.0914%18 Jun
inferno16–14-0.0327%17 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0324%17 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0114%11 Jun
anubis13–40.0219%11 Jun
ancient13–3-0.0211%10 Jun
ancient8–130.0620%8 Jun
office13–80.0527%8 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0430%24 May
nuke14–16-0.0221%24 May
mirage9–13-0.0136%22 May
nuke11–13-0.0733%22 May
nuke15–150.0128%20 May
ancient13–10.0918%20 May
dust213–10-0.0327%20 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →