҈

҈ — CS2 Stats

76561199500950063[U:1:1540684335]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,447Tracked matches55%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,977Top 10% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12948 of 252139 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,447 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,977 +4,680 26 Aug – 12 Oct · 25 days played
21,23525,977peak 25,97726 Aug12 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,447 +0 1 Sept – 3 Oct · 6 observations
1,4471,447peak 1,4471 Sept3 Oct
26,025Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,447Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-08-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,447
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 84 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 25,977
  • +3,250 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,023 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG҈FACEITLevel 9 · 1,447 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,977 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,447csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning47
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–38–6Last 10056%Win rateLWLLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · +50ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility6.2
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch3.6

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.7
Utility6.2
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time561ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 566ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 15 Sept →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · nuke, 9 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · mirage, 9 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 16 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
10–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11ancientWeakest map · 50% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB5731–2654%0.01
ancientB147–750%-0.01
nukeS118–373%0.01
anubisA106–460%-0.01
dust2—42–250%0.00
inferno—32–167%-0.02
cache—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

890Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
75.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage37450%1.0515.3
Inferno13749%1.1015.8
Dust210942%0.9315.0
Ancient10150%1.0314.9
Anubis6048%0.9113.6
Cache4156%1.1015.8
Nuke3658%1.2513.9
Overpass1759%1.2217.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
89.6%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
571msReaction time
39.1%T opening success
32.1%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
11.93HE damage / grenade
12.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.0523% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–11-0.0120%15 Oct →
mirage13–100.0331%14 Oct →
mirage7–130.0413%13 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0418%13 Oct →
anubis13–70.0323%12 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0221%12 Oct →
dust213–100.0118%12 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0624%12 Oct →
mirage13–10.0718%11 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0118%11 Oct →
mirage13–60.0821%10 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.0315%10 Oct →
nuke13–110.0115%10 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0326%10 Oct →
mirage13–50.0731%9 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0425%9 Oct →
mirage13–110.0314%9 Oct →
mirage13–80.0120%8 Oct →
ancient13–60.0122%8 Oct →
dust213–60.0029%8 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0118%1 Oct →
ancient10–130.0322%30 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0619%30 Sept →
mirage5–130.0120%30 Sept →
mirage13–80.0022%29 Sept →
mirage12–120.0124%28 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0618%28 Sept →
mirage13–80.1123%26 Sept →
anubis13–10.0423%26 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0115%26 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.049%26 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.0315%24 Sept →
mirage13–90.0322%17 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0410%17 Sept →
nuke13–60.0126%17 Sept →
nuke13–40.0723%17 Sept →
mirage13–110.0220%16 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0131%16 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0030%16 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0020%16 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0533%16 Sept →
mirage13–00.0322%16 Sept →
mirage12–120.0135%16 Sept →
mirage13–100.0419%15 Sept →
mirage10–130.0421%15 Sept →
mirage13–40.1831%15 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0213%14 Sept →
nuke13–20.0021%14 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0030%14 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0226%14 Sept →
mirage13–110.0930%13 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0112%13 Sept →
ancient13–1-0.0125%13 Sept →
mirage5–130.0227%12 Sept →
anubis13–110.0018%12 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0017%12 Sept →
mirage7–130.0229%11 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0536%11 Sept →
anubis7–8-0.0610%11 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0318%11 Sept →
ancient13–60.0525%11 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0025%10 Sept →
mirage13–110.0214%10 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0618%10 Sept →
mirage13–50.0323%9 Sept →
nuke13–10.1241%9 Sept →
inferno13–110.0212%9 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0520%8 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0511%8 Sept →
dust210–130.0320%8 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0118%7 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0614%7 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0112%7 Sept →
mirage13–100.0823%7 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0517%7 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0214%6 Sept →
ancient13–30.1017%6 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0333%6 Sept →
mirage10–9-0.0315%6 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0424%3 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0914%3 Sept →
mirage13–110.0118%3 Sept →
mirage13–90.0325%1 Sept →
nuke13–50.0113%1 Sept →
anubis13–90.0213%1 Sept →
mirage13–40.0423%31 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0014%31 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0521%31 Aug →
mirage7–130.1726%30 Aug →
ancient7–130.0524%29 Aug →
mirage13–100.0315%29 Aug →
mirage13–60.0214%29 Aug →
mirage13–60.1013%28 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0312%27 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0223%27 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.059%27 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.037%26 Aug →
nuke4–130.0319%26 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.1119%25 Aug →
mirage13–110.0115%24 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.