pachob — CS2 Stats

76561199536202716[U:1:1575936988]

1,521Tracked matches45%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,435 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpachobFACEITLevel 10 · 2,435 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning52
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48493Last 10048%Win rateWLWWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression6.5
Utility5.8
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.2
Utility5.8
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time542ms+29ms
first ⅓ avg 513ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — nuke 9–13
130Biggest win — inferno
10Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 58% over 26anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA26151158%0.04
nukeB24121250%0.04
infernoB136746%0.04
ancientC125742%0.00
anubisD103730%0.00
overpassD62433%-0.05
dust243175%-0.00
cache31233%0.01
vertigo21150%0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,275Matches
53%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
84.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage33550%1.1417.4
Anubis19256%1.1517.1
Nuke16955%1.1417.8
Inferno16456%1.2117.9
Ancient13352%1.1016.4
Dust212447%1.0316.0
Overpass5454%1.1917.9
Cache2748%1.0514.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
68.7%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
538msReaction time
30.7%T opening success
51.2%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
9.28HE damage / grenade
8.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.6862% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–3-0.0214%21 Aug
nuke0–13-0.117%17 Aug
mirage22–200.0225%17 Aug
nuke19–16-0.0011%16 Aug
mirage13–70.1025%15 Aug
dust25–13-0.0410%12 Aug
nuke11–130.0114%11 Aug
ancient13–110.0026%6 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0126%6 Aug
cache6–130.0329%4 Aug
mirage13–110.0120%3 Aug
mirage11–130.0024%1 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0223%1 Aug
ancient13–50.0413%26 Jul
mirage13–100.0619%22 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0027%21 Jul
cache13–7-0.0413%21 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0335%19 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0715%5 Jul
mirage13–10.0713%3 Jul
mirage9–130.045%3 Jul
ancient16–140.0821%2 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0428%28 Jun
vertigo9–40.1925%27 Jun
ancient6–130.0516%27 Jun
overpass13–9-0.0618%24 Jun
mirage12–120.1229%24 Jun
dust213–5-0.0123%22 Jun
anubis9–13-0.019%20 Jun
mirage3–130.0450%15 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0331%13 Jun
ancient10–130.0425%12 Jun
nuke13–100.0031%12 Jun
nuke8–130.0625%8 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0218%1 Jun
inferno13–0-0.0414%1 Jun
anubis16–120.1035%31 May
nuke13–20.0628%30 May
nuke10–130.0022%27 May
inferno6–130.0241%27 May
inferno13–60.0321%23 May
nuke13–40.1250%23 May
mirage13–50.109%22 May
mirage13–30.0414%21 May
nuke13–30.1629%21 May
overpass13–110.0519%20 May
anubis13–50.0322%20 May
inferno13–70.0730%20 May
dust213–10-0.0314%17 May
nuke13–10-0.0023%11 May
anubis8–13-0.0510%11 May
inferno13–10-0.0127%11 May
inferno8–130.0430%8 May
mirage6–130.1133%8 May
cache9–130.0423%7 May
anubis2–30.0019%7 May
mirage8–13-0.1013%2 May
ancient4–13-0.0722%2 May
dust213–100.0615%30 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0718%28 Apr
overpass0–9-0.2410%28 Apr
nuke3–9-0.0224%28 Apr
mirage13–80.0726%28 Apr
mirage13–50.0811%26 Apr
nuke9–20.1533%26 Apr
inferno10–130.0419%25 Apr
inferno3–90.0026%25 Apr
mirage16–140.1021%25 Apr
inferno13–160.0127%22 Apr
nuke9–130.2429%21 Apr
mirage13–80.0532%18 Apr
nuke13–50.0119%16 Apr
nuke6–130.1027%15 Apr
nuke3–9-0.0319%15 Apr
ancient13–70.0414%14 Apr
mirage19–150.0722%10 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0518%10 Apr
ancient16–190.0417%9 Apr
nuke13–60.0424%6 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0211%6 Apr
overpass14–160.0125%3 Apr
inferno13–10.0519%2 Apr
anubis3–13-0.075%2 Apr
overpass9–13-0.0128%28 Mar
vertigo8–80.149%27 Mar
inferno9–60.1431%26 Mar
nuke3–9-0.1617%26 Mar
overpass10–13-0.0330%25 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0413%22 Mar
inferno12–120.1023%21 Mar
nuke5–130.1525%21 Mar
nuke13–7-0.0110%21 Mar
mirage13–60.0812%20 Mar
mirage5–60.0463%19 Mar
nuke11–130.1023%19 Mar
nuke13–60.1221%19 Mar
ancient4–13-0.028%15 Mar
mirage13–70.1220%14 Mar
anubis13–110.1012%13 Mar
inferno13–160.0026%13 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →