Evan no hops

Evan no hops — CS2 Stats

EE76561199655788036[U:1:1695522308]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,349Tracked matches54%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating16,573Purple band · top ~22.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,034 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 18 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,573 -4,280 18 Apr19 Sept · 7 days played
16,57321,272peak 21,27218 Apr19 Sept
21,628Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,034Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-04-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,034
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 17 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-18
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,699 below peak (21,272)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,427 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEvan no hopsFACEITLevel 4 · 1,034 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER16,573 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,034csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning49
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY404911Last 10040%Win rateLWLTLWTWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 646ms

Last 10

  • 532 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 645ms

Last 20

  • 1172 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 649ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility5.9
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 651ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.9
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact6.3

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time640ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 640ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 9–7 · vertigo, 25 Apr
48%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · cache, 15 Jun
438msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 15 Aug
13–0Biggest win · cache, 15 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
712In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 48% over 29anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B29141548%-0.00
mirageC2191243%-0.00
cacheD1751229%0.01
infernoB136746%0.01
ancientD103730%0.00
anubisD5050%-0.02
nuke21150%0.04
overpass21150%-0.05
vertigo110100%0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3Matches
100%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
77.4ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

14%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1100%1.0427.0
Mirage1100%0.7512.0
Dust21100%1.6418.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
651msReaction time
27.2%T opening success
45.5%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
11.7%Flash assists
5.08HE damage / grenade
8.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.2246% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient7–13-0.0317%20 Sept
dust213–70.0118%19 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0528%19 Sept
ancient12–120.0311%19 Sept
dust210–13-0.0317%19 Sept
dust213–110.0413%19 Sept
dust212–120.0117%18 Sept
dust29–2-0.0125%18 Sept
ancient13–70.0321%18 Sept
dust213–50.0815%13 Sept
dust213–90.0226%12 Sept
cache13–80.0619%12 Sept
dust25–13-0.0717%12 Sept
mirage13–80.0419%3 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0121%3 Sept
dust24–8-0.0112%3 Sept
inferno5–9-0.0211%30 Aug
dust27–130.0011%30 Aug
mirage13–50.0210%30 Aug
dust213–10-0.0126%26 Aug
dust213–11-0.0517%23 Aug
mirage8–13-0.045%23 Aug
dust29–11-0.097%22 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0117%22 Aug
cache11–13-0.0619%22 Aug
mirage13–70.0419%16 Aug
inferno9–130.0012%16 Aug
cache12–12-0.0119%16 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0414%15 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0023%15 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0832%14 Aug
dust213–40.1020%14 Aug
dust28–13-0.0519%10 Aug
inferno13–60.0616%8 Aug
cache9–13-0.0119%5 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0211%3 Aug
nuke11–130.0737%3 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0013%2 Aug
anubis11–130.0410%1 Jul
overpass4–13-0.0325%1 Jul
cache8–130.0125%28 Jun
dust28–13-0.0810%20 Jun
mirage13–70.0115%20 Jun
mirage8–130.0214%18 Jun
dust211–130.0116%18 Jun
dust211–130.0518%16 Jun
dust213–90.0223%16 Jun
dust213–110.0517%15 Jun
dust213–70.0512%15 Jun
cache13–00.0648%15 Jun
ancient13–16-0.0112%14 Jun
cache9–13-0.0229%31 May
mirage8–130.0021%31 May
mirage12–120.0120%30 May
cache10–13-0.0020%30 May
dust212–12-0.0114%29 May
mirage8–13-0.0425%23 May
anubis9–13-0.0625%21 May
dust213–7-0.0125%20 May
mirage7–13-0.0135%20 May
mirage11–13-0.0225%17 May
cache12–120.0634%14 May
cache12–120.0315%14 May
cache12–120.0927%13 May
cache13–10-0.0224%13 May
cache8–13-0.064%11 May
cache13–10-0.0232%10 May
cache9–130.0225%1 May
cache13–20.0713%1 May
cache5–13-0.0540%30 Apr
mirage10–130.0211%27 Apr
mirage16–13-0.0521%27 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0515%25 Apr
dust213–10-0.076%25 Apr
mirage12–120.0844%25 Apr
vertigo9–70.1419%25 Apr
dust25–13-0.0215%25 Apr
ancient13–110.0423%24 Apr
inferno12–16-0.0320%24 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0121%24 Apr
dust24–13-0.0216%24 Apr
anubis9–130.0129%23 Apr
dust210–13-0.0518%23 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0118%23 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0016%23 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0511%21 Apr
dust211–13-0.0422%21 Apr
mirage13–90.0417%20 Apr
inferno13–70.1223%20 Apr
mirage13–40.0523%20 Apr
inferno11–130.0819%20 Apr
inferno6–130.0119%20 Apr
ancient14–16-0.0013%19 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0018%19 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0315%19 Apr
inferno13–40.0319%18 Apr
dust213–60.1032%18 Apr
inferno11–13-0.079%18 Apr
overpass13–6-0.0716%18 Apr
ancient10–130.0330%18 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →