AppleSauce

AppleSauce — CS2 Stats

US76561199466943250[U:1:1506677522]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

296Tracked matches72%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.6 StrongAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating16,461Purple band · top ~22.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+708Premier CS Rating · 15,753 → 16,461

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,461 +4,751 28 Aug – 16 Oct · 21 days played
11,12816,461peak 16,46128 Aug16 Oct
16,461Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-07-22

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 16,461
  • +4,474 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,539 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAppleSauceFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER16,461 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning68
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55–44–1Last 10055%Win rateWWWLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · +104ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 20

  • 13–6–1 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.4
Utility6.1
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels5.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.8
Utility6.1
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels5.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time556ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 18 Sept →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · inferno, 4 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · nuke, 22 Jul →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 18 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
6–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 79% over 24ancientWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS2419–579%0.05
mirageA1811–761%0.05
nukeC167–944%0.03
dust2C167–944%0.03
ancientD165–1131%0.03
infernoC73–443%0.03
anubis—33–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
86.4%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
554msReaction time
51.5%T opening success
53.7%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
8.03HE damage / grenade
10.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–100.0220%16 Oct →
cache13–100.0325%16 Oct →
cache13–100.0414%15 Oct →
mirage4–130.0223%15 Oct →
mirage13–70.0429%12 Oct →
nuke13–90.0122%12 Oct →
inferno13–40.0014%8 Oct →
dust211–13-0.049%8 Oct →
cache13–40.0536%8 Oct →
anubis13–30.0024%8 Oct →
cache13–100.0426%6 Oct →
cache15–150.0521%6 Oct →
dust214–160.0024%4 Oct →
cache13–110.0819%3 Oct →
inferno10–130.0428%3 Oct →
mirage13–90.0023%3 Oct →
mirage13–70.0715%1 Oct →
mirage8–130.0720%1 Oct →
ancient3–130.0020%1 Oct →
anubis13–70.069%1 Oct →
nuke7–130.0314%1 Oct →
ancient13–70.0427%1 Oct →
cache13–90.0517%1 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0214%30 Sept →
cache16–140.1315%30 Sept →
cache13–80.0222%30 Sept →
nuke13–110.028%29 Sept →
cache13–80.0216%28 Sept →
cache13–70.1816%28 Sept →
nuke13–60.0823%28 Sept →
anubis13–60.0719%25 Sept →
dust26–130.0214%25 Sept →
inferno13–100.0722%25 Sept →
inferno11–130.0616%24 Sept →
cache16–130.0116%24 Sept →
cache16–120.0613%24 Sept →
cache13–70.1215%24 Sept →
dust213–80.0417%24 Sept →
cache13–70.0318%24 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0619%23 Sept →
nuke6–130.0517%23 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0214%20 Sept →
mirage11–130.0219%20 Sept →
mirage13–90.0113%20 Sept →
mirage13–50.1318%20 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0015%20 Sept →
cache13–60.0926%20 Sept →
mirage6–130.0211%20 Sept →
mirage13–90.0822%19 Sept →
ancient13–20.2311%18 Sept →
cache13–80.1423%18 Sept →
mirage7–130.0421%18 Sept →
dust29–130.0119%18 Sept →
mirage13–80.0321%16 Sept →
nuke13–90.0728%16 Sept →
cache13–20.0318%16 Sept →
mirage6–70.0120%16 Sept →
cache13–90.0330%10 Sept →
ancient8–130.0811%10 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0220%10 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0518%10 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0211%4 Sept →
nuke13–110.0918%4 Sept →
dust213–70.0520%4 Sept →
ancient7–130.0125%4 Sept →
inferno6–130.0438%4 Sept →
ancient16–130.1123%4 Sept →
dust213–100.0923%4 Sept →
nuke16–120.0411%28 Aug →
nuke7–130.0316%28 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0123%28 Aug →
mirage7–130.0322%27 Aug →
dust213–80.079%27 Aug →
nuke13–70.0517%27 Aug →
mirage13–60.0614%27 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0414%25 Aug →
ancient11–130.0513%25 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.1114%13 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.017%12 Aug →
nuke8–130.0918%10 Aug →
dust213–60.0620%10 Aug →
mirage13–80.0732%5 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0014%4 Aug →
mirage13–90.0722%4 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0113%4 Aug →
ancient11–130.0523%3 Aug →
nuke6–130.0120%3 Aug →
cache2–13-0.045%3 Aug →
dust28–130.0322%3 Aug →
mirage13–20.1018%3 Aug →
inferno13–110.0425%3 Aug →
dust216–130.0915%3 Aug →
ancient13–30.088%2 Aug →
dust28–130.0521%31 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0115%30 Jul →
ancient13–110.0513%30 Jul →
nuke2–8-0.0620%30 Jul →
dust213–40.1316%30 Jul →
nuke1–90.0514%22 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0919%22 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.