Debra

Debra — CS2 Stats

76561199519453157[U:1:1559187429]Steam profile ↗

406Tracked matches71%Win rate2023Tracked since
530Hours in CS47Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongEntry Fragger
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

1Days observed since 2026-08-29

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,711), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate58.4%42.7%44.0%above
Shot accuracy0.1%10.8%11.6%11.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.271.001.03above
Match win rate50.3%44.1%45.1%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDebraFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning72
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY543511Last 10054%Win rateWWWLLWLTTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry FraggerHigh opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim8.5
Aggression10.0
Utility5.5
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels6.7
Clutch10.0

Sharp aimerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning7.2
Utility5.5
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels6.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time580ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms
Headshot accuracy26.5%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 27.9% → last ⅓ avg 26.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.31Best rating — dust2 9–0
132Biggest win — anubis
8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
72In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA26161062%0.05
infernoA2011955%0.05
nukeC156940%0.00
anubisC114736%0.06
cacheA106460%0.06
ancientS96367%0.02
dust2B63350%0.06
train32167%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

9,569Lifetime kills
1.27K/D · Top 10% of Level 4 players
499Matches
50.3%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 4 players
58.4%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 4 players
0.1%Shot accuracy
1,320MVPs
193Hours (in match)
294Bombs planted
174Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,184nuke
773dust2
495inferno
54train
19vertigo
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1Matches
100%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
73.7ADR
88%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.7%Headshot accuracy
38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
588msReaction time
52.1%T opening success
61.8%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
9.20HE damage / grenade
12.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4682 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–70.1533%31 Aug
mirage13–30.1230%31 Aug
mirage13–100.0831%31 Aug
cache7–130.0224%30 Aug
cache8–130.0313%30 Aug
inferno13–70.0838%30 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0126%30 Aug
mirage12–120.1734%30 Aug
mirage12–120.0334%30 Aug
cache13–90.0718%30 Aug
inferno13–80.0722%30 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0226%30 Aug
inferno12–120.0525%30 Aug
mirage13–100.0415%30 Aug
train3–13-0.0913%30 Aug
inferno13–50.1439%30 Aug
train13–90.1426%29 Aug
cache12–120.0823%29 Aug
train13–110.1533%29 Aug
inferno12–120.0519%29 Aug
mirage13–110.0227%29 Aug
nuke7–130.0324%29 Aug
nuke7–6-0.0317%29 Aug
nuke13–60.0948%28 Aug
mirage13–110.0515%28 Aug
inferno13–80.0223%28 Aug
nuke12–120.0725%27 Aug
mirage13–80.0419%27 Aug
mirage7–130.0419%26 Aug
inferno13–30.0432%26 Aug
anubis7–130.0134%26 Aug
dust213–70.0636%26 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0632%26 Aug
mirage13–50.0230%26 Aug
nuke12–120.0221%25 Aug
dust25–9-0.0121%25 Aug
anubis13–60.1221%24 Aug
mirage13–90.1335%24 Aug
mirage6–130.0133%24 Aug
nuke0–4-0.150%24 Aug
nuke6–130.0729%24 Aug
inferno12–120.1127%24 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0223%24 Aug
ancient13–50.0625%24 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0223%23 Aug
mirage9–130.0525%23 Aug
ancient13–80.0334%23 Aug
inferno13–90.0749%23 Aug
anubis12–120.0428%23 Aug
inferno13–50.0934%22 Aug
anubis13–40.2854%22 Aug
inferno12–120.0619%22 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0125%22 Aug
anubis4–130.1427%22 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0431%22 Aug
inferno9–130.1425%22 Aug
ancient13–50.0525%22 Aug
anubis9–130.0417%21 Aug
mirage13–30.0338%21 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0021%21 Aug
cache3–13-0.0047%21 Aug
ancient13–50.1130%21 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0735%20 Aug
nuke6–6-0.0453%20 Aug
inferno13–30.1333%18 Aug
mirage6–130.0431%18 Aug
anubis13–2-0.0136%18 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0323%18 Aug
ancient13–80.0710%18 Aug
nuke13–70.0428%18 Aug
cache13–3-0.0721%18 Aug
mirage13–80.0548%17 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0430%17 Aug
cache13–80.0736%17 Aug
dust27–130.0646%16 Aug
inferno0–13-0.0331%16 Aug
cache13–50.1129%16 Aug
anubis6–130.0143%16 Aug
inferno13–20.0124%16 Aug
mirage13–30.1421%16 Aug
mirage13–70.1038%16 Aug
cache13–40.1119%16 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0147%14 Aug
nuke13–70.0728%13 Aug
mirage13–110.1032%13 Aug
nuke2–1-0.120%13 Aug
cache13–110.1923%12 Aug
dust29–00.3128%12 Aug
dust213–9-0.0126%12 Aug
inferno11–130.0231%12 Aug
nuke7–130.0737%12 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0128%11 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0225%11 Aug
anubis13–20.0232%10 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0917%9 Aug
mirage13–70.0429%9 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0415%9 Aug
dust21–13-0.0414%1 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0531%1 Aug
mirage13–30.1331%1 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →