MANUKAS

MANUKAS — CS2 Stats

FI76561199486209709[U:1:1525943981]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,438Tracked matches43%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,999Top 25% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21090 of 233317 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 24,999 → 24,999
+3Tracked matches · now 1,438
−3.6ppWin rate · 46.4% → 42.9%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 18 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,999 +327 19 Jul19 Sept · 19 days played
24,34725,897peak 25,89719 Jul19 Sept
26,004Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2026-07-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 898 below peak (25,897)
  • -898 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMANUKASFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER24,999 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim96
Positioning55
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41554Last 10041%Win rateWLLLWWLTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +11.4pp headshot accuracy · +43ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 46%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 34%
  • Avg reaction 437ms

Last 20

  • 992 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 415ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim9.6
Utility5.8
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 96 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.6
Positioning5.5
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact2.6

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time443ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 478ms → last ⅓ avg 443ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%+6.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 9–5 · inferno, 1 Aug
75%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · office, 20 Sept
164msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · inferno, 19 Aug
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 7 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
81In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 71% over 7ancientWeakest map · 20% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB29151452%0.06
officeB157847%0.05
ancientD1531220%0.04
mirageD103730%0.01
anubisD102820%0.02
cacheA74357%-0.01
dust2S75271%0.01
infernoD62433%0.02
train1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

9Matches
44%Win rate
0.43Avg K/D
ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno250%0.335.5
Mirage250%0.525.5
Nuke20%0.589.5
Vertigo10%0.203.0
Anubis1100%0.4513.0
Ancient1100%0.368.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.9%Spray accuracy
83.0%Counter-strafing
6.9°Preaim
452msReaction time
28.5%T opening success
45.1%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
8.61HE damage / grenade
16.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.5414% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office13–20.0875%20 Sept
train7–130.0038%20 Sept
office2–13-0.0529%17 Sept
office6–13-0.0150%11 Sept
nuke11–00.0738%11 Sept
office13–100.0131%10 Sept
office10–130.1419%7 Sept
ancient12–12-0.0111%7 Sept
nuke13–10.1929%7 Sept
office2–130.0415%6 Sept
office13–9-0.0329%6 Sept
office10–130.1819%6 Sept
office11–130.1615%5 Sept
office3–10.0329%5 Sept
mirage13–110.0323%5 Sept
office5–130.0217%4 Sept
office13–10-0.0424%3 Sept
office13–10.1227%3 Sept
nuke12–120.0922%30 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0515%30 Aug
nuke13–110.0919%29 Aug
ancient0–40.0660%24 Aug
cache13–100.0216%23 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0019%22 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0112%22 Aug
anubis2–130.0313%21 Aug
anubis6–13-0.054%21 Aug
nuke6–130.0218%20 Aug
inferno13–80.0220%20 Aug
ancient3–13-0.033%20 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0030%20 Aug
nuke5–90.1010%19 Aug
inferno1–9-0.1919%19 Aug
office13–70.0325%19 Aug
nuke13–10.0315%19 Aug
nuke13–40.0427%18 Aug
dust25–13-0.0419%18 Aug
nuke9–130.0814%18 Aug
anubis4–130.0419%16 Aug
dust213–90.0814%16 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0612%15 Aug
office6–130.1318%15 Aug
nuke13–70.0829%6 Aug
anubis7–130.0214%4 Aug
nuke16–140.0513%4 Aug
ancient15–150.0914%4 Aug
dust213–5-0.0418%4 Aug
mirage1–13-0.097%4 Aug
cache13–9-0.046%4 Aug
anubis13–20.1114%4 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0013%4 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0613%4 Aug
nuke7–130.1116%3 Aug
ancient4–130.0123%3 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0520%3 Aug
anubis5–130.0612%3 Aug
nuke13–40.1315%3 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0413%3 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0511%3 Aug
dust213–4-0.0113%2 Aug
dust213–110.0216%2 Aug
mirage13–80.129%2 Aug
inferno9–50.2329%1 Aug
inferno1–130.0126%1 Aug
cache0–13-0.0220%1 Aug
nuke13–100.1711%1 Aug
mirage6–50.1024%1 Aug
cache4–130.0113%1 Aug
nuke13–100.0718%1 Aug
cache13–70.0613%31 Jul
cache13–6-0.0110%31 Jul
dust210–130.0220%31 Jul
nuke9–130.0318%31 Jul
nuke10–130.0615%31 Jul
ancient13–60.1326%31 Jul
nuke9–10.1323%31 Jul
nuke9–70.0710%31 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0418%31 Jul
nuke7–130.0124%31 Jul
nuke10–130.0122%31 Jul
ancient10–130.1514%31 Jul
mirage5–130.0828%30 Jul
nuke13–90.1024%30 Jul
ancient8–130.0828%30 Jul
anubis13–110.0227%30 Jul
nuke8–130.0226%30 Jul
mirage4–130.0221%30 Jul
inferno5–130.0224%30 Jul
ancient13–100.0710%30 Jul
anubis8–11-0.0327%30 Jul
nuke13–90.0821%30 Jul
mirage10–13-0.098%28 Jul
cache3–13-0.1018%28 Jul
ancient6–130.028%28 Jul
inferno15–150.0713%20 Jul
ancient13–30.1038%20 Jul
dust213–60.0420%19 Jul
ancient8–13-0.025%19 Jul
nuke0–9-0.060%18 Jul
nuke9–40.085%18 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →