k4bit bb — CS2 Stats

CA76561199511937659[U:1:1551671931]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,360Tracked matches40%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPassive Rifler

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,652 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66

Positioning42

Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–54Last 10046%Win rateLLWLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6

Aggression1.4

Utility3.4

Positioning4.2

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch3.2

Excellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 701ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6

Positioning4.2

Utility3.4

Mechanics8.6

Opening Duels0.0

Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time690ms+26ms

first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 690ms

Headshot accuracy25.1%+4.3%

first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 25.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — mirage 13–8

13–3Biggest win — dust2

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

10–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 57% over 14cacheWeakest map · 17% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	25	13–12	52%	-0.02
mirage	B	23	12–11	52%	-0.00
ancient	B	16	8–8	50%	-0.03
anubis	A	14	8–6	57%	-0.03
cache	D	12	2–10	17%	-0.01
nuke	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.00
inferno	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.04
vertigo	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,360Matches

50%Win rate

0.93Avg K/D

73.8ADR

54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	674	52%	0.96	14.7
Mirage	606	48%	0.88	13.8
Ancient	334	53%	0.97	15.0
Anubis	267	49%	0.96	14.8
Inferno	162	46%	0.92	14.9
Nuke	125	50%	0.90	15.0
Cache	59	39%	0.90	14.6
Overpass	50	46%	0.87	14.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.8%Headshot accuracy

28.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.1%Spray accuracy

88.8%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

701msReaction time

25.9%T opening success

28.8%CT opening success

0.54Enemies flashed / flash

8.5%Flash assists

3.89HE damage / grenade

2.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Settings
Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.
Reaction time 701.0402ms — above the 700ms mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 2.0482 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.9035% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	9–13	-0.01	19%	21 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	38%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	31%	21 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	21%	20 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.06	24%	18 Aug →
cache	12–16	-0.05	32%	18 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.10	12%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	28%	15 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	-0.06	32%	15 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.03	28%	15 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.03	39%	13 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	23%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.02	19%	13 Aug →
anubis	0–13	-0.10	15%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.11	27%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.05	23%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	27%	11 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.04	21%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.02	26%	11 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	32%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.03	31%	11 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.05	43%	11 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.10	33%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.00	30%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.04	17%	9 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	0.00	16%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.04	17%	6 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.01	24%	4 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	29%	4 Aug →
cache	14–16	0.01	21%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.06	10%	4 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.00	22%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	21%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.07	35%	2 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.07	23%	2 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.02	29%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.00	27%	1 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.04	26%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.04	23%	31 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	11%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.03	34%	30 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.05	19%	29 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.02	22%	29 Jul →
dust2	17–19	-0.02	25%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.06	19%	29 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.01	27%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	28%	29 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.02	28%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.02	26%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.03	43%	29 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	14%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.03	33%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.00	28%	28 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	35%	28 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.02	25%	28 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.03	33%	28 Jul →
dust2	16–19	-0.00	29%	28 Jul →
cache	2–13	0.03	31%	26 Jul →
inferno	12–16	-0.03	30%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.08	28%	26 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.07	26%	25 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	21%	24 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	18%	24 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.05	34%	21 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	33%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.03	21%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	47%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.06	16%	20 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	31%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.01	23%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.06	14%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	16%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.05	26%	18 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.06	15%	18 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	20%	16 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	24%	15 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.07	23%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.07	20%	15 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	24%	15 Jul →
anubis	13–7	-0.08	18%	15 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	15%	15 Jul →
dust2	28–24	-0.01	19%	15 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	24%	15 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	19%	14 Jul →
mirage	19–17	-0.05	20%	14 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.07	7%	14 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.05	29%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.05	16%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.06	31%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.07	21%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.07	14%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.01	22%	9 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.00	17%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.00	19%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.00	28%	9 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	27%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.10	22%	9 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.04	29%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.03	13%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.01	26%	8 Jul →