m4xus

m4xus — CS2 Stats

CO76561199654037468[U:1:1693771740]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

830Tracked matches41%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,102Purple band · top ~28% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 831 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 25 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,102 -2,353 25 Jun17 Sept · 25 days played
15,10218,312peak 18,31225 Jun17 Sept
18,536Peak Premier in tracked matches
831Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2026-06-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 831
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 70 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,210 below peak (18,312)
  • -1,527 over 30 days · declining
  • -2,353 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,898 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGm4xusFACEITLevel 8 · 831 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER15,102 · Purple bandPEAK ELO831csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning55
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49474Last 10049%Win rateLLLTLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +5.1pp headshot accuracy · −43ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 041 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility4.6
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.5
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time614ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 671ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 24.1% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 9–13 · nuke, 8 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · inferno, 19 Aug
453msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · vertigo, 22 Aug
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 7 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 57% over 14ancientWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB35181751%0.01
nukeB157847%0.02
infernoB147750%0.01
anubisA148657%0.00
cacheB115645%0.03
ancientD61517%0.02
vertigo32167%0.03
shelter1010%-0.01
dust2110100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

328Matches
51%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
88.0ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10950%1.2617.9
Anubis5450%1.0215.7
Inferno4450%1.2017.4
Dust23656%1.1116.7
Nuke3656%1.1817.4
Ancient2635%1.0216.1
Vertigo1250%1.1015.0
Cache967%1.0914.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
79.7%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
614msReaction time
41.4%T opening success
39.8%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
8.65HE damage / grenade
9.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4119 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.8031% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke4–13-0.0138%18 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0416%17 Sept
ancient10–130.0319%17 Sept
mirage12–12-0.0128%15 Sept
mirage1–13-0.0232%14 Sept
mirage8–130.0322%14 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0522%10 Sept
cache13–90.0431%9 Sept
mirage13–20.0621%9 Sept
inferno16–130.0125%9 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0118%8 Sept
ancient13–30.0115%8 Sept
mirage13–60.0825%8 Sept
mirage13–100.0123%8 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0116%7 Sept
mirage0–13-0.0927%7 Sept
nuke16–140.0317%5 Sept
mirage13–60.0118%5 Sept
anubis13–5-0.0319%4 Sept
nuke9–130.0526%29 Aug
ancient11–130.0427%27 Aug
nuke8–130.0225%25 Aug
vertigo7–13-0.0113%22 Aug
vertigo13–50.0817%22 Aug
mirage7–130.0219%21 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0034%20 Aug
inferno8–130.0350%19 Aug
vertigo13–100.0225%17 Aug
mirage7–130.049%14 Aug
mirage13–20.0117%14 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0113%14 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0121%13 Aug
mirage5–130.0134%13 Aug
cache6–13-0.0539%12 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0311%12 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0621%11 Aug
mirage13–40.0427%11 Aug
nuke9–130.1532%8 Aug
inferno13–70.1234%8 Aug
anubis13–100.0421%8 Aug
cache4–13-0.0327%7 Aug
mirage13–10.0813%7 Aug
cache13–80.0311%6 Aug
mirage13–60.0517%6 Aug
anubis16–130.0519%5 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0020%3 Aug
anubis13–50.0325%3 Aug
ancient11–130.0413%3 Aug
anubis11–130.0336%2 Aug
nuke13–70.1129%2 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0521%1 Aug
mirage4–13-0.1030%31 Jul
anubis9–130.0115%31 Jul
mirage9–13-0.088%31 Jul
nuke13–9-0.008%31 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0736%31 Jul
nuke6–130.0112%30 Jul
anubis13–80.0329%30 Jul
mirage13–100.0446%30 Jul
mirage10–130.0616%29 Jul
anubis13–90.0421%29 Jul
ancient3–13-0.029%28 Jul
nuke5–2-0.0250%28 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0014%28 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0119%27 Jul
mirage7–13-0.088%23 Jul
cache10–130.0721%23 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0132%23 Jul
cache13–40.0530%23 Jul
nuke13–110.0017%23 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0513%22 Jul
cache13–70.0619%22 Jul
mirage13–110.0731%22 Jul
mirage13–110.0118%22 Jul
mirage16–130.0321%21 Jul
inferno13–30.1022%21 Jul
cache13–16-0.0123%20 Jul
mirage13–70.0928%20 Jul
inferno13–100.0130%20 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0423%19 Jul
mirage13–60.0423%19 Jul
anubis1–13-0.0418%17 Jul
shelter12–12-0.0125%17 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0324%16 Jul
inferno13–50.1238%8 Jul
mirage13–110.0121%8 Jul
dust213–90.1024%7 Jul
mirage2–130.0335%7 Jul
cache12–120.0415%6 Jul
cache6–130.0530%6 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0219%5 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0632%5 Jul
nuke16–130.0321%26 Jun
inferno4–130.0226%26 Jun
mirage13–90.0115%26 Jun
anubis13–7-0.0131%25 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0526%25 Jun
nuke13–20.0519%25 Jun
mirage13–100.0825%25 Jun
cache13–90.0522%25 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →