тинтин

тинтин — CS2 Stats

SE76561199546410525[U:1:1586144797]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,760Tracked matches53%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#61429 of 251437 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,785 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (20 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,785 → 1,785
+36Tracked matches · now 2,760
−3.3ppWin rate · 56.7% → 53.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,468 +0 30 Aug – 23 Sept · 4 observations
21,46821,468peak 21,46830 Aug23 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,785 +0 30 Aug – 23 Sept · 4 observations
1,7851,785peak 1,78530 Aug23 Sept
21,468Peak Premier on CSDB
1,785Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-05-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,785
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 216 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGтинтинFACEITLevel 8 · 1,785 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,785csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning50
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–49Last 10051%Win rateWLLWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −3.4pp headshot accuracy · −84ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility4.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.0
Utility4.6
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time605ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 10–13 · mirage, 21 May →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 0–5 · mirage, 8 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · mirage, 23 May →
13–1Biggest win · vertigo, 19 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
8–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 68% over 25ancientWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB5427–2750%-0.01
vertigoS2517–868%-0.01
ancientC114–736%-0.02
anubis—43–175%0.01
nuke—20–20%-0.06
dust2—20–20%-0.01
inferno—10–10%-0.03
cache—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

744Matches
53%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
69.6ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19258%0.8813.4
Ancient16252%0.9214.7
Anubis12555%0.8413.7
Inferno8949%0.7612.8
Dust25448%0.9213.9
Nuke5135%0.8113.6
Vertigo4262%0.7812.4
Overpass1953%0.8714.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
41.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.7%Spray accuracy
88.2%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
605msReaction time
40.9%T opening success
28.8%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
9.56HE damage / grenade
5.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 28.8038% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–7-0.0223%12 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0314%12 Oct →
nuke13–16-0.0816%7 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0311%7 Oct →
ancient13–40.0633%7 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0115%30 Sept →
mirage13–30.0417%29 Sept →
vertigo10–13-0.0217%29 Sept →
mirage13–90.0312%29 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0310%28 Sept →
mirage11–130.0218%28 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0517%22 Sept →
vertigo19–16-0.0121%21 Sept →
mirage9–130.0419%21 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0219%18 Sept →
ancient11–130.0120%18 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0518%17 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0218%17 Sept →
vertigo13–8-0.0221%17 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0331%17 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0020%16 Sept →
mirage13–40.0021%16 Sept →
vertigo13–160.0320%16 Sept →
mirage13–60.0321%16 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0914%15 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0421%15 Sept →
dust27–130.0117%15 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0624%15 Sept →
vertigo13–9-0.0410%15 Sept →
vertigo13–10-0.0912%14 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0611%14 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0120%14 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0914%14 Sept →
vertigo13–40.0328%11 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0217%10 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0523%10 Sept →
mirage13–90.0213%10 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0118%9 Sept →
vertigo13–9-0.0433%9 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0334%9 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0217%8 Sept →
vertigo13–7-0.0123%8 Sept →
mirage13–60.0518%8 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0320%8 Sept →
mirage0–5-0.0360%8 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0724%5 Jul →
ancient7–3-0.0112%5 Jul →
vertigo13–40.0723%5 Jul →
mirage13–70.0927%5 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0015%26 Jun →
anubis13–60.0633%26 Jun →
vertigo16–19-0.0321%20 Jun →
mirage13–100.0328%20 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.1019%16 Jun →
vertigo6–13-0.0421%16 Jun →
mirage13–100.0615%16 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0716%12 Jun →
mirage19–170.0326%12 Jun →
vertigo13–30.0742%12 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0614%12 Jun →
ancient13–50.0217%11 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0217%11 Jun →
vertigo9–13-0.0426%11 Jun →
mirage7–130.0523%11 Jun →
mirage13–100.0324%6 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0612%6 Jun →
vertigo13–7-0.0522%6 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0512%6 Jun →
mirage13–100.0930%2 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0829%2 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0313%2 Jun →
nuke14–16-0.0420%27 May →
mirage13–11-0.0237%27 May →
anubis13–10-0.0114%24 May →
vertigo16–140.0016%24 May →
mirage8–13-0.0024%24 May →
vertigo11–13-0.0521%24 May →
mirage4–13-0.0815%24 May →
mirage9–13-0.1112%23 May →
vertigo13–6-0.0719%23 May →
mirage16–120.0516%23 May →
mirage11–130.0022%23 May →
mirage10–130.1422%21 May →
mirage8–130.0323%21 May →
ancient3–13-0.0212%21 May →
anubis4–130.0019%21 May →
vertigo13–10-0.0515%20 May →
mirage11–13-0.0412%20 May →
vertigo13–80.0115%20 May →
mirage13–16-0.0513%20 May →
mirage11–13-0.0529%19 May →
vertigo13–1-0.0118%19 May →
ancient13–110.0220%19 May →
vertigo7–130.1027%18 May →
mirage13–60.0337%18 May →
mirage16–19-0.0328%18 May →
vertigo10–13-0.0225%18 May →
mirage13–9-0.0116%18 May →
ancient8–13-0.0131%18 May →
mirage13–100.0329%17 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.